Unit (ring theory)

{{Short description|In mathematics, element with a multiplicative inverse}}

{{Distinguish|Unit ring}}

In algebra, a unit or invertible element{{efn|In the case of rings, the use of "invertible element" is taken as self-evidently referring to multiplication, since all elements of a ring are invertible for addition.}} of a ring is an invertible element for the multiplication of the ring. That is, an element {{mvar|u}} of a ring {{mvar|R}} is a unit if there exists {{mvar|v}} in {{mvar|R}} such that

vu = uv = 1,

where {{math|1}} is the multiplicative identity; the element {{mvar|v}} is unique for this property and is called the multiplicative inverse of {{mvar|u}}.{{sfn|Dummit|Foote|2004|ps=}}{{sfn|Lang|2002|ps=}} The set of units of {{mvar|R}} forms a group {{math|R{{sup|×}}}} under multiplication, called the group of units or unit group of {{mvar|R}}.{{efn|The notation {{math|R{{sup|×}}}}, introduced by André Weil, is commonly used in number theory, where unit groups arise frequently.{{sfn|Weil|1974|ps=}} The symbol {{math|×}} is a reminder that the group operation is multiplication. Also, a superscript × is not frequently used in other contexts, whereas a superscript {{math|*}} often denotes dual.}} Other notations for the unit group are {{math|R}}, {{math|U(R)}}, and {{math|E(R)}} (from the German term {{lang|de|Einheit}}).

Less commonly, the term unit is sometimes used to refer to the element {{math|1}} of the ring, in expressions like ring with a unit or unit ring, and also unit matrix. Because of this ambiguity, {{math|1}} is more commonly called the "unity" or the "identity" of the ring, and the phrases "ring with unity" or a "ring with identity" may be used to emphasize that one is considering a ring instead of a rng.

Examples

{{anchor|−1}}The multiplicative identity {{math|1}} and its additive inverse {{math|−1}} are always units. More generally, any root of unity in a ring {{mvar|R}} is a unit: if {{math|1=rn = 1}}, then {{math|1=rn−1}} is a multiplicative inverse of {{mvar|r}}.

In a nonzero ring, the element 0 is not a unit, so {{math|R{{sup|×}}}} is not closed under addition.

A nonzero ring {{mvar|R}} in which every nonzero element is a unit (that is, {{math|1=R{{sup|×}} = R ∖ {{mset|0}}}}) is called a division ring (or a skew-field). A commutative division ring is called a field. For example, the unit group of the field of real numbers {{math|R}} is {{math|R ∖ {{mset|0}}}}.

= Integer ring =

In the ring of integers {{math|Z}}, the only units are {{math|1}} and {{math|−1}}.

In the ring {{math|Z/nZ}} of Modular arithmetic#Integers modulo m, the units are the congruence classes {{math|(mod n)}} represented by integers coprime to {{mvar|n}}. They constitute the multiplicative group of integers modulo n.

= Ring of integers of a number field =

In the ring {{math|Z[{{sqrt|3}}]}} obtained by adjoining the quadratic integer {{math|{{sqrt|3}}}} to {{math|Z}}, one has {{math|1= (2 + {{sqrt|3}})(2 − {{sqrt|3}}) = 1}}, so {{math|2 + {{sqrt|3}}}} is a unit, and so are its powers, so {{math|Z[{{sqrt|3}}]}} has infinitely many units.

More generally, for the ring of integers {{mvar|R}} in a number field {{mvar|F}}, Dirichlet's unit theorem states that {{math|R{{sup|×}}}} is isomorphic to the group

\mathbf Z^n \times \mu_R

where \mu_R is the (finite, cyclic) group of roots of unity in {{mvar|R}} and {{mvar|n}}, the rank of the unit group, is

n = r_1 + r_2 -1,

where r_1, r_2 are the number of real embeddings and the number of pairs of complex embeddings of {{mvar|F}}, respectively.

This recovers the {{math|Z[{{sqrt|3}}]}} example: The unit group of (the ring of integers of) a real quadratic field is infinite of rank 1, since r_1=2, r_2=0.

= Polynomials and power series =

For a commutative ring {{mvar|R}}, the units of the polynomial ring {{math|R[x]}} are the polynomials

p(x) = a_0 + a_1 x + \dots + a_n x^n

such that {{math|a0}} is a unit in {{mvar|R}} and the remaining coefficients a_1, \dots, a_n are nilpotent, i.e., satisfy a_i^N = 0 for some {{math|N}}.{{sfn|Watkins|2007|loc=Theorem 11.1|ps=}}

In particular, if {{mvar|R}} is a domain (or more generally reduced), then the units of {{math|R[x]}} are the units of {{mvar|R}}.

The units of the power series ring Rx are the power series

p(x)=\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i x^i

such that {{math|a0}} is a unit in {{mvar|R}}.{{sfn|Watkins|2007|loc=Theorem 12.1|ps=}}

= Matrix rings =

The unit group of the ring {{math|Mn(R)}} of square matrix over a ring {{mvar|R}} is the group {{math|GLn(R)}} of invertible matrices. For a commutative ring {{mvar|R}}, an element {{mvar|A}} of {{math|Mn(R)}} is invertible if and only if the determinant of {{mvar|A}} is invertible in {{mvar|R}}. In that case, {{math|A{{sup|−1}}}} can be given explicitly in terms of the adjugate matrix.

= In general =

For elements {{mvar|x}} and {{mvar|y}} in a ring {{mvar|R}}, if 1 - xy is invertible, then 1 - yx is invertible with inverse 1 + y(1-xy)^{-1}x;{{sfn|Jacobson|2009|loc=§2.2 Exercise 4|ps=}} this formula can be guessed, but not proved, by the following calculation in a ring of noncommutative power series:

(1-yx)^{-1} = \sum_{n \ge 0} (yx)^n = 1 + y \left(\sum_{n \ge 0} (xy)^n \right)x = 1 + y(1-xy)^{-1}x.

See Hua's identity for similar results.

Group of units

A commutative ring is a local ring if {{math|RR{{sup|×}}}} is a maximal ideal.

As it turns out, if {{math|RR{{sup|×}}}} is an ideal, then it is necessarily a maximal ideal and {{math|R}} is local since a maximal ideal is disjoint from {{math|R{{sup|×}}}}.

If {{mvar|R}} is a finite field, then {{math|R{{sup|×}}}} is a cyclic group of order {{math|{{abs|R}} − 1}}.

Every ring homomorphism {{math|f : RS}} induces a group homomorphism {{math|R{{sup|×}} → S{{sup|×}}}}, since {{mvar|f}} maps units to units. In fact, the formation of the unit group defines a functor from the category of rings to the category of groups. This functor has a left adjoint which is the integral group ring construction.{{sfn|Cohn|2003|loc=§2.2 Exercise 10|ps=}}

The group scheme \operatorname{GL}_1 is isomorphic to the multiplicative group scheme \mathbb{G}_m over any base, so for any commutative ring {{mvar|R}}, the groups \operatorname{GL}_1(R) and \mathbb{G}_m(R) are canonically isomorphic to {{math|U(R)}}. Note that the functor \mathbb{G}_m (that is, {{math|RU(R)}}) is representable in the sense: \mathbb{G}_m(R) \simeq \operatorname{Hom}(\mathbb{Z}[t, t^{-1}], R) for commutative rings {{mvar|R}} (this for instance follows from the aforementioned adjoint relation with the group ring construction). Explicitly this means that there is a natural bijection between the set of the ring homomorphisms \mathbb{Z}[t, t^{-1}] \to R and the set of unit elements of {{mvar|R}} (in contrast, \mathbb{Z}[t] represents the additive group \mathbb{G}_a, the forgetful functor from the category of commutative rings to the category of abelian groups).

Associatedness

Suppose that {{mvar|R}} is commutative. Elements {{mvar|r}} and {{mvar|s}} of {{mvar|R}} are called {{visible anchor|associate}} if there exists a unit {{mvar|u}} in {{mvar|R}} such that {{math|1=r = us}}; then write {{math|r ~ s}}. In any ring, pairs of additive inverse elements{{efn|{{mvar|x}} and {{math|−x}} are not necessarily distinct. For example, in the ring of integers modulo 6, one has {{math|1=3 = −3}} even though {{math|1 ≠ −1}}.}} {{math|x}} and {{math|−x}} are associate, since any ring includes the unit {{math|−1}}. For example, 6 and −6 are associate in {{math|Z}}. In general, {{math|~}} is an equivalence relation on {{mvar|R}}.

Associatedness can also be described in terms of the action of {{math|R{{sup|×}}}} on {{mvar|R}} via multiplication: Two elements of {{mvar|R}} are associate if they are in the same {{math|R{{sup|×}}}}-orbit.

In an integral domain, the set of associates of a given nonzero element has the same cardinality as {{math|R{{sup|×}}}}.

The equivalence relation {{math|~}} can be viewed as any one of Green's semigroup relations specialized to the multiplicative semigroup of a commutative ring {{mvar|R}}.

See also

Notes

{{notelist}}

Citations

{{reflist|3}}

Sources

{{refbegin}}

  • {{cite book

| last=Cohn | first=Paul M. | author-link=Paul Cohn

| year=2003

| title=Further algebra and applications

| edition=Revised ed. of Algebra, 2nd

| location=London | publisher=Springer-Verlag

| isbn=1-85233-667-6

| zbl=1006.00001

}}

  • {{cite book

| last1 = Dummit | first1 = David S.

| last2 = Foote | first2 = Richard M.

| year = 2004

| title = Abstract Algebra

| edition = 3rd

| publisher = John Wiley & Sons

| isbn = 0-471-43334-9

}}

  • {{cite book

| last = Jacobson | first = Nathan | author-link = Nathan Jacobson

| year = 2009

| title = Basic Algebra 1

| edition = 2nd

| publisher = Dover

| isbn = 978-0-486-47189-1

}}

  • {{cite book

| title = Algebra

| last = Lang | first = Serge | author-link = Serge Lang

| year = 2002

| series = Graduate Texts in Mathematics

| publisher = Springer

| isbn = 0-387-95385-X

}}

  • {{citation

| last = Watkins | first = John J.

| year = 2007

| title = Topics in commutative ring theory

| publisher = Princeton University Press

| isbn = 978-0-691-12748-4

| mr = 2330411

}}

  • {{cite book

| title = Basic number theory

| last = Weil | first = André | author-link = André Weil

| year = 1974

| series = Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften

| volume = 144

| edition = 3rd

| publisher = Springer-Verlag

| isbn = 978-3-540-58655-5

}}

{{refend}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Unit (Ring Theory)}}

Category:1 (number)

Category:Algebraic number theory

Category:Group theory

Category:Ring theory

Category:Algebraic properties of elements