User:AndyZ/PRnotes
The following suggestions are all semi-automatically generated by JavaScript, and there is no guarantee that they are all accurate; in most cases, however, they are correct for the article in question. The suggestions above include stylistic problems (many having to do with WP:MOS and its subpages, others can be found here) and other commonly found on WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FARC. However, it is strongly suggested that besides just tackling the problems listed here, that you ask for human assistance to review your article with a greater depth.
You can use the script yourself. Add
to your monobook.js, and then bypass your cache. While in editing mode, click on the peer review link that appears next to your logout button.This suggestion will always appear if the lead is only one paragraph long.If the lead is 5 paragraphs or longer, this suggestion will appear. It does not actually look at the content of the lead.Many articles will not have applicable infoboxes. If an article already has an infobox/similar template, the javascript code probably did not recognize the infobox; please just strike the comment.This will trigger if dates located in references or inline citations are not linkedPartial dates like months and days of the week usually aren't linked; years alone are sometimes linked – see WP:CONTEXT. User:Bobblewik has an useful JavaScript code to deal with this - add
to your monobook.jsIn many occasions, these terms are used as relative time terms and have absolutely nothing to do with the recent time concern.Certain phrases, especially “# in ”, will trigger this suggestion; in that case, the in is interpreted as “inches”.This will occasionally be triggered incorrectly due to certain phrases. The categories and interwiki/language links usually are located at the bottom of the article. They are in the format
to your monobook.js (or other file). See here.