Template talk:Infobox train#Request for an extra parameter

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}

|maxarchivesize = 75K

|counter = 1

|minthreadsleft = 3

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(14d)

|archive = Template talk:Infobox train/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Infoboxes}}

{{WikiProject Trains}}

}}

{{archives}}

Owner

I think it should say who owns each train i.e. Porterbrook owns the Class 458, 460, 158 and 159 units, just to pick 4 examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdiddyjr (talkcontribs) 15:58, 10 April 2012‎

What exactly does "successor" mean?

What exactly does "successor" mean? Does it mean the next train to be produced after that train? Or does it mean the train that replaces that train when it is withdrawn from service? Steelkamp (talk) 05:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Wrong Multiple Working

The Multiple Working linked is likely too specific as it is the British Multiple Working. This should probably be changed to Multiple-unit train control to be more generic and applicable properly to trains outside Great Britain. Object-Concept (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)