Topcoder Open
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2021}}
{{advert|date=April 2018}}
{{Infobox recurring event
| logo = 2023_topcoder_open_logo.svg
| name = Topcoder Open (TCO)
| logo_caption = 2023 Topcoder Open logo
| frequency = Annually
| country = United States
| years_active = 2001–2023
| first = November 2–3, 2001
| last = November 17–19, 2022
| activity = Competitive programming, data science, design, software development
| organized = Topcoder
| website = {{URL|https://tco23.topcoder.com}}
}}
Topcoder Open (TCO) was an annual design, software development, data science and competitive programming championship organized by Topcoder, and hosted in different venues around the United States.{{Cite news|url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2538717/app-development/rock-star-coders.html|title=Rock star coders|last=Brandel|first=Mary|date=January 22, 2008|work=Computerworld|access-date=April 29, 2018}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2552789/it-management/jiazhi-wu--programming-s-crack-competitor.html|title=Jiazhi Wu: Programming's Crack Competitor|last=Lai|first=Eric|date=July 9, 2007|work=Computerworld|access-date=April 29, 2018}}{{Cite news|url=https://medium.com/programming-and-algorithms-iitr/programming-as-a-sport-a5e75d292cab|title=Programming as a sport|last=Grover|first=Sahil|date=December 2, 2017|work=Medium|access-date=April 30, 2017}} In the first two years, 2001 and 2002, the tournament was titled TopCoder Invitational.
In addition to the main championship, from 2001 to 2007, Topcoder organized an annual TopCoder Collegiate Challenge tournament, for college students only.{{Cite news|url=http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/topcoder-141267.html?printOnly=1|title=TopCoders Vie For College Crown|last=Meloan|first=Steve|date=April 2003|work=Oracle Technology Network|access-date=April 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180430120057/http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/topcoder-141267.html?printOnly=1|archive-date=30 April 2018}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/196525/college_coders_vie_cash_enterprise-sponsored_contest/|title=College coders vie for cash in enterprise-sponsored contest|last=Kanaracus|first=Chris|date=October 1, 2007|work=Computerworld|access-date=April 30, 2018}} The TopCoder High School competition was held from 2007 to 2010.
From 2015, Topcoder Regional events were held through the year in different countries.{{Cite news|url=http://innovation.ifmo.ru/en/news_page/841/|title=TopCoder Open 2016|date=September 5, 2016|work=ITMO Tech|access-date=April 30, 2018}}
In 2020–2023, in-person Topcoder Open finals were cancelled and replaced by virtual events due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent economic slowdown. The 2023 Topcoder Open was the final edition of the contest.{{Cite web |date=February 24, 2023 |title=FAQ - TOPCODER COMMUNITY TOWN HALL WITH DOUG HANSON, TOPCODER CEO |url=https://discussions.topcoder.com/discussion/26097/faq-topcoder-community-town-hall-with-doug-hanson-topcoder-ceo |access-date=February 25, 2023 |website=Topcoder}}
Competition tracks
Competition tracks included in the Topcoder Open tournament changed through its history. Many of them resemble the types of challenges offered to Topcoder Community through the year, but there is no 1:1 match. Here is the alphabetical list of all competition tracks ever present at TCO:
= Algorithm Competition (SRM) =
Timeline: 2001 – 2022
Champions: {{Flagicon|Belarus}} Gennady Korotkevich tourist (2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2014); {{Flagicon|Russia}} Petr Mitrichev Petr (2018, 2015, 2013, 2006); {{Flagicon|China}} Yuhao Du xudyh (2017); {{Flagicon|Japan}} Makoto Soejima rng_58 (2016, 2011, 2010); {{Flagicon|Russia}} Egor Kulikov Egor (2012); {{Flagicon|China}} Bin Jin crazyb0y (2009); {{Flagicon|Poland}} {{Ill|Tomasz Czajka|pl|Tomasz Czajka}} tomek (2008, 2004, 2003); {{Flagicon|Netherlands}} Jan Kuipers Jan_Kuipers (2007); {{Flagicon|Poland}} {{Ill|Eryk Kopczyński|pl|Eryk Kopczyński}} Eryx (2005); {{Flagicon|Australia}} John Dethridge John Dethridge (2002); {{Flagicon|USA}} jonmac (2001).
Details:
This was the only track that was present at all main TCO events and at most of the other Topcoder events. It followed the format of regular 1.5 hours Single Round Matches:{{Cite web|url=https://help.topcoder.com/hc/en-us/articles/115006162527-SRM-Overview|title=SRM Overview|last=Sial|first=Rashid|date=April 25, 2017|website=Topcoder Help Center|access-date=April 23, 2018}}
- The Coding Phase – 75 mins: All competitors were presented with the same three algorithmic problems of differing complexity. Each problem had its own maximal number of points. Problem descriptions were initially invisible. Competitors had 75 minutes to solve these problems. A competitor could open any problem description in any order; once they opened a problem, the number of points they could get for the correct solution of that problem started decreasing over time. When the competitor submitted the problem solution—a code that successfully compiles—they were awarded with the current number of points they could get for that problem. They could re-submit a solution, getting the further decrease number of points, minus extra penalty for the resubmission. During this coding phase, competitors could see the current points awarded to each participant, but they could not see whether the solutions of those participants were correct or incorrect, including whether these scores would hold after The System Testing Phase or if they would be reset.
- The Challenge Phase – 15 mins: Each competitor could see all submissions completed by the other competitors. They could optionally challenge any of them by submitting test cases that would cause other competitor's submission to produce an incorrect result. Submission of a correct challenge test case gave the submitter a 50 points award, but submission of an incorrect test case (i.e. the challenged solution can solve it successfully) would lead to 25 points penalty for the test case submitter.
- The System Testing Phase – In the last phase, system tests were automatically executed for all of the submissions from all competitors. If a submission failed testing, the scores awarded for that submission during The Coding Phase were reset to zero. The final scores after the system testing determined the winner.
= First to Finish (F2F) =
Timeline: 2009 – 2014, 2016 – 2022
Champions: {{Flagicon|Turkey}} Fatih Tas neonray (2022); {{Flagicon|Greece}} Thomas Kranitsas thomaskranitsas (2021); {{Flagicon|Brazil}} Victor Roberto Gomes da Cunha cunhavictor (2020); {{Flagicon|Nepal}} Dilip Kumar Thapa veshu (2019); {{Flagicon|Russia}} Dmitry Kondakov kondakovdmitry (2018); {{Flagicon|Nigeria}} Akinwale Ariwodola akinwale (2017, 2014); {{Flagicon|China}} vvvpig (2016); {{Flagicon|India}} Pratap Koritala supercharger (2013); {{Flagicon|China}} Lan Luo hohosky (2012); {{Flagicon|China}} Yang Li Yeung (2011); {{Flagicon|Ukraine}} Margaryta Skrypachova Margarita (2010); {{Flagicon|China}} Ninghai Huang PE (2009).
Details:
This was officially called Mod Dash from 2009 to 2013, and First2Finish from then on. Competitors were provided with a set of small programming tasks, such as bug fixes or enhancements in an existing codebase, and they received scores based on who correctly solved each task first. The exact rules for on-site competition varied from year to year.
= Information Architecture =
= Marathon Match (MM) =
Timeline: 2007 – 2022
Champions: {{Flagicon|Poland}} {{Ill|Przemysław Dębiak|pl|Przemysław Dębiak}} Psyho (2022, 2017, 2016, 2014, 2013, 2011, 2008); {{Flagicon|Romania}} Catalin-Stefan Tiseanu CatalinT (2021);{{Flagicon|Japan}} Hironao Tsutsumida iehn (2020); {{Flagicon|Belarus}} Gennady Korotkevich tourist (2019, 2018); {{Flagicon|China}} Tiancheng Lou ACRush (2015); {{Flagicon|South Korea}} Won-Seok Yoo ainu7 (2012); {{Flagicon|Japan}} Yoichi Iwata wata (2010); {{Flagicon|Russia}} Andrey Lopatin KOTEHOK (2009); {{Flagicon|Poland}} Mateusz Zotkiewicz Mojito1 (2007).
Details:
This was officially called Marathon from 2007 to 2022. It followed the format of regular MM competitions: 1–2 weeks for online competitions or 1 day during on-site competitions. Competitors were provided with the same algorithmic or data science problem, which was judged objectively with a live leaderboard which was visible to everyone. Each competitor could submit multiple times with no penalties, with the goal to submit a code that scores the maximal possible amount of scores on that problem. During the competition, the leaderboard was generated based on submissions testing against a limited number of test cases, and, after the contest, the final results were determined with testing against a larger test dataset.
= Quality Assurance Competition (QA) =
Timeline: 2019 – 2022
Champions: {{Flagicon|Sri Lanka}} Nuwan Gunarathne codejam (2022, 2021, 2020); {{Flagicon|Latvia}} Vladimir Timofejev v.t. (2019)
Details:
The QA competition included structured and unstructured testing, structured test case writing, and automated testing.
= Software Design =
Timeline: 2004–2014
Champions: {{Flagicon|China}} Meng Wang albertwang (2014, 2013); {{Flagicon|Canada}} Michael Paweska argolite (2012, 2010); {{Flagicon|China}} WuJian Ye BLE (2011); {{Flagicon|Ukraine}} Olexiy Sadovnikov saarixx (2009); {{Flagicon|USA}} Tim Roberts Pops (2008, 2006); {{Flagicon|USA}} Sergey Kalinchenko kyky (2007); {{Flagicon|Russia}} Nikolay Archak nicka81 (2005); {{Flagicon|Romania}} Adrian Carcu adic (2004).
Details:
This was officially called Component Design from 2004 to 2009, and Design from 2010 to 2014. Competitors were asked to take client requirements for a software component or product as input and produce development documentation or technical specifications. Solutions were evaluated by a panel of judges according to objective scorecards.
= Software Development =
Timeline: 2004 – 2022
Champions: {{Flagicon|China}} xxcxy (2022); {{Flagicon|China}} Jiang Liwu jiangliwu (2021, 2019); {{Flagicon|Spain}} Dr. Sergey Pogodin birdofpreyru (2020, 2017); {{Flagicon|Vietnam}} Ngoc Pham ngoctay (2018); {{Flagicon|Poland}} Łukasz Sentkiewicz Sky_ (2016, 2015, 2014); {{Flagicon|China}} Zhijie Liu morehappiness (2013); {{Flagicon|China}} Yang Li Yeung (2012, 2010); {{Flagicon|Philippines}} Franklin Guevarra j3_guile (2011); {{Flagicon|China}} GuanZhuo Jin Standlove (2009 – Architecture, 2004); {{Flagicon|Argentina}} Pablo Wolfus pulky (2009 – Assembly); {{Flagicon|China}} Yanbo Wu assistant (2009 – Component Development); {{Flagicon|Canada}} Piotr Paweska AleaActaEst (2009 – Specification); {{Flagicon|Brazil}} Romano Silva romanoTC (2008); {{Flagicon|China}} Feng He hefeng (2007); {{Flagicon|Indonesia}} Sindunata Sudarmagi sindu (2006); {{Flagicon|China}} Qi Liu visualage (2005).
Details:
This was officially called Component Development from 2004 to 2009, and Development from 2010 to 2022. The actual rules differed from year to year, but, typically, competitors were presented with technical specifications for development of a software component, application, or tool, or they were presented with more open, hackathon-style requirements, which they must implement in the best possible way in 4 hours. Submitted solutions were evaluated by a panel of judges according to objective scorecards.
= UI Design =
Timeline: 2007 – 2022
Champions: {{Flagicon|Thailand}} Teeraporn Sriponpak iamtong (2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2012); {{Flagicon|India}} L. O. I. (2019); {{Flagicon|Indonesia}} Panji Kharisma kharm (2017); {{Flagicon|Indonesia}} Junius Albertho abedavera (2016, 2015, 2013, 2011); {{Flagicon|Indonesia}} Faridah Amalia Mandaga fairy_ley (2014); {{Flagicon|Indonesia}} Tri Joko Rubiyanto djackmania (2010); {{Flagicon|Australia}} Dale Napier djnapier (2009); {{Flagicon|Philippines}} Nino Rey Ronda oninkxronda (2008); {{Flagicon|China}} Yiming Liao yiming (2007).
Details:
The event was officially called Studio from 2007 to 2014, and UI Design from 2015 onwards. Competitors, provided with client requirements, were asked to create the best user interface design for a software product.
= UI Prototype =
Timeline: 2015–2018
Champions: {{Flagicon|Sri Lanka}} Mouly Gunarathne moulyg (2018, 2017, 2016); {{Flagicon|Sri Lanka}} Dileepa Balasuriya dileepa (2015).
Details:
Competitors were provided with design specifications for a website or web-application, and they were required to create a working prototype of the frontend within approximately 4 hours. The resulting submissions were judged against objective scorecards.
List of Topcoder Open events
These are the main Topcoder Open events where champions were determined.
Topcoder Open victories by countries represented by champions
| class="wikitable mw-collapsible"
! colspan="11" |Topcoder Open Victories by Countries Represented by ChampionsUpdated up to TCO22, inclusive |
| rowspan="2" |Country
! rowspan="2" |Total |
|---|
| Dev
!Dg !F2F !IA !MM !Pr !QA !SDg !SRM |
| {{Flagicon|Argentina}} Argentina
|1 |1 | | | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Australia}} Australia
|2 | |1 | | | | | | |1 |
| {{Flagicon|Belarus}} Belarus
|7 | | | | |2 | | | |5 |
| {{Flagicon|Brazil}} Brazil
|2 |1 | |1 | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Canada}} Canada
|3 |1 | | | | | | |2 | |
| {{Flagicon|China}} China
|22 |11 |1 |4 | |1 | | |3 |2 |
| {{Flagicon|Greece}} Greece
|1 | | |1 | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|India}} India
|2 | |1 |1 | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Indonesia}} Indonesia
|8 |1 |7 | | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Japan}} Japan
|5 | | | | |2 | | | |3 |
| {{Flagicon|Latvia}} Latvia
|1 | | | | | | |1 | | |
| {{Flagicon|Nepal}} Nepal
|1 | | |1 | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Netherlands}} Netherlands
|1 | | | | | | | | |1 |
| {{Flagicon|Nigeria}} Nigeria
|2 | | |2 | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Philippines}} Philippines
|2 |1 |1 | | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Poland}} Poland
|15 |3 | | | |8 | | | |4 |
| {{Flagicon|Romania}} Romania
|2 | | | | |1 | | |1 | |
| {{Flagicon|Russia}} Russia
|8 | | |1 | |1 | | |1 |5 |
| {{Flagicon|South Korea}} South Korea
|1 | | | | |1 | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Spain}} Spain
|3 |2 | | |1 | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Sri Lanka}} Sri Lanka
|7 | | | | | |4 |3 | | |
| {{Flagicon|Thailand}} Thailand
|5 | |5 | | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Turkey}} Turkey
|1 | | |1 | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|Ukraine}} Ukraine
|2 | | |1 | | | | |1 | |
| {{Flagicon|Vietnam}} Vietnam
|1 |1 | | | | | | | | |
| {{Flagicon|USA}} USA
|4 | | | | | | | |3 |1 |
Notes
{{reflist|group=note}}
References
{{reflist}}