Uniformization (set theory)

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, the axiom of uniformization is a weak form of the axiom of choice. It states that if $R$ is a subset of $X\backslash times\; Y$, where $X$ and $Y$ are Polish spaces, then there is a subset $f$ of $R$ that is a partial function from $X$ to $Y$, and whose domain (the set of all $x$ such that $f(x)$ exists) equals

: $\backslash \{x\; \backslash in\; X\; \backslash mid\; \backslash exists\; y\; \backslash in\; Y:\; (x,y)\; \backslash in\; R\backslash \}\backslash ,$

Such a function is called a uniformizing function for $R$, or a uniformization of $R$.

Image:Uniformization ill.png

To see the relationship with the axiom of choice, observe that $R$ can be thought of as associating, to each element of $X$, a subset of $Y$. A uniformization of $R$ then picks exactly one element from each such subset, whenever the subset is non-empty. Thus, allowing arbitrary sets X and Y (rather than just Polish spaces) would make the axiom of uniformization equivalent to the axiom of choice.

A pointclass $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash Gamma\}$ is said to have the uniformization property if every relation $R$ in $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash Gamma\}$ can be uniformized by a partial function in $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash Gamma\}$. The uniformization property is implied by the scale property, at least for adequate pointclasses of a certain form.

It follows from ZFC alone that $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash Pi\}^1\_1$ and $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash Sigma\}^1\_2$ have the uniformization property. It follows from the existence of sufficient large cardinals that

• $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash Pi\}^1\_\{2n+1\}$ and $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash Sigma\}^1\_\{2n+2\}$ have the uniformization property for every natural number $n$.
• Therefore, the collection of projective sets has the uniformization property.
• Every relation in L(R) can be uniformized, but not necessarily by a function in L(R). In fact, L(R) does not have the uniformization property (equivalently, L(R) does not satisfy the axiom of uniformization).
• (Note: it's trivial that every relation in L(R) can be uniformized in V, assuming V satisfies the axiom of choice. The point is that every such relation can be uniformized in some transitive inner model of V in which the axiom of determinacy holds.)