Three Sisters (agriculture)

{{Short description|Agricultural technique of Indigenous people in the Americas}}

{{About|maize, beans, and squash|the variety of tomato|Three Sisters tomato}}

File:Three Sisters companion planting technique.jpg, climbing beans, and winter squash planted together]]

The Three Sisters ({{Langx|es|tres hermanas}}) are the three main agricultural crops of various indigenous people of Central and North America: squash, maize ("corn"), and climbing beans (typically tepary beans or common beans). In a technique known as companion planting, the maize and beans are often planted together in mounds formed by hilling soil around the base of the plants each year; squash is typically planted between the mounds. The cornstalk serves as a trellis for climbing beans, the beans fix nitrogen in their root nodules and stabilize the maize in high winds, and the wide leaves of the squash plant shade the ground, keeping the soil moist and helping prevent the establishment of weeds.

Indigenous peoples throughout North America cultivated different varieties of the Three Sisters, adapted to varying local environments.

The individual crops and their use in polyculture originated in Mesoamerica, where squash was domesticated first, followed by maize and then beans, over a period of 5,000–6,500 years. European records from the sixteenth century describe highly productive Indigenous agriculture based on cultivation of the Three Sisters throughout what are now the Eastern United States and Canada, where the crops were used for both food and trade.

Geographer Carl O. Sauer described the Three Sisters as "a symbiotic plant complex of North and Central America without an equal elsewhere".

Cultivation methods

File:2009NativeAmericanRev.jpg.{{r|US Mint}}]]

Agricultural history in the Americas differed from the Old World in that the Americas lacked large-seeded, easily domesticated grains (such as wheat and barley) and large domesticated animals that could be used for agricultural labor. At the time of first contact between the Europeans and the Americans, Carlos Sempat Assadourian writes that Europeans practiced "extensive agriculture, based on the plough and draught animals" while the Indigenous peoples of the Americas practiced "intensive agriculture, based on human labour".{{r|Sempat 1992}}

In Indigenous American companion planting, maize (Zea mays), beans (wild beans and vetches{{r|Putnam & Duke 1978}} spp.), and squash (Cucurbita pepo) are planted close together. The maize and beans are often planted together in mounds formed by hilling soil around the base of the plants each year; squash is typically planted between the mounds.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2006}} In the northeastern U.S., this practice increases soil temperature in the mound and improves drainage, both of which benefit maize planted in spring.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2006}}

In Haudenosaunee or Iroquois farming, the fields were not tilled, enhancing soil fertility and the sustainability of the cropping system by limiting soil erosion and oxidation of soil organic matter.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}} A modern experiment found that the Haudenosaunee Three Sisters polyculture provided both more energy and more protein than any local monoculture.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}}

The three crops benefit by being grown together.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2006|Putnam & Duke 1978}} The cornstalk serves as a trellis for the beans to climb; the beans fix nitrogen in the soil and their twining vines stabilize the maize in high winds; and the wide leaves of the squash plant shade the ground, keeping the soil moist and helping prevent the establishment of weeds.{{r|Young 2007|Hill 2020}} The prickly hairs of some squash varieties deter pests, such as deer and raccoons.{{r|Hill 2020}}

Although this synergy had been traditionally reputed among American cultures, scientific confirmation has arrived only much more recently.{{r|Putnam & Duke 1978}} Much of this research was performed in the Soviet Union in the early 1970s and published in several volumes of Biochemical and Physiological Bases for Plant Interactions in Phytocenosis edited by {{interlanguage link|Andrey Mikhailovich Grodzinsky|uk|Гродзинський Андрій Михайлович|ru|Гродзинский, Андрей Михайлович}}.{{r|Putnam & Duke 1978}} Dzubenko & Petrenko 1971, Lykhvar & Nazarova 1970 and Pronin et al. 1970 find a wide number of leguminous crops increase the growth and yield of maize, while Gulyaev et al. 1970 select later maturing lines of beans to produce the converse effect, increasing even further the yield gain of beans when planted with maize.{{r|Putnam & Duke 1978}} Pronin et al. 1972 find increased productivity and root exudate in both crops when combining faba beans with maize, and even more so in soils with preexisting high nitrogen fixing microorganism activity.{{r|Putnam & Duke 1978}}

File:Three Sisters mound culture in Arizona Mountains.jpg

Indigenous peoples throughout North America cultivated different varieties of the Three Sisters, adapted to varying local environments.{{r|Sauer 1969}}

The milpas of Mesoamerica are farms or gardens that employ companion planting on a larger scale.{{r|Mann 2005}} The Ancestral Puebloans adopted this garden design in the drier deserts and xeric shrublands environment. The Tewa and other peoples of the North American Southwest often included a "fourth Sister", the Rocky Mountain beeplant, which attracts bees to help pollinate the beans and squash.{{r|Hemenway 2000}} The Three Sisters crop model was widely used by a number of First Nations in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence Lowlands region.{{r|Optimizing Value}}

Productivity

European records from the sixteenth century describe highly productive Indigenous agriculture based on cultivation of the Three Sisters throughout what are now the Eastern United States and Canada, from Florida to Ontario.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}} The geographer Carl O. Sauer described the Three Sisters as "a symbiotic plant complex of North and Central America without an equal elsewhere".{{r|Sauer 1952}} The agronomist Jane Mt. Pleasant writes that the Three Sisters mound system "enhances the soil physical and biochemical environment, minimizes soil erosion, improves soil tilth, manages plant population and spacing, provides for plant nutrients in appropriate quantities, and at the time needed, and controls weeds".{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2006}} After several thousand years of selective breeding, the hemisphere's most important crop, maize, was more productive than Old World grain crops. Maize produced two and one-half times more calories per given land area than wheat and barley.{{r|Ensminger 1994}}

Nutritionally, maize, beans, and squash contain all nine essential amino acids.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}} The protein from maize is further enhanced by protein contributions from beans and pumpkin seeds, while pumpkin flesh provides large amounts of vitamin A; with the Three Sisters, farmers harvest about the same amount of energy as from maize monoculture, but get more protein yield from the inter-planted bean and pumpkin. Mt. Pleasant writes that this largely explains the value of the Three Sisters over monoculture cropping, as the system yields large amounts of energy, and at the same time increases protein yields; this polyculture cropping system yielded more food and supported more people per hectare compared to monocultures of the individual crops or mixtures of monocultures.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}}

= Yields =

Scholars Mt. Pleasant and Burt reproduced Iroquois methods of cultivation with Iroquoian varieties of maize at several locations in New York. They reported maize yields of 22 to 76 bushels per acre ({{convert|1232 to 4256|lb/acre|t/ha|disp=out|abbr=off|1}}). Soil fertility and weather were the main determinants of yield.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2010}} Mt. Pleasant also questioned the conventional wisdom that the Iroquois practiced slash-and-burn agriculture, abandoning fields when the soil was depleted of nutrients after several years of farming, but instead claimed that Iroquoian no-till farming techniques preserved soil fertility.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2011}} In a similar experiment to reproduce Native American agricultural practices in Minnesota, Munson-Scullin and Scullin reported that over three years, the per-acre annual maize yields declined from 40 to 30 to 25 bushels ({{convert|2240|,|1680|, and|1400|lb/acre|t/ha|disp=out|1}}).{{r|Munson-Scullin 2005}}

Other scholars have estimated lower average yields of maize. Hart and Feranec estimated the yield of Huron agriculture at 8 to 22 bushels per acre ({{convert|448 to 1232|lb/acre|t/ha|disp=out|1}}), the higher yields coming from newly cultivated land. The Huron lived in Ontario near the northern limit of where agriculture was feasible and had less fertile soils than many other regions. Nevertheless, they produced surpluses for trading with nearby non-agricultural peoples.{{r|Hart 2020}} Bruce Trigger estimates that the Hurons required {{cvt|.4|to|.8|acre|m2}} of land under cultivation per capita for their subsistence with more cultivated land required for trade.{{r|Trigger 1963}} Sissel Schroeder estimates that the average yield of Native American farms in the 19th century was 18.9 bushels per acre ({{convert|1058|lb/acre|t/ha|disp=out|1}}), but opines that pre-historic yields might have been as low as 10 bushels per acre ({{convert|560|lb/acre|t/ha|disp=out|1}}).{{r|Schroeder 1999}} As the Iroquois and other Native Americans did not plow their land, Mt. Pleasant and Burt concluded that their lands retained more organic matter and thus were higher in yields of maize than early Euro-American farms in North America.{{sfn|Mt. Pleasant|Burt|2010|page=62}}

Society and culture

Maize, beans, and squash, whether grown individually or together, have a very long history in the Americas.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}}

The process to develop the agricultural knowledge for cultivation took place over a 5,000 to 6,500 year period. Squash was domesticated first, with maize second and beans third.{{r|Landon 2008|Bushnell 1976}} Squash was first domesticated some 8,000–10,000 years ago.{{r|Smith 1997|UCLA}}

= Cahokian, Mississippian and Muscogee culture =

From 800 AD, Three Sisters crop organization was used in the largest Native American city north of the Rio Grande known as Cahokia, located in the Mississippi floodplain to the east of modern St. Louis, Missouri. It spanned over {{convert|13|km2|mi2}} and supported populations of at least thousands.{{r|Woods 2004}} Cahokia was notable for its delineated community zones, including those for administration, several residential areas, and a large agricultural complex. {{r|Woods 2004}} Domesticated squash, gourds, and maize were initially grown alongside wild beans; domesticated beans were not grown at Cahokia until 1250.{{r|Fritz 2019}} The cultivation of the Three Sisters crops by Cahokian residents produced a food surplus large enough to support Cahokia's expanded population, as well as further cultures throughout the extended Mississippi River system such as those of the Mississippian and Muscogee.{{r|Woods 2004}}

There is evidence that Cahokia held at least one great feast around 1050-1100 AD. The food served at these gatherings included, alongside a variety of other plants and animals, several domesticated squash varieties, maize, and wild beans.{{r|Fritz 2019}} Food that needed to be processed, like cornmeal, would commonly be prepared at the feast site alongside non-food items that gave the feasts ritual or ceremonial importance.{{r|Fritz 2019}}

Eventual overuse of the environment in the areas surrounding Cahokia began to degrade the land. As the surrounding woodlands were cleared through overuse, runoff frequently flooded the crop fields throughout the growing season, limiting the ability to grow the squash, maize, and corn Cahokia subsisted upon.{{r|Woods 2004}} By {{circa|1350}}, the Cahokia site had been mostly abandoned and the large population dispersed, though the Mississippian and Muscogee cultures continued to thrive until {{circa|1600}}, when contact with Spanish explorers brought Eurasian diseases, death, and cultural collapse.{{r|Woods 2004}}

= Haudenosaunee culture =

File:Grain pits.JPG]]

In the Handbook of North American Indians, the Three Sisters are called the "foundation of (Iroquois) subsistence", allowing the Haudenosaunee or Iroquois to develop the institutions of sedentary life.{{r|Fenton 1978}}

The Three Sisters appear prominently in Haudenosaunee oral traditions and ceremonies, such as Iroquois myths and the Haudenosaunee Thanksgiving Address.{{Cite web|date=March 16, 2020|title=The Thanksgiving Address - Earth to Tables Legacies|url=https://earthtotables.org/essays/the-thanksgiving-address/|publisher=Earth to Table Legacies}}

According to legend, the Three Sisters grew out of Earth Woman's dead body. During the time of creation, Sky Woman fell to Earth, where she had a daughter named Earth Woman. With the west wind, Earth Woman conceived twin sons. The first twin, Sapling, was born normally, but his evil twin brother, Flint, was so impatient that he came out of his mother's side, killing her during childbirth. As Earth Woman died, either she wished for her body to sustain the people{{Cite web|last=Us|first=Kimberly|date=November 14, 2021|title=Thanksgiving: Native American Stories, Recipes and Crafts|url=https://kimberlyus.com/thanksgiving-native-american-stories-recipes-and-crafts/|publisher=KimberlyUs.com}} or Sky Woman sowed on her grave the seeds she had brought when she fell to Earth, but never planted before.{{Cite web|last=Day|first=Ashley|date=November 20, 2023|title=3 Sisters to Invite to Thanksgiving|url=https://www.foodandwine.com/the-three-sisters-8404587|publisher=Food & Wine}} Out of Earth Woman's body parts grew various plants: the spirits of the corn, beans, and squash came from her breasts, hands, and navel respectively; sunflowers from her legs; strawberries from her heart; tobacco from her head; and purple potatoes or sunchokes from her feet.

It is said that in 1779, Seneca Chief Handsome Lake wished to die after the US military killed Haudenosaunee communities and villagers. Handsome Lake, grief-stricken, envisioned a visit by the spirits of the Three Sisters, prompting him to return to and re-teach his fellow Haudenosaunee their traditional agricultural practices.{{Cite web|last=Webster|first=Rebecca|date=February 20, 2024|title=How the famous Three Sisters survived - Rebecca Webster|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFRXY8bV_ug|publisher=YouTube}}

Researchers in the early 20th century described more than a dozen varieties of maize and similar numbers of bean varieties, as well as many types of squash, such as pumpkin and winter squash, grown in Haudenosaunee communities. The first academic description of the Three Sisters cropping system in 1910 reported that the Iroquois preferred to plant the three crops together, since it took less time and effort than planting them individually, and because they believed the plants were "guarded by three inseparable spirits and would not thrive apart".{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}}

Among the Haudenosaunee, women were responsible for cultivation and distribution of the three crops, which raised their social status. Male roles traditionally included extended periods of travel, such as for hunting expeditions, diplomatic missions, or military raids. Men took part in the initial preparation for the planting of the Three Sisters by clearing the planting ground, after which groups of related women, working communally, performed the planting, weeding, and harvesting.{{r|Bilharz 2002}}

Based on archaeological findings, paleobotanist John Hart concludes that the Haudenosaunee began growing the three crops as a polyculture sometime after 700 BP.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}}

The Haudenosaunee frequently traded their crops, so the need for each crop could vary substantially from year to year. Jane Mt. Pleasant surmises that the Haudenosaunee may have typically inter-planted the three crops, but they could also have planted monocultures of the individual crops to meet specific needs.{{r|Mt. Pleasant 2016}}

= Maya culture =

The Maya diet focused on the Three Sisters. Maize was the central component of the diet of the ancient Maya and figured prominently in Maya mythology and ideology. Archaeological evidence suggests that Chapalote-Nal-Tel was the dominant maize species, though it is likely others were being exploited also.{{r|Benz 1986}}

Folklore

Numerous legends from indigenous cultures surround the existence and production of the Three Sister crops.

One legend personifies the crops as three human sisters. The first sister, who represents beans, is described as a toddler dressed in green. The second sister, who represents squash, is a slightly older child dressed in a yellow Frock, or dress. The eldest of the three, who represents corn, is often described as wearing a pale green shawl and having long, yellow hair.

These three sisters are repeatedly visited by a young Indigenous boy, impressing them with his character and hunting skills, specifically archery. With each visit, one of the three sisters disappears until the eldest is left alone. As such, she begins to mourn. When the Indigenous boy visits again during the season of harvest, he overhears the eldest sister's cries and brings her back to his mother and father's lodge to cheer her up. There, the eldest is reunited with her sisters who had stayed with the Indigenous boy out of curiosity. From that point onwards, the three sisters never separated again.{{cite web |last1=Thomas |first1=Lois |date=n.d. |title=The Three Sisters: Corn, Beans and Squash |url=https://gardening.cals.cornell.edu/lessons/curriculum-classics/the-three-sisters-exploring-an-iroquois-garden/a-legend/ |website=Cornel Garden-based Learning |ref=none/}}

References

{{reflist|refs=

{{Cite thesis |title=Taxonomy and Evolution of Mexican Maize |last=Benz |first=Bruce F. |publisher=University of Wisconsin, Madison |year=1986 |oclc=17291438 |type=doctoral thesis}}

{{cite journal |last=Bushnell |first=G. H. S. |title=The Beginning and Growth of Agriculture in Mexico |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London |year=1976 |volume=275 |issue=936 |pages=117–120 |doi=10.1098/rstb.1976.0074 |bibcode=1976RSPTB.275..117B |doi-access= |issn=0261-0523}}

{{cite book |last=Bilharz |first=Joy |title=The Allegany Senecas and Kinzua Dam: forced relocation through two generations |publisher=University of Nebraska Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-8032-6203-4 |page=8}}

{{cite book |last1=Ensminger |first1=Audrey H. |last2=Ensminger |first2=M. E. |last3=Konlande |first3=James E. |last4=Robson |first4=John R. K. |title=Foods & Nutrition Encyclopedia |date=1994 |location=Boca Raton, Fla. |publisher=CRC Press |page=1104 |edition=2nd |isbn=0-8493-8980-1}}

{{cite book |last1=Fenton |first1=William N. |author1-link=William N. Fenton |editor1-last=Trigger |editor1-first=Bruce G. |title=Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast |date=1978 |publisher=Smithsonian Institution |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-0-1600-4575-2 |page=299 |chapter=Northern Iroquois Culture Patterns}}{{block indent|left=2|Cited in: {{harvp|Mt. Pleasant|2016|p=87|ps=.}} }}

{{cite journal |last1=Hart |first1=John P. |last2=Feranec |first2=Robert S. |title=Using Maize values to assess soil fertility in fifteenth and sixteenth and Iroquoian agricultural fields |journal=PLOS ONE |date=2020 |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=e0230952 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0230952 |pmid=32267852 |pmc=7141618 |doi-access=free |issn=1932-6203}}

{{Cite web |last=Hill |first=Christina Gish |date=2020-11-20 |title=Returning the 'three sisters' – corn, beans and squash – to Native American farms nourishes people, land and cultures |url=http://theconversation.com/returning-the-three-sisters-corn-beans-and-squash-to-native-american-farms-nourishes-people-land-and-cultures-149230 |access-date=2021-01-08 |website=The Conversation}}

{{cite book |last=Hemenway |first=Toby |year=2000 |title=Gaia's Garden: A Guide to Home-Scale Permaculture |publisher=Chelsea Green Publishing |location=White River Junction, Vt. |page=149 |isbn=978-1-890132-52-1}}

{{cite journal |last=Landon |first=Amanda J. |title=The 'How' of the Three Sisters: The Origins of Agriculture in Mesoamerica and the Human Niche |journal=Nebraska Anthropologist |year=2008 |url=https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/40/ |volume=23 |issn=1555-4937 |pages=110–124}}

{{cite book |last=Mann |first=Charles |title=1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus |year=2005 |pages=220–221 |publisher=Vintage Books |location=New York |isbn=978-1-4000-3205-1 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/149100char/page/220/mode/1up}}

{{cite book |last=Mt. Pleasant |first=Jane |editor1=Staller, John E. |editor2=Tykot, Robert H. |editor3=Benz, Bruce F. |title=Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Prehistory, Linguistics, Biogeography, Domestication, and Evolution of Maize |publisher=Academic Press |location=Amsterdam |year=2006 |pages=529–537 |isbn=978-0-1236-9364-8 |chapter=The science behind the Three Sisters mound system: An agronomic assessment of an indigenous agricultural system in the northeast}}

{{cite journal |last1=Mt. Pleasant |first1=Jane |last2=Burt |first2=Robert F. |title=Estimating Productivity of Traditional Iroquoian Cropping Systems from Field Experiments and Historical Literature |journal=Journal of Ethnobiology |date=2010 |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=54 |doi=10.2993/0278-0771-30.1.52 |s2cid=85696505 |doi-access= |issn=2162-4496}}

{{cite journal |last1=Mt. Pleasant |first1=Jane |title=The Paradox of Plows and Productivity |journal=Agricultural History |date=2011 |volume=85 |issue=4 |page=470 |doi=10.3098/ah.2011.85.4.460 |jstor=10.3098/ah.2011.85.4.460 |pmid=22180940 |issn=1533-8290}}

{{Cite journal |last=Mt. Pleasant |first=Jane |date=2016 |title=Food Yields and Nutrient Analyses of the Three Sisters: A Haudenosaunee Cropping System |journal=Ethnobiology Letters |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=87–98 |doi=10.14237/ebl.7.1.2016.721 |doi-access=free |issn=2159-8126 |jstor=26423653 |jstor-access=free}}

{{cite journal |last1=Munson-Scullin |first1=Wendy |last2=Scullin |first2=Michael |title=Potential Productivity of Midwestern Native American Gardens |journal=Plains Anthropologist |date=2005 |volume=50 |issue=193 |pages=9, 15 |doi=10.1179/pan.2005.004 |jstor=25670789 |s2cid=163713333 |issn=0032-0447}}

{{Cite web |title=The Three Sisters: Optimizing the value and food potential of an ancestral indigenous crop system |publisher=Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |publication-place=Ottawa |date=2021-08-06 |url=https://agriculture.canada.ca/en/news-agriculture-and-agri-food-canada/scientific-achievements-agriculture/three-sisters-optimizing-value-and-food-potential-ancestral-indigenous-crop-system |access-date=2022-10-14}}

{{cite journal |last1=Putnam |first1=A. R. |last2=Duke |first2=W. B. |title=Allelopathy in Agroecosystems |journal=Annual Review of Phytopathology |volume=16 |issue=1 |year=1978 |issn=0066-4286 |doi=10.1146/annurev.py.16.090178.002243 |pages=431–451}}

{{cite book |last1=Sauer |first1=Carl O. |title=Agricultural origins and dispersals |date=1952 |publisher=M.I.T. Press |location=Cambridge, Mass. |page=64 |edition=1st |oclc=1086141375}}{{block indent|left=2|Cited in: {{harvp|Mt. Pleasant|2016|p=87|ps=.}} }}

{{cite book |last1=Sauer |first1=Carl O. |title=Agricultural origins and dispersals: the domestication of animals and foodstuffs |date=1969 |publisher=M.I.T. Press |location=Cambridge, Mass. |pages=64–66 |edition=2nd |oclc=3917 |url=https://archive.org/details/agriculturalorig0000saue/page/64/mode/1up |url-access=registration}}

{{cite journal |last1=Schroeder |first1=Sissel |title=Maize Productivity in the Eastern Woodlands and Great Plains of North America |journal=American Antiquity |date=1999 |volume=64 |issue=2 |pages=499–516 |doi=10.2307/2694148 |jstor=2694148 |s2cid=164003793 |issn=2325-5064}}

{{cite journal |last=Sempat Assadourian |first=Carlos |title=The Colonial Economy: The Transfer of the European System of Production to New Spain and Peru |journal=Journal of Latin American Studies |date=1992 |volume=24 |issue=Quincentenary Supplement |page=62 |jstor=156945 |issn=0022-216X}}

{{cite journal |last=Smith |first=Bruce D. |date=1997 |title=The Initial Domestication of Cucurbita pepo in the Americas 10,000 Years Ago |journal=Science |doi=10.1126/science.276.5314.932 |volume=276 |issue=5314 |pages=932–934 |issn=0036-8075}}

{{cite journal |last1=Trigger |first1=Bruce Graham |title=Settlement as an Aspect of Iroquoian Adaptation at the Time of Conquest |journal=American Anthropologist |date=1963 |volume=65 |issue=1 |pages=90–93 |doi=10.1525/aa.1963.65.1.02a00070 |issn=0002-7294}}

{{cite web |title=Cucurbitaceae--Fruits for Peons, Pilgrims, and Pharaohs |date=n.d. |publisher=Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden, University of California at Los Angeles |url=http://www.botgard.ucla.edu/html/botanytextbooks/economicbotany/Cucurbita/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016003715/http://www.botgard.ucla.edu/html/botanytextbooks/economicbotany/Cucurbita/ |archive-date=October 16, 2013 |url-status=dead}}

{{cite web |url=https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/native-american-dollar-coins/2009-three-sisters-agriculture |title=2009 Native American $1 Coin |publisher=United States Mint |date=n.d. |access-date=April 5, 2023}}

{{cite book |last1=Young |first1=Kim J. |editor1-last=Hopkins |editor1-first=William G. |title=Ethnobotany |date=2007 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |location=New York |isbn=978-1-4381-0694-6 |pages=57–58 |series=The Green World}}

{{cite journal |last=Woods |first=William I. |date=2004 |title=Population nucleation, intensive agriculture, and environmental degradation: The Cahokia example |journal=Agriculture and Human Values |volume=21 |issue=2/3 |pages=255–259 |doi=10.1023/B:AHUM.0000029398.01906.5e |s2cid=153665089 |issn=0889-048X}}

{{cite book |last=Fritz |first=Gayle |date=2019 |title=Feeding Cahokia: early agriculture in the North American heartland |publisher=The University Of Alabama Press |location=Tuscaloosa |pages=74–118 |isbn=9780817392178}}

}}