Template talk:Alt-right footer#Truth Social

{{Permanently protected}}

{{Talk header|search=yes}}

{{Contentious topics/talk notice|blp|ap|1RR=yes}}

{{Controversial}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=other|collapsed=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Conservatism}}

{{WikiProject Culture}}

{{WP Discrimination}}

{{WP LGBTQIA}}

{{WikiProject Politics|American=yes}}

{{WikiProject Sociology}}

{{WikiProject United States|USPresidents=yes|DC=yes}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 1

|minthreadsleft = 3

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Template talk:Alt-right footer/Archive %(counter)d

}}

Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2024

{{edit semi-protected|Template:Alt-right footer|answered=yes}}

Unless this violates WP:NPOV, add Pseudoscience to the very first section (Ideas > Core). 67.209.129.153 (talk) 13:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

:{{not done for now}}: I'm not sure where it sits in regards to WP:NPOV, but regardless I would prefer there to be consensus before it is added. Ultraodan (talk) 14:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2025

{{edit semi-protected|Template:Alt-right footer|answered=yes}}

Add 'Angry Goy II' to some other section, it's currently in the 'Opposition and criticism' section, when it's very much not opposed... 78.144.160.58 (talk) 16:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

:File:X mark.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Tlx|Edit semi-protected}} template. Also, what section would you propose for it to be moved to? veko. (user | talk | contribs) 16:18, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

this template is a pile of garbage

I mean this entirely constructively. It sucks. Overloaded, essentially zero inclusion criteria, it's a virtual waste bin to shoehorn any and every article with any purported ties to the nebulous "alt-right". I'm not conservative or sympathetic to the alt-right, but dumpsters like this give valid ammunition to conservative critics of Wikipedia. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Animalparty I agree. At least something like Template:neo-Nazism, if deeply flawed, is almost all defining and all Nazi stuff. This is just an arbitrary assortment of actual Neo-Nazis and miscellaneous far-right people several of whom aren't even notable for that. The problem is really just the word "alt-right", which is at best loosely understood.... not very good for templates. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

::I first aired my concerns back in 2017, when "Alt-right" was still new and exciting (and this template was then, as now, a dumpster). Nothing has improved since. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:::@Animalparty Do you have any suggestions? PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

:I'm going through it for verifiability and removing any article that does not, at some point, say the words "alt-right" in reference to the article subject. We should have a higher bar, but this is an OK start. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:56, 25 May 2025 (UTC)