Unbanked

{{short description|Adults who do not have their own bank accounts}}

{{mi|

{{Globalize|date=September 2012}}

{{More citations needed|date=September 2024}}

}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2025}}

The unbanked are adults who do not have their own bank accounts. Along with the underbanked, they may rely on alternative financial services for their financial needs, where these are available.

Causes

Some reasons a person might not have a bank account include:{{fact|date=October 2021}}

  • Lack of access via a nearby bank branch or mobile phone
  • Minimum balance fees
  • Distrust of the banking system, typically due to lack of transparency regarding fees and deposit timing[https://think.kera.org/2017/01/23/the-unbanking-of-america/ The Unbanking Of America] - Think interview with economist Lisa Servon
  • No access to government-issued ID, which is required to open a bank account
  • To avoid delinquent debts, such as creditors seizing the account in judgements, or the government collecting back taxes or child support

The unbanked in the United States

The unbanked are described by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as those adults without an account at a bank or other financial institution and are considered to be outside the mainstream for one reason or another. The Federal Reserve estimated there are 55 million unbanked or underbanked adult Americans in 2018, which account for 22 percent of U.S. households.{{Cite web|title=The Fed - Banking and Credit|url=https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/2019-economic-well-being-of-us-households-in-2018-banking-and-credit.htm|access-date=2 August 2021|website=Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System|language=en}}{{cite news |last=Holder |first=Sarah |url=https://www.citylab.com/equity/2019/06/cleveland-post-office-banking-cash-check-predatory-lending/590557/ |title=Why Cleveland Wants to Bring Back Postal Banking |work=CITYLAB |publisher=The Atlantic Monthly Group |date=4 June 2019 |access-date=5 June 2019 }}

In a 2025 working paper released by the Federal Reserve, Falcettoni and Nygaard argue for classifying individuals without a bank account according to their interest in having one. The new measure proposed in the paper would classify the unbanked as those that are not currently banked but are interested in having a bank account. By contrast, those who are not banked and not interested in being banked would make up the out of banking population. Using FDIC data, Falcettoni and Nygaard show that these two groups differ in policy-relevant ways. While the unbanked mostly cite financial and past credit or banking history problems as reasons for not having a bank account, the out of banking population cites a growing mistrust toward the traditional banking system.{{Cite journal |last1=Falcettoni |first1=Elena |last2=Nygaard |first2=Vegard |date=May 2025 |title=Refining the Definition of the Unbanked |url=https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/refining-the-definition-of-the-unbanked.htm |journal=Finance and Economics Discussion Series |issue=2025–033 |pages=1 |doi=10.17016/FEDS.2025.033 |issn=1936-2854|doi-access=free }}{{source-attribution}}

Data from 2009 showed the nationwide rates in the US to be 7.7% unbanked and 17.9% underbanked, with the most unbanked state Mississippi, at 16.4%. Places where over 20% of residents have no bank accounts include Miami, Florida; Detroit, Michigan; Laredo, Texas; Newark, New Jersey; Hialeah, Florida; Hidalgo County, Texas; The Bronx; and Cameron County, Texas. Many counties with fewer than 100,000 residents had even higher rates, including Starr County, Texas, at 32.7%. Some census tracts in Savannah, Georgia; Cleveland, Ohio; Nashville, Tennessee; and Atlanta, Georgia had over 40% unbanked residents.{{cite web|url=http://cfed.org/assets/pdfs/Most_Unbanked_Places_in_America.pdf|title=The Most Unbanked Places in America|access-date=21 May 2025 |author=Corporation for Enterprise Development |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120616180321/http://cfed.org/assets/pdfs/Most_Unbanked_Places_in_America.pdf |archive-date=16 June 2012 |url-status=dead}}

The majority of the unbanked and underbanked individuals are American-born, with a growing number being immigrants. Both groups share low income as a common characteristic and lack the minimum balance required to open checking and savings accounts.

{{cite magazine

| title = Profiting from the Unbanked

| magazine = TIME

| first = Anita

| last = Hamilton

| date = 16 August 2007

| url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1653666,00.html | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070823185032/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1653666,00.html | url-status = dead | archive-date = 23 August 2007 }}

According to Congressman Rubén Hinojosa, half of the unbanked had a bank account previously but are choosing not to have an account and opting to using the services of check cashers and payday lenders instead. Research has shown that immigrants who have experienced a banking crisis in their countries of origin are significantly less likely to have bank accounts in the U.S.,Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, [http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/working_papers/2008/wp2008_17.pdf Bank Crises and Investor Confidence], November 2008 and researchers also found that lower rates of financial market participation tend to persist even for immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for several years.[http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/working_papers/2004/wp2004_18.pdf "Immigrant-Native Differences in Financial Market Participation"], Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, December 2006 Attributes that contribute to these decisions, however, vary for each racial/ethnic group.Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, [http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/working_papers/2003/wp2003-10.pdf The Importance of Check-Cashing Businesses to the Unbanked: Racial/Ethnic Differences], August 2003

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger started the Bank on California initiative to help the unbanked in 2008. Previously, in 2001, a financial education curriculum called Money Smart was launched by the FDIC to help the financially unsavvy.

{{cite web

| title = Money Smart - A Financial Education Program

| publisher = Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

| url = http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/moneysmart/

| access-date = 21 February 2009 }}

Economist Lisa Servon comments that lack of financial education as a reason for using services other than banks is often an inaccurate stereotype.

Prior to becoming the FDIC chair in 2006, Sheila Bair ran a research project for the Inter-American Development Bank at the University of Massachusetts Amherst to discover ways to help unbanked Latin American immigrants use the U.S. banking system. She found that the primary reason recent Latino immigrants often do not use banks to remit money is because they are undocumented. Around the same time, the Treasury Department put in place Section 326 regulations that allow banks and credit unions to accept identification from foreign governments at their own discretion.

{{cite web

| title = Hearings before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit "Serving the Underserved: Initiatives to Broaden Access to the Financial Mainstream"

| publisher = The United States House of Representatives

| url = http://financialservices.house.gov/media/pdf/062603sb.pdf

| date = 26 June 2003 }} Banks like Mitchell Bank in Milwaukee have taken up the Treasury Department on their relaxing of identification standards. They have even "offered pamphlets on how to apply for a Wisconsin state ID and driver's license, and invited the Mexican consulate in Chicago to visit with a mobile unit that issues 'matricula' cards".

{{cite news

| title = Banks Open Doors To Illegal Immigrants

| last = Jordan

| first = Miriam

| publisher = Wall Street Journal

| date = 11 July 2005

| url = http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/mortgages/20050711-jordan.html

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080216024326/http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/mortgages/20050711-jordan.html

| archive-date = 16 February 2008

}} In Chicago, the Consul General of Mexico, Carlos Sada, estimated that up to 25% of applicants of the Matrícula Consular ID apply in order use it to acquire U.S. bank accounts.

{{cite web

| title = Statement of Sheila Bair Dean's Professor of Financial Regulatory Policy University of Massachusetts Amherst Before the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Hearings on Matricula Consular

| publisher = Asociacion de Supervisores Bancarios de las Americas (ASBA)

| url = http://www.asbaweb.org/E-News/enews-7/PDF_enews/0607_RR_10_EN.pdf

| date = 26 March 2003

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070812165304/http://www.asbaweb.org/E-News/enews-7/PDF_enews/0607_RR_10_EN.pdf

| archive-date = 12 August 2007}}

=Federal benefits for unbanked=

A U.S. federal law signed in 1996 contained a provision that required the federal government to make electronic payments by 1999. As a part of implementation of the provision, in 2008 the U.S. Treasury Department paired with Comerica Bank to offer the Direct Express Debit MasterCard prepaid debit card. The card is used to make payments to federal benefit recipients who do not have a bank account.[http://bankcreditnews.com/news/federal-government-chooses-direct-deposit-and-prepaid-cards-over-mailing-checks/9413/ "Federal government chooses direct deposit and prepaid cards over mailing checks"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130423044908/http://bankcreditnews.com/news/federal-government-chooses-direct-deposit-and-prepaid-cards-over-mailing-checks/9413/ |date=23 April 2013 }}, BankCreditNews, 15 April 2013, Accessed 22 April 2013

= Unbanked people per state =

class="wikitable sortable"

|+ Percent of residents who are unbanked, in 2019, by US state{{Cite web|title=Household Survey|url=https://household-survey.fdic.gov/survey-map?year=2019|access-date=15 November 2023|website=household-survey.fdic.gov}}

StatePercent
Alabama7.6
Alaska3.4
Arizona4.0
Arkansas7.1
California5.6
Colorado3.3
Connecticut8.4
Delaware2.8
Florida3.8
Georgia7.4
Hawaii3.0
Idaho4.0
Illinois6.6
Indiana4.5
Iowa2.6
Kansas5.5
Kentucky6.5
Louisiana11.4
Maine2.3
Maryland3.8
Massachusetts3.7
Michigan5.7
Minnesota2.8
Mississippi12.8
Missouri6.2
Montana4.0
Nebraska6.5
Nevada6.3
New Hampshire0.5
New Jersey4.0
New Mexico8.7
New York5.6
North Carolina3.4
North Dakota4.9
Ohio4.6
Oklahoma8.8
Oregon3.8
Pennsylvania4.0
Rhode Island4.4
South Carolina5.2
South Dakota4.9
Tennessee8.1
Texas7.7
Utah0.8
Vermont0.7
Virginia4.4
Washington4.6
West Virginia4.7
Wisconsin2.9
Wyoming3.6
United States overall5.4

The unbanked population internationally

As of 2017, approximately 1.7 billion people remain unbanked in emerging economies.{{Where|date=January 2022}}{{Vague|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}} This number has decreased from 2.5 billion people in 2014. unBanked.com, [https://unbanked.com/resources/banking/driving-financial-inclusion-for-the-unbanked/ Driving Financial Inclusion for the Unbanked], March 2021

See also

References

{{reflist}}