Thames Barrier

Flooding in London has been a problem since Roman times.{{cite journal |last=Kendrick |first=Mary |author-link=Mary Kendrick |date=1988 |title=The Thames Barrier |journal=Landscape and Urban Planning |volume=16 |issue=1–2 |pages=57–68 |doi=10.1016/0169-2046(88)90034-5|bibcode=1988LUrbP..16...57K }} In 1954, the Waverley Committee, established to investigate the serious North Sea flood of 1953 which affected parts of the Thames Estuary and parts of London, recommended that "as an alternative to raising the banks, the possibility and cost of erecting a structure across the Thames which could be closed in a surge should be urgently investigated".

{{cite hansard |title=Coastal Flooding (Committee's Report) |url=https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1954/jun/03/coastal-flooding-committees-report |house=House of Commons |date=3 June 1954 |volume=528 |column_start=104 |column_end=5W |speaker=D. Maxwell Fyfe |position=Home Secretary |hansard=Written Answers (Hansard)}} A number of designs were put forward, from a huge road viaduct with two 500 foot (150 m) sluice gates crossing the Thames at Crayfordness to flap gates lying on the river bed and floated up by compressed air.{{cite book |last1=Gilbert |first1=Stuart |last2=Horner |first2=Ray |title=The Thames Barrier |year=1984 |publisher=T. Telford |location=London |isbn=978-0-7277-0182-4 |oclc=11594001}}{{page needed|date=March 2021}} By 1965, when the Greater London Council (GLC) took over responsibility, two major schemes were under consideration, costed at £24 million and £41 million respectively (£500 million and £800 million at 2020 prices).{{page needed|date=March 2021}}

In 1966, Sir Hermann Bondi was asked to take an independent view of the situation. He considered the estimated construction costs and the probability of a flood and of damage if the barrier was not built. He strongly recommended that a barrier should be built in order to avoid the catastrophe of flooding central London, and a site was agreed at Woolwich.{{page needed|date=March 2021}}

The barrier protects central London against a storm surge, caused when a deep depression forms to the north of Scotland and progresses across the North Sea and south-easterly towards southern Scandinavia. When such a surge coincides with a high spring tide, the high winds associated with the depression can funnel the water up the Thames Estuary and cause surges of up to 3.5 metres (11.6 feet). The planners assessed that in the absence of a barrier, such a surge could inundate 45 square miles (117 km²) of land, put hospitals, power stations and the London Underground out of action and cause damage estimated in 1966 at £2 billionThe Thames Barrier: The Background and Basic Engineering Requirements. D Ayres Director of Public Health Engineering, GLC. 1983. Paper presented to a meeting of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 8th June 1983 (about £50 billion at 2020 prices). The barrier was designed to provide a flood defence capable of resisting a once in 1000 year surge tide at a base date of 2030.

File:Thames Barrier - simple operation diagram.png

The concept of the rising sector gates was devised by (Reginald) Charles Drapeer. In 1969, from his parents' house in Pellatt Grove, Wood Green, London, he constructed a working model. The novel rotating cylinders were based on the design of the taps on his gas cooker. The barrier was designed by Rendel, Palmer and Tritton for the Greater London Council and the concept tested at the Hydraulics Research Station, Wallingford. The site at New Charlton was chosen because of the relative straightness of the banks, and because the underlying river chalk was strong enough to support the barrier.

The Thames Barrier and Flood Prevention Act, authorising construction, was passed in 1972. In 1974, the GLC placed the two major construction contracts. Civil construction was undertaken by a Costain/Hollandsche Beton Maatschappij/Tarmac Construction consortium.{{page needed|date=March 2021}} A separate contract for the gates and operating machinery was placed with the Davy Cleveland Barrier Consortium, formed by Davy McKee Ltd of Sheffield and Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd.{{cite web |url=https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Davy_Cleveland_Barrier_Consortium |title=Davy Cleveland Barrier Consortium |author= |date=30 July 2019 |website=Grace's Guide |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124201649/https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Davy_Cleveland_Barrier_Consortium |archive-date=2020-11-24}}{{page needed|date=March 2021}}

Work began at the barrier site in 1974 and progressed in two phases. The southern piers (9 to 6) were built first, with river traffic diverted to the north side, then traffic routed through the completed southern spans whilst the north side piers (1 to 5) were built. During construction of the piers, precast concrete sills were built in a cofferdam on the north side of the river and floated out and sunk between the piers to form the gate recesses, with access tunnels at the upstream and downstream ends.{{cite web |url=http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/floods/38355.aspx |title=Engineers and main contractors for the building of the Thames Barrier |author= |publisher=Environment Agency |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090205134525/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/floods/38355.aspx |archive-date=5 February 2009 |access-date=13 March 2021 }}

The gates of the barrier were fabricated in sections at Cleveland Bridge's Darlington works and assembled at Port Clarence on the River Tees.{{cite journal |last=Horner |first=R. W. |date=July 1979 |title=The Thames Barrier Project |journal=The Geographical Journal |volume=145 |issue=2 |pages=242–253 |doi=10.2307/634390 |jstor=634390|bibcode=1979GeogJ.145..242H }}{{rp|251}} The gates, gate arms and rocking beams were transported from the Tees to the Thames by barge and lifted into position by two very large floating cranes operated by Neptun of Hamburg (now part of Smit International).Manufacture and Installation of the Barrier Gates and Operating Machinery – P F Harvey, Davy Cleveland Barrier Consortium – Institution of Mechanical Engineers – Paper presented at a meeting on 8th June 1983. The mechanical and hydraulic machinery was built by Davy Loewy, Henry Berry and Vickers and trial assembled in Davy's Darnall works. Delays to the civil works required changes to the construction and installation sequence, but commissioning was relatively uneventful and the first trial operation of all the gates together was carried out on 31 October 1982.{{cite news |last=Clayton |first=Hugh |date=4 November 1982 |title=All 10 gates being raised at the Thames barrier |url=https://www.thetimes.com/tto/archive/frame/article/1982-11-04/3/1.html |work=The Times |page=3 |access-date=2021-03-12}}

In addition to the barrier, the flood defences {{convert|11|mi|order=flip}} down river were raised and strengthened. The barrier was officially opened on 8 May 1984 by Queen Elizabeth II.{{cite news |title=Better way to turn the tide |newspaper=The Guardian |date=9 May 1984 |page=2 |url=https://www.newspapers.com/image/259609689/}} {{subscription required|via=Newspapers.com}} The barrier cost £{{Format price|461000000}} (£{{Format price|{{Inflation|UK-GDP|461000000|1984}}}} now).{{Inflation/fn|UK-GDP}} Total construction cost was around £535 million (£2.4 billion at 2024 prices){{Cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-thames-barrier-protecting-london-and-the-thames-estuary-for-40-years |title=The Thames Barrier – protecting London and the Thames Estuary for 40 years |author1= |date=2024-05-08 |department=Environment Agency |website=GOV.UK |type=Press release |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240508014811/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-thames-barrier-protecting-london-and-the-thames-estuary-for-40-years |archive-date=2024-05-08}} with an additional £100 million for river defences.{{citation needed|date=December 2024|reason=Additional river defences not mentioned in Environment Agency press release}}

Built across a {{convert|520|m|ft|adj=on}} wide stretch of the river, the barrier divides the river into four {{convert|61|m|ft|adj=on}} and two approximately 30-metre (100 ft) navigable spans. There are also four smaller non-navigable channels between nine concrete piers and two abutments. The flood gates across the openings are circular segments in cross section, and they operate by rotating, raised to allow "underspill" to allow operators to control upstream levels and a complete 180 degree rotation for maintenance. All the gates are hollow and made of steel up to {{convert|40|mm|in}} thick. The gates are filled with water when submerged and empty as they emerge from the river. The four large central gates are {{convert|20.1|m|ft}} high and weigh 3,700 tonnes each.{{cite web |url=http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/Thames_Barrier_2010_project_pack.pdf |title=The Thames Barrier Project Pack 2010 |publisher=Environment Agency |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101216014218/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/Thames_Barrier_2010_project_pack.pdf |archive-date=16 December 2010 |access-date=18 October 2011 }} Four radial gates by the river banks, also about 30 metres (100 ft) wide, can be lowered. These gate openings, unlike the main six, are non-navigable.{{citation needed|date=November 2021}}

A Thames Barrier flood defence closure is triggered when a combination of high tides forecast in the North Sea and high river flows at the tidal limit at Teddington Lock indicate that water levels would exceed {{convert|16|ft|m}} in central London. Though Teddington marks the Normal Tidal Limit, in periods of very high fluvial flow the tidal influence can be seen as far upstream as East Molesey on the Thames.{{cite news |last=de Castella |first=Tom |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26133660 |title=How does the Thames Barrier stop London flooding? |work=BBC News |date=11 February 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200608223429/https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26133660 |archive-date=2020-06-08}}

{{wide image|Thames Barrier, London, England - Feb 2010.jpg|900px|The barrier from Silvertown on the north bank of the river during normal operation, looking across to New Charlton}}

{{clear}}

{{As of|2024|May}}, there have been 221 flood defence closures. The barrier was closed twice on 9 November 2007 after a storm surge in the North Sea which was compared to the one in 1953.{{cite news |author= |date=9 November 2007 |title=North Sea flood tide fears recede |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/7086175.stm |work=BBC News |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200630014628/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/7086175.stm |archive-date=2020-06-30}} The main danger of flooding from the surge was on the coast above the Thames Barrier, where evacuations took place, but the winds abated a little and, at the Thames Barrier, the 9 November 2007 storm surge did not completely coincide with high tide.{{cite web |url=http://www.pol.ac.uk/home/news/2007-11stormsurge.html |title=Surge of 9 November 2007-11-09 |author= |date=9 November 2007 |department=Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory |publisher=Natural Environment Research Council |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120221223805/http://www.pol.ac.uk/home/news/2007-11stormsurge.html |archive-date=2012-02-21}}

On 20 August 1989, hours after the Marchioness disaster, the barrier was closed against a spring tide for 16 hours "to assist the diving and salvage operations".{{cite report |url=https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-aggregates-dredger-bowbelle-and-passenger-vessel-marchioness-on-the-river-thames-england-resulting-in-marchioness-sinking-with-loss-of-51-lives |title=Report of the Chief Inspector of Marine Accidents into the collision between the passenger launch Marchioness and MV Bowbelle with loss of life on the River Thames on 20 August 1989 |date=5 June 1990 |publisher=Department of Transport, Marine Accident Investigation Branch |section=Part III |format=PDF |access-date=12 March 2021}}

The barrier has survived 15 boat collisions without serious damage.{{cite news |last=Hanlon |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Hanlon |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/weather/10646439/The-Thames-Barrier-has-saved-London-but-is-it-time-for-TB2.html |url-access=subscription |title=The Thames Barrier has saved London – but is it time for TB2? |newspaper=The Telegraph |location=London |date=18 February 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161112091127/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/weather/10646439/The-Thames-Barrier-has-saved-London-but-is-it-time-for-TB2.html |archive-date=2016-11-12}}

On 27 October 1997, the barrier was damaged when the dredger MV Sand Kite hit one of the piers in thick fog. As the ship started to sink she dumped her 3,300-tonne load of aggregate, finally sinking by the bow on top of one of the barrier's gates, where she lay for several days. Initially the gate could not be closed as it was covered in a thick layer of gravel. A longer-term problem was the premature loss of paint on the flat side of the gate caused by abrasion. The vessel was refloated in mid-November 1997.{{cite report |url=https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/contact-made-by-dredger-sand-carrier-sand-kite-with-the-thames-flood-barrier-river-thames-england-resulting-in-flooding-and-partial-sinking-of-vessel |title=Report of the Inspector's Inquiry into the collision of MV Sand Kite with the Thames Flood Barrier on 27 October 1997 |date=April 1999 |publisher=Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Marine Accident Investigation Branch |format=PDF |access-date=12 March 2021}}

The annual full test closure in 2012 was scheduled for 3 June to coincide with the Thames pageant celebrating the Diamond Jubilee of Elizabeth II. Environment Agency said the pageant provided "a unique opportunity to test its design for a longer period than we would normally be able to", and performance under conditions of "a higher water level upstream than downstream"; also that the "more stable tidal conditions … in central London … will help the vessels taking part".{{cite news |title=Thames Barrier test closure to be on Jubilee pageant day |date=6 March 2012 |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-17266139 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210313032146/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-17266139 |archive-date=2021-03-13}}

The barrier was originally commissioned by the Greater London Council under the guidance of Ray Horner. After the 1986 abolition of the GLC it was operated successively by Thames Water Authority (dissolved 1989) and then the National Rivers Authority until April 1996 when it passed to the Environment Agency.

The barrier was originally designed to protect London against a very high flood level (with an estimated return period of one hundred years) up to the year 2030, after which the protection would decrease, while remaining within acceptable limits.{{cite web |url=http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/floods/105205.aspx |title=Managing flood water: The future |author= |publisher=Environment Agency |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090606062958/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/floods/105205.aspx |archive-date=6 June 2009 |access-date=25 November 2009 }} At the time of its construction, the barrier was expected to be used 2–3 times per year. By the mid-2000s it was being operated 6–7 times a year.{{cite report |author=World Heritage Centre |date=May 2007 |title=Climate Change and World Heritage |chapter-url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/series/22/ |publisher=UNESCO |chapter-format=PDF |location=Paris |chapter=Predicting and Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage |page=29 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200715032811/https://whc.unesco.org/en/series/22/ |archive-date=2020-07-15}} In the 2010s, the barrier was generally (as a median) closed twice a year but the average is still 6–7 due to the extreme of 50 times in 2013–14.

This defence level allowed for long-term changes in sea and land levels as understood at that time (c. 1970). From 1982 until 19 March 2007, the barrier was raised one hundred times to prevent flooding. It is also raised monthly for testing,{{cite web |url=http://www.thamesweb.com/news_story.php?news_id=144 |title=Thames Barrier Clocks 100 Closures |author= |date=19 March 2007 |website=ThamesWEB |publisher=Thames Estuary Partnership |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081223120826/http://www.thamesweb.com/news_story.php?news_id=144 |archive-date=2008-12-23}} with a full test closure over high tide once a year.

Released in 2005, a study by four academics contained a proposal to supersede the Thames Barrier with a more ambitious 16 km (10 mi) long barrier across the Thames Estuary from Sheerness in Kent to Southend-on-Sea in Essex.{{cite news |last=Leake |first=Jonathan |date=9 January 2005 |title=Ten mile barrier to stop London flood |url=https://www.thetimes.com/uk/science/article/ten-mile-barrier-to-stop-london-flood-svs2r99x8xq |url-access=subscription |work=The Sunday Times |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210312210221/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ten-mile-barrier-to-stop-london-flood-svs2r99x8xq |archive-date=2021-03-12}}

In November 2011, a new Thames Barrier, further downstream at Lower Hope between East Tilbury in Essex and Cliffe in Kent, was proposed as part of the Thames Hub integrated infrastructure vision. The barrier would incorporate turbines to generate renewable energy and include road and rail tunnels, providing connections from Essex to a major new Thames Estuary Airport on the Isle of Grain.{{cite web |title=Thames Hub: An Integrated Vision for Britain |publisher=Foster+Partners, Halcrow, Volterra |url= http://www.halcrow.com/Thames-Hub/PDF/Thames_Hub_vision.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111110074451/http://www.halcrow.com/Thames-Hub/PDF/Thames_Hub_vision.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=10 November 2011}}

In 2019 architects Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands and marine engineers Beckett Rankine launched a proposal for a pedestrian and cycle bridge located next to the Thames Barrier; the scheme, called the Thames Barrier Bridge, was promoted as the only location in east London where a low-level opening bridge across the Thames could have relatively moderate opening spans of about {{cvt|60|m}}.{{cite magazine |last=Horgan |first=Rob |date=3 June 2019 |title=Thames Barrier Bridge proposal revealed |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/thames-barrier-bridge-proposal-revealed-03-06-2019/ |url-access=limited |magazine=New Civil Engineer |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129121044/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/thames-barrier-bridge-proposal-revealed-03-06-2019/ |archive-date=2021-01-29}}{{cite news |last=Waite |first=Richard |date=3 June 2019 |title=Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands reveals Thames Barrier bridge plans |url=https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/lifschutz-davidson-sandilands-reveals-thames-barrier-bridge-plans |work=Architects' Journal |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210313000533/https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/lifschutz-davidson-sandilands-reveals-thames-barrier-bridge-plans |archive-date=2021-03-13}}{{cite web |title=Thames Barrier Bridge |publisher=Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands, Beckett Rankine |url= https://www.thamesbarrierbridge.com/ |access-date=11 June 2019}}

In a January 2013 letter to The Times, a former member of the Thames Barrier Project Management Team, Dr Richard Bloore, stated that it was not designed with increased storminess and sea level rises in mind, and called for a new barrier to be looked into immediately.{{cite news |title=Letters to the Editor: Thames Barrier |url=https://www.thetimes.com/travel/destinations/north-america-travel/us-travel/new-york-city/thames-barrier-q3t8rr9r8hz |newspaper=The Times |date=3 January 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201128000605/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/thames-barrier-q3t8rr9r8hz |archive-date=2020-11-28}}{{cite news |title=Thames Barrier engineer says second defence needed |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-20904885 |work=BBC News |date=5 January 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210312154550/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-20904885 |archive-date=2021-03-12}}

The Environment Agency responded that it did not plan to replace the Thames Barrier before 2070,{{cite news |last=Cole |first=Margo |title=Environment Agency rejects calls for new Thames Barrier |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/archive/environment-agency-rejects-calls-for-new-thames-barrier-10-01-2013/ |url-access=limited |newspaper=New Civil Engineer |date=10 January 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210313022150/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/archive/environment-agency-rejects-calls-for-new-thames-barrier-10-01-2013/?tkn=1 |archive-date=2021-03-13}} as it was designed with an allowance for sea level rise of {{cvt|8|mm}} per year, which has not happened in the intervening years.{{cite web |title=Thames Barrier Project Pack 2012 |url=http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/Thames_Barrier_Project_pack_2012.pdf |publisher=Environment Agency |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121206074724/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/Thames_Barrier_Project_pack_2012.pdf |archive-date=6 December 2012 |access-date=28 December 2012 }} At the time, the barrier was around halfway through its designed lifespan. The standard of protection it provides will gradually decline over time after 2030, from a 1-in-1000-year event. The Environment Agency was examining the Thames Barrier for its potential design life under climate change, with early indications being that subject to appropriate modification, the Thames Barrier would be capable of providing continued protection to London against rising sea levels.

A UK Environment Agency review in 2023 said that new climate models showed heightened risk of flooding, implying a need for raised defences upstream of the Thames Barrier by 2050, but that the Thames Barrier was expected to continue to operate until 2070.{{Cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/thames-estuary-2100-time-to-plan-and-time-to-act|title=Thames Estuary 2100: Time to Plan and Time to Act|website=GOV.UK}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.ft.com/content/027a0d94-90f6-4841-94c1-b974ac895adb|title=Holding back the floods for 40 years: Thames Barrier is due an upgrade|website=www.ft.com}}

A decision on the best option for adapting to sea level rise to 2100 will be taken by 2040.{{Cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/guidance/managing-future-flood-risk-and-thames-barrier-thames-estuary-2100|title=Managing future flood risk and Thames Barrier: Thames Estuary 2100|website=GOV.UK}}

As of 2024 concerns exist that climate change is occurring faster than previously expected.{{Cite web|url=https://www.euronews.com/green/2024/01/15/i-am-more-worried-than-ever-scientists-explain-why-record-shattering-2023-heat-has-them-on|title=Is global warming accelerating faster than predicted?|date=15 January 2024|website=euronews}}{{Cite web|url=https://climate.copernicus.eu/global-climate-highlights-2023|title=Global Climate Highlights 2023 | Copernicus|website=climate.copernicus.eu}}

{{Portal|London}}

• Barrier Gardens Pier
• Crossings of the River Thames
• Delta Works with the Oosterscheldekering
• Floodgate
• MOSE Project
• Saint Petersburg Dam Flood Prevention Facility Complex
• Thames Barrier Park

{{Reflist}}

• R. W. Horner (November 1987). "The Thames Barrier". IEE Proceedings A 134 (9): 752–760. {{doi|10.1049/ip-a-1.1987.0103}}.
• Ken Wilson (1984). The Story of the Thames Barrier. London: Lanthorn. 32 pages. {{ISBN|978-0-947987-05-3}}. {{OCLC|60084379}}.

{{Commons category}}

• [https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-thames-barrier Official website]
• [http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=541250&y=179750&z=0&sv=541250,179750&st=4&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf Streetmap of Thames Barrier] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141012052629/http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=541250&y=179750&z=0&sv=541250,179750&st=4&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf |date=12 October 2014 }}
• [https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/parks-green-spaces-and-biodiversity/parks-and-green-spaces/thames-barrier-park Thames Barrier Park page] from the Greater London Authority
• {{webarchive |url=https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140328224801/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/floods/105437.aspx |date=2014-03-28 |title=Other tidal defences in London}}, from the Environment Agency
• [http://risques.tv/video.php?id_DTvideo=269 Risques VS Fictions n°8], filmed interview (subtitled in French) with Steve East, technical support team leader of the real barrier about the depiction of the barrier and scientific accuracy of Flood.
• [https://www.pbs.org/video/sinking-cities-london-jzqg22/ Sinking Cities: London] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210620145611/https://www.pbs.org/video/sinking-cities-london-jzqg22/ |date=20 June 2021 }} 55min. PBS

{{ThamesCrossings | west= Silvertown Tunnel | east=Woolwich Ferry }}

{{London landmarks}}

{{LB Newham}}

Category:Dams completed in 1984

Category:Buildings and structures in the Royal Borough of Greenwich

Category:Buildings and structures in the London Borough of Newham

Category:Charlton, London

Category:Coastal construction

Category:Flood barriers

Category:Flood control in the United Kingdom

Barrier

Category:Infrastructure in London

Category:Port of London

Category:Tourist attractions in the Royal Borough of Greenwich

Category:Tourist attractions in the London Borough of Newham

Category:1984 establishments in England