Two-pass verification
File:Keypunching at Texas A&M2.jpg keypunch machine. The woman at left is at an IBM 056 Card Verifier. She would re-enter the data and the '056 verifier machine would check that it matched the data punched onto the cards.]]
Two-pass verification, also called double data entry, is a data entry quality control method that was originally employed when data records were entered onto sequential 80-column Hollerith cards with a keypunch. In the first pass through a set of records, the data keystrokes were entered onto each card as the data entry operator typed them. On the second pass through the batch, an operator at a separate machine, called a verifier, entered the same data. The verifier compared the second operator's keystrokes with the contents of the original card. If there were no differences, a verification notch was punched on the right edge of the card.{{cite web | url=http://www.museumwaalsdorp.nl/computer/en/punchcards.html | title=Everything about punch cards | date=December 28, 2012 | accessdate=June 20, 2013}}
The IBM 056 and 059 Card Verifiers were companion machines to the IBM 026 and 029 keypunches, respectively. The later IBM 129 keypunch also could operate as a verifier. In that mode, it read a completed card (record) and loaded the 80 keystrokes into a buffer. A data entry operator reentered the record and the keypunch compared the new keystrokes with those loaded into the buffer. If a discrepancy occurred the operator was given a chance to reenter that keystroke and ultimately overwrite the entry in the buffer. If all keystrokes matched the original card, it was passed through and received a verification punch. If corrections were required, then the operator was prompted to discard the original card and insert a fresh card on which corrected keystrokes were typed. The corrected record (card) was passed through and received a corrected verification punch.{{cite web| url=http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/IBM-ProdAnn/129.pdf | title=IBM 129 Data Card Recorder | access-date=2024-02-08}}
Modern use
While this method of quality control clearly is not proof against systematic errors or operator misread entries from a source document, it is very useful in catching and correcting random miskeyed strokes which occur even with experienced data entry operators. However, it proved to be a fatally tragic flaw in the Therac 25 incident. This method has survived the keypunch and is available in some currently available data entry programs (e.g. PSPP/SPSS Data Entry). One study suggests that, at least in simulated circumstances, a single-pass data entry with range checks and {{clarify|text=skip rules|date=October 2024}} might not significantly alter the reliability of outcomes compared to studies using two-pass data entry;{{cite journal |last1=Day |first1=Simon |title=Double Data Entry: What Value, What Price? |journal=Controlled Clinical Trials |year=1998 |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=15–24 |doi=10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00096-2 |pmid=9492966 }} however, it is desirable to implement both systems in a data entry application.