The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu

{{Infobox book

| italic title =

| name = The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu

| image = M. Joly. Dialogue aux enfers. Title page, 1864.jpeg

| image_size =

| border =

| alt =

| caption = Dialogue aux enfers, 1864

| author = Maurice Joly

| audio_read_by =

| title_orig = Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu

| orig_lang_code = fr

| title_working =

| translator =

| illustrator =

| cover_artist =

| country =

| language =

| series =

| release_number =

| subject =

| genre = Parody, Dialogue

| set_in =

| publisher =

| publisher2 =

| pub_date = 1864

| english_pub_date =

| published =

| media_type =

| pages =

| awards =

| isbn =

| isbn_note =

| oclc =

| dewey =

| congress =

| preceded_by =

| followed_by =

| native_wikisource =

| wikisource =

| notes =

| exclude_cover =

| website =

}}

The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu{{cite book|title=The Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu| first=Maurice | last=Joly |translator=John S. Waggoner|publisher=Lexington Books|year=2002|isbn=0-7391-0337-7}} (in the original French, Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu ou la politique de Machiavel au XIXe siècle) is a political satire written by French attorney Maurice Joly (initially released anonymously in Bruxelles, Belgium, under the generic label of "a contemporary") in protest against the regime of Napoleon III (a.k.a. Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte), who ruled France from 1848 to 1870. It was translated into English in 2002. Small portions were translated in 1967 as an appendix to Norman Cohn's Warrant for Genocide, which identifies it as the main source of the later Protocols of the Elders of Zion, though The Dialogue itself makes no mention of Jews.{{cite news |last=Graves |first=Philip |author-link=Philip Graves |date=August 16–18, 1921 |title=The Truth about the Protocols: A Literary Forgery |pages=23 |newspaper=The Times |place=London |url=https://archive.org/details/truthaboutthepro00londiala |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date=}}

The piece uses the literary device of a dialogue of the dead, invented by ancient Roman writer Lucian and introduced into the French belles-lettres by Bernard de Fontenelle in the 18th century. Shadows of the historical characters of Niccolò Machiavelli and Montesquieu meet in Hell in the year 1864 and dispute on politics. In this way Joly tried to cover up a direct, and then illegal, criticism of Louis-Napoleon's rule.

Summary

Joly relates in his 1870 autobiography{{cite book| author= Maurice Joly |title=Maurice Joly, son passé, son programme, par lui-même| publisher=Lacroix, Verbɶckhoven et Co.| location=Paris| year=1870| url= http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k113966c}} that one evening, while thinking of economist Abbé Galiani's treatise Dialogues sur le commerce des blés ("Dialogues on the commerce in wheat"){{cite book| first=Ferdinando | last= Galiani|author-link=Ferdinando Galiani|title = Dialogues sur le commerce des bleds| location=London| year=1770 |url=http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8626898f}} and walking by Pont Royal, he was inspired to write a dialogue between Montesquieu and Machiavelli. The noble baron Montesquieu would make the case for liberalism; the Florentine politician Machiavelli would present the case for despotism.

Machiavelli claims that he "... wouldn't even need twenty years to transform utterly the most indomitable European character and render it as a docile under tyranny as the debased people of Asia". Montesquieu insists that the liberal spirit of the peoples is invincible. In 25 dialogues, step by step, Machiavelli, who by Joly's plot covertly represents Napoleon III, explains how he would replace freedom with despotism in any given European country: "... Absolute power will no longer be an accident of fortune but will become a need" of the modern society. At the end, Machiavelli prevails. In the curtain-line Montesquieu exclaims "Eternal God, what have you permitted!...".

The book was published anonymously (par un contemporain, by a contemporary) in Brussels in 1864{{cite book|author= Maurice Joly|title=Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu ou la politique de Machiavel au XIX^e siècle|publisher=A. Mertens et fils|location=Bruxelles|year=1864| url= https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Dialogue_aux_enfers_entre_Machiavel_et_Montesquieu}} and smuggled into France for distribution, but the print run was seized by the police immediately upon crossing the border. The police swiftly tracked down its author, and Joly was arrested. The book was banned. On 25 April 1865, he was sentenced to 18 months at the Sainte-Pélagie Prison in Paris. The second edition of "Dialogues" was issued in 1868 under Joly's name.{{cite book|title=Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, ou la Politique au XIXe siècle, par un contemporain [Maurice Joly]| author= Maurice Joly |publisher=Tous les libraires|location=Bruxelles|year=1868|url=http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5427027b}}

Campaigning against Napoleon III at the 1870 French constitutional referendum, Joly wrote an epilogue to his "Dialogue". It was published at Le Gaulois

{{cite journal

| author = Maurice Joly

| date = 30 April 1870

| issue = 664

| pages = 2–3

| title = Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu. Épilogue.

| url = http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k519820w

| language = French

| journal = Le Gaulois: Littéraire et politique

| location = Paris

}}

and La Cloche

{{cite journal

| author = Maurice Joly

| title = Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu. Epilogue.

| language = French

| journal = La Cloche, 2 May 1870 – 10 May 1870

}}

magazines.

{{cite book

| author = F. Leclercq

| title = Le Plébiscite, épilogue du dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, précédé de César

| publisher = Paris-Zanzibar

| year = 1996

| isbn = 2-911314-02-6}}

Legacy

In the beginning of the 20th century Joly's book was used as a basis for The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,

{{cite book

| author = Сергей Нилус

| title = Великое в малом и антихрист, как близкая политическая возможность. Записки православного.

| location = Царское Село

| year = 1905}}

an infamous Russian-made antisemitic literary forgery. There is an abundance of evidence (some of which was presented at the Berne Trial) that The Protocols were lavishly plagiarized from The Dialogue.

{{cite web

| author =Kevin Schlottmann

| title = Guide to the Bern Trial on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion Collection

| website = Center for Jewish History

| publisher = Leo Baeck Institute

| date = July 17, 2013

| url = http://findingaids.cjh.org/?pID=477923#a23

| access-date = January 26, 2016 }}

{{cite book

|author = Herman Bernstein

|title = The Truth About "The Protocols of Zion". A Complete Exposure.

|publisher=Covici Friede

|location = New York

|year = 1935

|isbn = 978-0870681769}}

{{Cite book

| author =Alex Bein

| year = 1990

| page = 339

|title = The Jewish question: biography of a world problem

| isbn=978-0-8386-3252-9

| publisher = Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press}}

{{Cite book

| author1 = Steven Leonard Jacobs

| author2 = Mark Weitzman

| title = Dismantling the Big Lie: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

| year = 2003

| page = 15

| publisher = KTAV Publishing House

| isbn = 0-88125-785-0}}

{{cite book

| author = Cesare De Michelis

| author-link = Cesare G. De Michelis

|title = The Non-Existent Manuscript: a Study of the Protocols of the Sages of Zion, Studies in Antisemitism Series.

|publisher = University of Nebraska Press

|year = 2004

|isbn=0-8032-1727-7}}

Joly's book, however, was a satire on French politics of the Second Republic and Second Empire and contained no antisemitic material (or indeed any references to Jews at all); the anonymous authors of the Protocols interpolated a sinister Jewish cabal for the original's references to members of the government of Napoleon III.