Use of bayonets for crowd control

{{Short description|Law enforcement technique}}

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2017}}

The use of bayonets for crowd control involves the utilization or display of bayonets by security forces to stop, disperse, or intimidate crowds of people. Their use in modern times is mainly for their psychological effect in calming an aggressive crowd or in preventing a crowd advancing along a certain route.

Application

In addition to its use in warfare, the bayonet has a long history as a weapon employed in the control of unruly crowds.{{cite book|last1=Weir|first1=William|title=50 Weapons That Changed Warfare|date=2005|publisher=Career Press|isbn=1564147568|page=82|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oCuK9Jsxx1IC}} Prior to the advent of less-lethal weapons, police and military forces called upon for riot control were generally limited to firing live ammunition, or using bayonets or sabre charges.{{cite book|title=Police Operations, Theory and Practice: Emergency services, Emergency services|date=2016|isbn=978-1490275369}}

File:Massachusetts_Militia_vs_Strikers.jpg uses rifle-fixed bayonets in the "on guard" position to hold back strikers in Lawrence, Massachusetts in 1912.]]

In modern times, bayonets have generally been used for the psychological effect their display has in calming an aggressive crowd, or to corral mobs by making it impossible for them to advance down certain streets or avenues by blocking them with lines of police or soldiers holding rifle-fixed bayonets in the "on guard" (or, en garde) position. Nonetheless, the utility of the bayonet for crowd control has been questioned.{{cite book|last1=Grimshaw|first1=Allen|title=A Social History of Racial Violence|date=2009|publisher=Transaction Publishers|isbn=978-0202364025|page=511|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8uYZwTliL_oC}}

Historical use by country

=Burundi=

According to reports of eyewitnesses and Human Rights Watch, police in Burundi used bayonets to control crowds during the aftermath of the failed 2015 Burundian coup d'état attempt.{{cite news|last1=Buchanan|first1=Elsa|title=Burundi: Police tortured me with tear gas until I choked, says protester|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/burundi-police-tortured-me-tear-gas-until-i-choked-says-protester-1505034|access-date=December 29, 2016|work=International Business Times|date=June 9, 2015}}{{cite web|title=Burundi: Deadly Police Response to Protests|url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/05/29/burundi-deadly-police-response-protests|website=HRW.org|date=May 29, 2015|publisher=Human Rights Watch|access-date=December 29, 2016}}

File:Vietnam-War-US-Military-Bayonets (cropped).jpg

=China=

According to some accounts, soldiers of the 27th Group Army aggressively used bayonets against protesters during the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989.{{cite book|last1=Ogden|first1=Suzanne|title=China's Search for Democracy: The Student and the Mass Movement of 1989|date=1992|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|isbn=0873327233|page=433|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WH3XaqdQvF0C}}

=South Korea=

During the Gwangju Uprising of 1980, some physicians alleged treating people injured by bayonets used by the Republic of Korea Army.{{cite book|last1=Clifford|first1=Mark|title=Troubled Tiger: Businessmen, Bureaucrats, and Generals in South Korea|date=1998|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|isbn=0765601419|page=159|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aTja-kCF-b4C}}

=United Kingdom=

==India==

The British Indian Army made extensive use of the bayonet in crowd control operations in the British Raj.{{cite book|last1=Bell|first1=David|title=Riots in Literature|date=2009|publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing|isbn=978-1443811910|pages=83–84|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZCFJDAAAQBAJ}}

==Ireland==

In Ireland during the 19th century, the Irish police used the bayonet charge as a method of forcing crowds to scatter; in July 1881 one person was killed by a police bayonet in this manner.{{cite book|last1=Magennis|first1=E.|title=Crowds in Ireland, c.1720-1920|date=2000|publisher=Springer|isbn=0230288057|pages=233–245|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ySuDDAAAQBAJ}}

==Hong Kong==

The British Army continued its use of the bayonet as a crowd control weapon into the 20th century, using it during operations during the Hong Kong 1956 riots.{{cite news|title=British Battle Chinese Mobs in Hong Kong|url=https://www.newspapers.com/image/4190321/|access-date=December 29, 2016|work=Evening Independent|agency=Associated Press|date=October 11, 1956}}

=United States=

File:Safe Port Position Army.png

The New York Draft Riots of 1863 saw the use of bayonet charges by the U.S. Army against unruly mobs in New York City.{{cite book|last1=Cook|first1=Adrian|title=The Armies of the Streets: The New York City Draft Riots of 1863|date=2015|publisher=University Press of Kentucky|isbn=978-0813162553|page=102|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QNkeBgAAQBAJ}} During lumber protests in Tacoma, Washington in 1935, the Washington National Guard advanced on picketers with fixed bayonets, causing them to move away from the Federal Building where they had gathered.{{cite news|title=Bayonets and Tear Gas Used in Strike Riot|url=https://www.newspapers.com/image/97372461/|access-date=December 29, 2016|work=Medord Mail Tribune|agency=Associated Press|date=August 11, 1935}}

During 1968 revisions to the United States Army Field Manuals there was a move by the United States Secretary of the Army to eliminate the description of the bayonet as a crowd control weapon; however, senior Army leadership resisted the change. A study conducted that year by the Human Resources Research Organization concluded that the bayonet "is highly valuable as a riot control weapon" with a survey of personnel involved in military peacekeeping operations reporting its most valuable attribute was its psychological effect on a crowd.{{cite web|title=Retention of the Bayonet|url=https://mcoepublic.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/library/DonovanPapers/Papers%201900%20Forward/STUP6/S-Z/SommersLawrenceE%20%20CPT.pdf|website=Fort Benning|publisher=U.S. Army|access-date=January 26, 2022}} A compromise was ultimately reached whereby use of the bayonet was permitted in cases of violent mobs but not in routine civil operations.{{cite book|last1=Scheips|first1=Paul|page=414|title=The Role of Federal Military Forces in Domestic Disorders, 1945-1992|date=2005|publisher=Government Printing Office|isbn=0160723612|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gSV2NbOjbOkC&dq=bayonets+secretariat+staff+violent+civil&pg=PA414}} Two years later, in the protests that led to the Kent State shootings of 1970, two persons were injured after being bayoneted by soldiers of the Ohio National Guard.{{cite book|last1=Hensley|first1=Thomas|title=Kent State and May 4th: A Social Science Perspective|date=2010|publisher=Kent State University|page=18}}{{cite news|last1=Mangels|first1=John|title=Police crowd-control tactics have changed dramatically since Kent State protests|url=http://blog.cleveland.com/pdextra/2010/05/police_crowd-control_tactics_h.html|access-date=December 29, 2016|work=Cleveland Plain Dealer|date=May 2, 2010}}

The 2004 edition of the U.S. Army's Field Manual 19-15: Civil Disturbances calls for troops operating in crowd control situations against violent mobs to form into multiple lines with the first line armed with batons, and the second line armed with rifle-fixed bayonets held in the "safe-port position". According to the manual, "in this elevated position, bayonets can be seen by participants in the rear of the crowd. The sight of bayonets can create an impression of strength and numerical superiority".{{cite book|title=Field Manual 19-15|date=2004|publisher=U.S. Army}}

See also

References