Template:Did you know nominations/Vinkovci Treasure

{{#if:yes|Category:Passed DYK nominations from July 2012

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 10:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
}}

==Vinkovci Treasure==

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Vinkovci Treasure|Vinkovci Treasure}}

File:Vinkovci treasure 2.jpg

... that the Vinkovci Treasure (pictured), consisting of 48 items of 4th century Roman silverware found in March 2012, has been called one of Croatia's most important archaeological finds?

:*Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Peziza phyllogena

Created/expanded by Fæ (talk), Prioryman (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 09:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

16px New enough and long enough. QPQ done. Both images have acceptable copyrights. Article is fully supported by inline sources. Hook is supported by inline citations which support text. [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FVinkovci_Treasure&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.world-archaeology.com%2Fnews%2Froman-vessels-vinkovci-croatia%2F&minwords=2&minchars=13 no concerns] with that.
16px "If so, it would be a very rare subject for a late Roman silver plate" Says who? This doesn't seem very neutral. Maybe explain who says that to make it seem less like a GOTCHA! ISN'T THIS COOL?
I have moved this to the talk page. It is sourced to the BM blog post but, as said on the talk page, seems overly speculative. See Talk:Vinkovci_Treasure#Good_Shepherd. --Fæ (talk) 10:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
16px [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FVinkovci_Treasure&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.britishmuseum.org%2F2012%2F04%2F11%2Fnew-treasure%2F&minwords=2&minchars=13 this] is probably not a huge problem but "then subsequently transferred under armed guard to the mimara museum in zagreb where they" and "then transported under armed guard to the mimara museum in zagreb where it". Can some of this text be reworked?
16px Croatian sources not plagiarised and support the text. --LauraHale (talk) 10:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

16px Make that one statement more forceful and rework that problem sentence. --LauraHale (talk) 10:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

:I think this is now resolved - the statement has been moved out of the article, and the problem sentence has been reworded. Prioryman (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

16px Review of edits and things appear to be resolved enough. Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 21:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

{{-}}{{#if:yes|

|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|Category:Pending DYK nominations|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|Category:Pending DYK nominations}}}}}}