Timothy King

{{other people}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2021}}

Sir Timothy Roger Alan King (born 5 April 1949), styled The Hon. Mr Justice King, is a retired judge of the High Court of England and Wales assigned to the Queen's Bench Division.{{cite web |url=http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/judges-magistrates-and-tribunal-judges/list-of-members-of-the-judiciary/senior-judiciary-list#headingAnchor5 |title=Judiciary of England and Wales – List of members of the judiciary – Senior judiciary |publisher=judiciary.gov.uk |accessdate=14 December 2010 }}

Career as counsel

King was educated at the Liverpool Institute and Lincoln College, Oxford, where he achieved the degrees of MA and BCL.[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20091208044520/http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page10984 Knighthood conferred upon Timothy King] He was called to the Bar in 1973 by Lincoln's Inn and practised on the Northern Circuit, taking silk in 1991.{{cite web |url=http://www.thelawyer.com/swathe-of-qcs-gifted-high-court-appointments/123571.article |title=Swathe of QCs gifted High Court appointments |work= The Lawyer |publisher=thelawyer.com |accessdate=14 December 2010 }}

=Notable cases as counsel=

  • 2001: R v Liverpool City Council, ex parte Karl Barry (Court of Appeal) on the limitations of local authority to license "doormen".{{cite web |url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/384.html&query=%22Timothy+and+King%22&method=boolean |title=Barry, R (on the application of) v Liverpool City Council [2001] EWCA Civ 384 (21 March 2001) |publisher=bailii.org |accessdate=14 December 2010 }}
  • 2004: R ex app. PD v West Midlands and North West Mental Health Review Tribunal (Court of Appeal) - on apparent or perceived bias of members of mental health tribunals.{{cite web |url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/311.html&query=%22Timothy+and+King%22&method=boolean |title=PD, R (on the application of) v West Midlands and North West Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWCA Civ 311 (17 March 2004) |publisher=bailii.org |accessdate=14 December 2010 }}
  • 2006: King defended BNP leaders Nick Griffin and Mark Collett at Leeds Crown Court on charges of inciting racial hatred. Their defence was based upon political freedom of speech. The defendants were acquitted of some charges at the initial trial, with the jury in that trial failing to reach a verdict on the remaining counts, at a re-trial they were acquitted of the remaining counts.{{cite web |url=http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/BNP-Pair-Cleared-Of-Race-Hate-Charges/Article/200611213551612?lid=ARTICLE_13551612_BNP%20Pair%20Cleared%20Of%20Race%20Hate%20Charges&lpos=searchresults |title=BNP Pair Cleared of Race Hate Charges |publisher=Sky UK |accessdate=14 December 2010 }}
  • 2006: Jones v Whalley (House of Lords): King argued about the effects of a police caution on subsequent proceedings.{{cite web |url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/41.html&query=%22Timothy+and+King%22&method=boolean |title=Jones v. Whalley [2006] UKHL 41 (26 July 2006) |publisher=bailii.org |accessdate=14 December 2010 }}

Career as judge

King was appointed to the High Court bench on 29 January 2007, and awarded a knighthood on 28 June the same year.[http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/58388/pages/9911 London Gazette]

In March 2013 he was formally reprimanded by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, and Lord Chancellor, Chris Grayling MP, following a complaint. The Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) gave little details about the complaint it received about Queen's Bench Division judge Mr Justice King other than to say that it regarded a late handing down of a judgment.[https://www.thelawyer.com/issues/online-february-2013/king-j-reprimanded-over-unacceptable-delays-to-judgment/] On 3 August 2016 the Judicial Conducts Investigation Office issued the following statement "The Right Honourable Mr Justice Timothy King has been subject to an investigation into his conduct in respect of a delay in producing a judgment. The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice found that the delay was unacceptable and concluded that Mr Justice King’s behaviour in respect of this matter fell below the standards expected of a member of the Judiciary. Mr Justice King has been issued with a reprimand".[http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk/app/uploads/2016/08/JCIO-press-statement-Mr-Justice-Timothy-King-1.pdf]

References