User:Anthonyhcole/sandbox
Once finished, the table below will be presented to Wikipedia's editors on the Parkinson's disease talk page, so they may incorporate the proposed changes in the article. Some of my (AHC's) comments in the right hand column are aimed at the Wikipedia editors, explaining/arguing for the proposed changes.
Please don't edit the left hand column: I'll add proposed changes.
To join the discussion, create an account [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=User:Anthonyhcole/sandbox&type=signup here]. It takes one minute. Use your name followed by "(BMJ reviewer)" like this: Joe Bloggs (BMJ reviewer). Then
- click the "edit" (not "edit source") tab at the top of the page (between "read" and "view history")
- single-left-click the cell you want to comment in (the cell will go blue)
- double-left-click the cell.
(If you're using Firefox 43 or 44, do 1 and 2 but then hit "return" or "enter" instead of double-clicking.)
Please leave a space between your comment and the preceding one, and initial your comments.
I have only included paragraphs that reviewers have commented on or proposed changes to.
I'm still looking for sources to support proposed changes, and will add them as I find them.
;Reviewing offline
If you'd like to do this on an aeroplane (or anywhere else offline), I'll keep [https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C1FF29217E209194!2141&authkey=!AFGj7fd2K4v7N5o&ithint=file%2cdocx this Word version] of this page up to date. Download it before you fly, and email it to me when you're done. I'll add your comments to the conversation here. For a pdf of the full current version of the article (without any of our changes) [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=rendering&return_to=Parkinson%27s+disease&collection_id=4d8e63668d2159b78f8ca65a9c09badc6ff6eb51&writer=rdf2latex&is_cached=1 click here] --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 10:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
=Reviewers=
- David Burn ()
- Mark (MK)
- Anthony Lang (AEL)
- Andrew Lees ()
- Mark Stacy (MS)
=Wikipedia facilitators=
- Anthony Cole (AHC)
- Stuart Ray User:soupvector (SR)
Introduction
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
|Paragraph 1 | I think “paralysis agitans” should return to this location. The term cannot fade easily, because it remains a billing code for PD in the American billing lexicon.
MS. I dont agree that paralysis agitans should be replaced. It was always a poor term- there is no paralysis -I would prefer shaking palsy. AJL An editor has moved the alternative names from the introduction to the "infobox" (the list of links and facts in the top right corner) [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parkinson%27s_disease&diff=prev&oldid=710300350] so is this issue resolved? AHC ---- Reviewers: we try to make the language as simple as possible while avoiding ambiguity or loss of nuance - especially in the first, summary, paragraphs. "A progressive reduction in the speed and amplitude of voluntary movement...": Can anyone think of a more accessible form of words than "amplitude"? "In elderly patients there is an increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia." An alternative to "cognitive impairment"? AHC Perhaps we could use term range of movement instead of amplitude. MK That sounds good to me, Mark. I have replaced "amplitude" with "range" in the left hand column. If anyone objects, please speak up here. AHC ---- Reviewers: Regarding "Parkinson's disease is more common in older people, with most cases occurring after the age of The article presently cites [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=15172778 Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR (2004). "Parkinson's disease". Lancet 363 (9423)] which says, "The mean age of onset is around 60 years, although 5–10% of cases, classified as young onset PD, begin between the ages of 20 and 50."
I notice [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1223/#parkinson-overview.Definition Farlow J, Pankratz ND, Wojcieszek J, Foroud T (2004/2014) "Parkinson Disease Overview" GeneReviews] also states, "...onset around age 60 years; however, onset can be earlier. Generally, onset before age 20 years is considered to be juvenile-onset Parkinson disease, before age 50 years is considered to be early-onset Parkinson disease, and after age 50 years is considered late-onset Parkinson disease." Can you point to a recent authoritative source that supports the proposed change? Per Wikipedia's guideline on sources for medical information, ideal sources include literature reviews and systematic reviews published in relevant, reputable journals, recognised standard textbooks by experts in the field, and medical guidelines and position statements from national or international expert bodies. AHC The statements in the literature can be confusing, but they do support this statement. For example, the relevant chapter in the 2015 edition of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine states, "The mean age of onset is about 60 years. The frequency of PD increases with aging, but cases can be seen in patients in their 20s and even younger."{{cite book|author1=C. Warren Olanow|author2=Anthony H.V. Schapira|author3=Jose A. Obeso|editor1-last=Kasper|editor1-first=Dennis|editor2-last=Fauci|editor2-first=Anthony|editor3-last=Hauser|editor3-first=Stephen|editor4-last=Longo|editor4-first=Dan|editor5-last=Jameson|editor5-first=J. Larry|editor6-last=Loscalzo|editor6-first=Joseph|title=Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine|publisher=McGraw-Hill|isbn=9780071802154|edition=19|accessdate=23 May 2016|chapter=449: Parkinson's Disease and Other Movement DIsorders}} In a recent review, Goetz and Pal state, "The onset of Parkinson’s disease is rare before the age of 50 years, and a sharp increase in incidence is seen after age 60."{{cite journal|last1=Goetz|first1=CG|last2=Pal|first2=G|title=Initial management of Parkinson's disease.|journal=BMJ (Clinical research ed.)|date=19 December 2014|volume=349|pages=g6258|pmid=25527341|url=http://www.bmj.com.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/content/349/bmj.g6258|accessdate=23 May 2016}} and they cite De Lau and Breteler.{{cite journal|last1=de Lau|first1=LM|last2=Breteler|first2=MM|title=Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease.|journal=The Lancet. Neurology|date=June 2006|volume=5|issue=6|pages=525-35|doi=doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9|pmid=16713924|accessdate=23 May 2016}} The latter is from 2006, but it's directly cited in the 2014 review and it shows that the preponderance of people with PD are over 60. Regarding "young onset PD", a 2010 systematic review by van Rooden et al noted the lack of standardization of this term, i.e. "{{tq|Additionally, four studies included in the present review allowed insight in the extent to which each variable contributed to the classification of the subtypes.20, 21, 23, 25 Second, in the studies reported in the review by Foltynie et al.2 young age-at-onset, for example, was defined as <40 years, while the mean age-at-onset of the young onset subtypes that were found in the studies included in the present review ranged from 50 to 60 years and already showed clear differences with profiles with an old age-at-onset. Thus, researcher-based cut-off criteria may differ from mean values of clusters that are determined by CA and this may have consequences for the subtypes.}}".{{cite journal|last1=van Rooden|first1=SM|last2=Heiser|first2=WJ|last3=Kok|first3=JN|last4=Verbaan|first4=D|last5=van Hilten|first5=JJ|last6=Marinus|first6=J|title=The identification of Parkinson's disease subtypes using cluster analysis: a systematic review.|journal=Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society|date=15 June 2010|volume=25|issue=8|pages=969-78|pmid=20535823}} I will keep trying, but I don't see a MEDRS for the cutoff at age 45. SR I still don't see such a cutoff in MEDRS. SR |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | "Depending on age of onset, probably fewer than 5% of cases have a clear genetic origin..." MK Reviewers: Is there a source for this percentage? I've found several sources that talk in this ball-park, but they vary a bit.
say, "Monogenic forms, caused by a single mutation in a dominantly or recessively inherited gene, are well-established, albeit relatively rare types of PD. They collectively account for about 30% of the familial and 3%-5% of the sporadic cases."
claim "Approximately 5–10% of PD patients have monogenic forms of the disease, exhibiting a classical Mendelian type of inheritance, however, the majority PD cases are sporadic, probably caused by a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors." They cite [http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/R1/R48.long Lesage and Brice, 2009] for the figure.
say, "...PD with Mendelian inheritance, which represent no more than 10% of the cases..." AHC ---- Editors: Regarding "...the The two sources cited in the body of the article do not support the claim for pesticides. The second source,
does not address this risk factor's relative strength against other risk factors. The first source,
says, "the strongest associations with later diagnosis of PD were found for having a first-degree or any relative with PD or any relative with tremor; constipation; or lack of smoking history, each at least doubling the risk of PD." Reviewers: Should we mention constipation and family? AHC
This is a good paper to include and I think it would be worth mentioning constipation as a risk factor. It is a much more robust risk than pesticides. AJL Not family, too? Can someone please propose a change to the current clause, "...the strongest evidence is for a reduced risk in tobacco smokers..." AHC How about: "In addition to genetic/family association, constipation and being a non-smoker each have been associated with increased risk of developing PD later in life (e.g., individuals predisposed to PD may be less prone to smoking addiction)." This adheres to the cited reference, and seems more readable. SR |
style="vertical-align: top;"
|Paragraph 3 | Editors: " Every non-commonplace claim in the introduction should be repeated in the body of the article, and the claim in the body should be supported by a reliable source. This claim appears in the "Palliative care" subsection but the cited source does not support it. AHC ---- Editors: "... "Last resort" is not used in any of the supporting sources. ---- "Research directions include investigations into new animal models of the disease and of the potential usefulness of gene therapy, stem cell transplants and neuroprotective agents.": Perhaps this is not so informative here, it is also quite incomplete. MK. The introductory paragraphs are meant to summarise the most important points of the article, and are covered more fully in the body of the article. I have no opinion on the relevance of "research directions" in the introduction. This is possibly something we could leave up to the wider editing community to decide. AHC ---- choreatiform is incorrect this should be choreiform or choreic. AJL Each of these variants seems to be in use:
but the latter two are most widely in use. Reviewers: How about we say: "...most patients also experience the complication of choreiform dyskinesia (brief, irregular muscle contractions that are not repetitive or rhythmic, but appear to flow from one muscle to the next)" citing [http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/chorea/chorea.htm this NINDS definition]? AHC ---- The following sentence should read : Changes in diet can improve the response to l-dopa treatment and physical therapies can improve gait, balance and posture. AJL I've added it as a proposed change to the left hand column. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
|Paragraph 4 |
Classification section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | Editors: This is supported by [http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph/147/diagnosis/criteria.html UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria]:
Step 1. Diagnosis of Parkinsonian Syndrome Muscular rigidity 4-6 Hz rest tremor postural instability not caused by primary visual, vestibular, cerebellar, or proprioceptive dysfunction AHC These criteria are now known as the Queen Square Brain Bank Criteria for Parkinson's disease AJL |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | Reviewers: regarding, "There are also cases of parkinsonism where the cause has been identified, including gene mutations."
Could this be incorporated in the earlier addition beginning "These identifiable causes may include..."? I'll do that soon, if there are no objections. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3 | I dont think the sentence "The most typical symptom of Alzheimer's disease is dementia" is appropriate. It could be removed or else insert "In contrast to Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease presents most commonly with memory loss, and the cardinal signs of Parkinson's disease (slowness, stiffness and tremor) do not occur." AJL I've replaced the text in the left column. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
|Paragraph 4 |
Signs and symptoms section
class="wikitable" |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions ! style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 The most recognizable symptoms in Parkinson's disease | Reviewers: regarding, "The most recognizable symptoms in Parkinson's disease affect the initiation and fluency of movements giving rise to motor symptoms" Might this be clearer: "The most recognizable symptoms in Parkinson's disease AHC Yes much better AJL OK. I've changed that. Do we really need "giving rise to motor symptoms"? Aren't "impaired initiation and fluency" the motor symptoms? AHC Last sentence here should read. Some of these non-motor symptoms may be present at the time of diagnosis. AJL OK. I've incorporated that proposed change in the left-hand column. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2
| |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3
| I would say here 'A coarse slow tremor of the fingers at rest is the commonest presenting symptom which disappears during voluntary movement of the affected limb and in the deeper stages of sleep' to replace lines 1-5 AJL Done. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 4
| Hypokinesia means reduction in movement not slowness. Bradykinesia is the term most often used to apply to the disabling deficit seen in Parkinson's. AEL. Reviewers: Can anyone think of a source that supports the remaining changes? AHC Lees, A.J, Hardy, J, Revesz T Parkinsons disease. Lancet 2009;373; 2055-2066 AJL Thank you! AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 5 Rigidity is stiffness and resistance to limb movement caused by increased muscle tone, an excessive and continuous contraction of muscles. In parkinsonism the rigidity can be uniform (lead-pipe rigidity) or ratchety (cogwheel rigidity). The combination of tremor and increased tone is considered to be at the origin of cogwheel rigidity. Rigidity may be associated with joint pain; such pain being a frequent initial manifestation of the disease. In early stages of | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 6 Postural instability is typical in | Editors: Regarding "loss of confidence and reduced mobility" This is supported by:
AHC Editors: regarding "Instability is often absent in the initial stages, especially in younger people, especially prior to the development of bilateral symptoms." This is supported by
|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 7 Other recognized motor signs and symptoms include gait and posture disturbances such as festination (rapid shuffling steps and a forward-flexed posture when walking | Reviewers: "...are other common signs" is redundant. I'll remove it if no one objects. AHC Editors: This proposed change is supported by
AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 8 Parkinson's disease can cause neuropsychiatric disturbances which can range from mild to severe. This includes disorders of | Usually ("speech") refers to language and language disorders are not seen in Parkinson's. Hypophonia (reduction in speech volume) is a problem and mentioned later and is not a Neuropsychiatric problem so it doesn’t belong in this section. AEL. |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 9 A person with PD has two to six times the risk of dementia compared to the general population. The prevalence of dementia increases with age and to a lesser degree duration of the disease. Dementia is associated with a reduced quality of life in people with PD and their caregivers, increased mortality, and a higher probability of needing nursing home care. | Reviewers: "The prevalence of dementia increases with age and to a lesser degree duration of the disease.": Can anyone think of a reliable source that supports this? AHC Perhaps PMID [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19733364 19733364] or PMID [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20522088 20522088], though they are a bit dated? LeadSongDog come howl! 21:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Actually, PMID [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502301 27502301] ("Parkinson Disease and Dementia") was published in 2016 after your comment, User:LeadSongDog, and supports this claim. Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 08:12, 3 July 2017 (UTC) |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 10 Behavior and mood alterations are more common in PD without cognitive impairment than in the general population, and are usually present in PD with dementia. The most frequent mood difficulties are depression, apathy, anhedonia and anxiety. Establishing the diagnosis of depression is complicated by | "...hallucinations or delusions—occur in This figure (4%) is definitely incorrect. It is much higher than this. For this section I suggest citing:
AEL. Tony, does that source support all of the proposed changes in this paragraph? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 11 Sleep problems are a feature of the disease and can be worsened by medications. Symptoms can manifest as daytime drowsiness, (including sudden sleep attacks resembling narcolepsy), disturbances in REM sleep, or insomnia. REM behavior disorder (RBD), in which patients act out dreams, sometimes injuring themselves or their bed partner, may begin many years before the development of motor or cognitive features of PD or DLB. | Reviewers: Can anyone suggest a good source for these changes? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 12 Alterations in the autonomic nervous system can lead to orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure upon standing), oily skin and excessive sweating, urinary incontinence and altered sexual function. Constipation and gastric dysmotility can be severe enough to cause discomfort and even endanger health. | Reviewers: A brief explanation of this proposed change? AHC |
Causes section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | A source supporting this?
AHC The Noyce review referenced earlier covers this. AJL Thank you.
AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3 | Remove this gene (ATP13A2). It is not associated with typical Parkinson's disease phenotype.
SNCA, LRRK2, VPS35, EIF4G1, DNAJC13, and CHCHD2 are the dominant genes associated with this while parkin, PINK1 and DJ-1 are the recessively inherited genes that need to be mentioned here. We have reviewed all of this in a recent major review paper that you could cite here and elsewhere (for example the sections on Brain cell death, Diagnosis, Prevention):
AEL. ATP13A2 is not a typical Parkinson’s disease gene, it is mainly associated with rapid onset dystonia and parkinsonism. Should be removed here. MK. Agree this should be removed. AJL Done. Reviewers: We don't yet mention VPS35, EIF4G1, DNAJC13, and CHCHD2. Would someone like to propose language to incorporate them? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 4 | * Marder K, Wang Y, Alcalay RN, Mejia-Santana H, Tang MX, Lee A, Raymond D, Mirelman A2 Saunders-Pullman R, Clark L, Ozelius L, Orr-Urtreger A, Giladi N, Bressman S; LRRK2 Ashkenazi Jewish Consortium. Age-specific penetrance of LRRK2 G2019S in the Michael J. Fox Ashkenazi Jewish LRRK2 Consortium. Neurology. 2015 Jul 7;85(1):89-95. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001708. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
AEL. I'm not seeing the relevance of this detail for a broad overview article. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 4 | "...affecting up to 70% of the cells by the time death occurs.":
This should probably be revised – its typically stated that there is greater than 50% cell loss at the time of clinical presentation. Usually the cell loss at death would be considerably higher than 70%. AEL. Reviewers: A source for greater than 50% at presentation and higher than 70% at death? AHC ----"The Reviewers: Can we find a more accessible term than "lesion"? AHC ----Reviewers: "...the ventral (front) part ..." I thought "ventral" meant underside in the brain? AHC ----Reviewers: Are we talking about 70% of the substantia nigra or of the ventral pars compacta? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 5 | "Neuronal loss is accompanied by death of astrocytes...":
Generally there is overgrowth of astrocytes (“astrocytosis”); what is the evidence that there is death of astrocytes? To my knowledge this is never highlighted as a pathological feature and should probably be deleted. AEL. Editors: On page 273, the cited source,
says "Neuronal loss in the substantia nigra is accompanied by astrocytosis and microglial activation." So the editor who added this appears to have misunderstood the source. In the left hand column, I've proposed deletion of the entire sentence beginning "Neuronal loss is accompanied..." AHC |
Pathology section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | Reviewers: A source or sources for these additions?
AHC |
Diagnosis section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
|Illustration caption | MAJOR revision required: This figure should be replaced with a scan of the pre-synaptic dopamine system (eg DAT scan of F-dopa scan. FDG scans are not routinely done in PD and without very complex analysis that is done by only one group of researchers are NEVER useful in diagnosing PD.
AEL. Reviewers: Do any of you know where we can get such an image? The copyright owner would have to be willing to relinquish most rights, but they'd be credited on the image's file in [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page our media repository], and reusers would have to credit them. AHC |
Paragraph 1 A physician will diagnose | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3 | "The most widely known criteria come from the UK Andrew, can you please briefly explain these changes? AHC The criteria were developed by Bill Gibb and me at the Queen Square Brain Bank in the eighties and they have been very widely used by researchers. The attachment of PD Society to the name was related to funding at the time they were devised but in the last 10 years the criteria have been referred to as UK Brain Bank or better Queen Square Brain Bank. It will important to have the reference in too to balance the Postuma one below and is Gibb, W.R.G and Lees, A.J. The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of Parkinsons disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 1988;51;745-752 ---- "Very recently, a task force of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) has proposed diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease as well as research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal disease, but these will require validation against the more established criteria.":
AEL. |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 4 |
Prevention section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | "However, recently it has been suggested that the negative association with smoking is not protective but is due to an inherent difference in the propensity of patients destined to develop PD to become addicted to nicotine.":
AEL. Reviewers: This is a primary source. Has anyone, independent of the authors, reviewed their results and supported this suggestion? Belay that. Found:
|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | "...certain calcium channel blocking drugs () and higher levels of uric acid.":
You could cite the Kalia and Lang Lancet paper here as a review that covers this material. AEL.
AHC |
Management section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | Editors: "...medications, surgery and The cited source ([https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg35/evidence/full-guideline-194930029 NICE 2006 guidelines, page 141]) supports this change. AHC ---- "L-DOPA ( Reviewers: We'll need a source for this. AHC ---- Reviewers: " I'm seeing a fair amount of variety in the number and nature of stages authors describe. Can we use "Three stages may be distinguished"? AHC ---- "However, levodopa remains the most effective treatment for PD and should not be delayed in patients whose quality of life is impaired. Indeed, dyskinesias correlate more strongly with duration and severity of the disease than duration of levodopa treatment, so delaying this therapy may not really provide much longer dyskinesia-free time than earlier use ()." We'll need a source for this. AHC
Thank you. We use secondary sources such as reviews, as opposed to primary sources like this trial report. The following 2006 review uses this trial report to make the point, so I'll cite it in the article.
AHC ---- "When medications are not enough to adequately control symptoms, surgery Aren't infusions medications? AHC Should read 'when oral medications' and then remove infusion and put subcutaneous waking day apomorphine infusion and enteral dopa pumps AJL Done. AHC Insert references for apomorphine the seminal paper is:
AJL Thank you. Wikipedia insists we cite secondary sources so I've cited the following review which cites the 1988 Lancet article and makes the point.:
|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | Reviewers: Can you suggest a source for this?
AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3 | " AEL. Editors: The cited source, reference 54,
doesn't mention dyskinesias or joint stiffness in relation to levodopa metabolised outside the brain. The editor who added that has misread the source. AHC ---- Reviewers: It would be nice to have a source attributing nausea, vomiting and orthostatic hypotension to peripheral metabolism of levodopa. AHC Got it:
AHC. ---- "There are controlled release versions of levodopa. Intravenous infusions of levodopa are not used clinically – they are only a research tool. AEL. ---- "A newer extended-release levodopa preparation does seem to be more effective in controlling motor fluctuations but in many patients problems persist."
AEL. Reviewers: We should cite someone who has reviewed this (Connolly & Lang, 2014?). We can cite the trial report, too, but we really should show it has been evaluated and contextualised by independent expert authors. AHC ---- "Intestinal infusions of levodopa (Duodopa) can result in striking improvements in motor fluctuations.":
AEL. Reviewers: Has this been discussed in an independent review? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 4 | Entacapone is generally believed to be less effective than tolcapone.
AEL. Editors: The following source,
confirms this. Quote: "Tolcapone is undoubtedly the most effective drug, although in clinical practice sporadic cases of hepatotoxicity have limited its use in patients unresponsive to entacapone. ... Entacapone is generally well tolerated, and no significant adverse events are reported." AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 5 | " This approach is being used much less now. There is no good evidence that there is important advantage in delaying levodopa except in young patients where dyskinesia can become problematic. Rather than citing reference numeral 54 repeatedly (somewhat outdated and in some cases clearly wrong) I would suggest citing a large review that we wrote for JAMA (evidence-based studies were emphasized in all of the sections of this paper):
AEL. |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 6 | Editors: A source supporting the inclusion of Rotigotine:
Quote: "In conclusion, the preclinical and clinical development of the rotigotine transdermal system has established this system as an effective method for providing continuous delivery of a dopamine agonist across the skin, and may have clinical advantages compared with other agents." AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 7 | "... AEL.
Editors: The source cited for this is [https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg35/evidence/full-guideline-194930029 page 63 of the NICE 2006 guideline]. It says: "However, agonists generate significant dopaminergic adverse events. The latter do not lead to drug withdrawal, which suggests that they are mild and that tolerance develops. These conclusions apply to the relatively young people included in these studies. Further work on the efficacy and safety of dopamine agonists in older people is required." So Wikipedia's assertion that side effects are usually mild misinterprets the source. AHC ---- "However, recent studies have emphasized little advantage to so-called "levodopa sparing" approaches (e.g., dopamine agonists, MAO-B inhibitors) in early disease":
AEL. Reviewers: Per our medical sources guideline, we prefer to cite secondary sources. I don't have access to the following. Does it support this change?
AHC ---- "...and discontinuing dopamine agonists may be associated with "dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome":
AEL. Reviewers: Where possible, we prefer to cite topic overviews, rather than individual studies. Would this source be adequate support for the claim?
AHC ---- "...with symptoms similar to withdrawal from narcotics, and apathy"
AEL. ---- " I missed this report! Believe this statement is not appropriate in this setting. MS.
Editors: The source cited for this is
It does not comment on the prevalence of dyskinesias due to dopamine agonists in younger people. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 9 | "...but AEL. Reviewers and editors: The source ([https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg35/evidence/full-guideline-194930029 the NICE guideline]) says on p. 71, "The trial evidence supports the ability of MAOB inhibitors in PD to improve motor symptoms, improve activities of daily living and delay the need for levodopa. ... This is at the expense of more dopaminergic adverse events and, as a result, more withdrawals from treatment". But it's a very old source. (It's being re-written now, for publication in 2017(?) I think.) Given the age of the source and the relatively thin evidence they based the claim on, the simple act of challenging the claim should be sufficient to see it removed. But if you know of a recent source that compares the adverse event profiles of levodopa and MAO-B inhibitors, it would be nice to have. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 10 | "...clozapine...": Much more effective than quetiapine and clearly proven in RTCs whereas quetiapine has not.
AEL. Tony, is this covered in a review? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 11 | "Studies in the past few decades have led to great improvements in surgical techniques, so that surgery is again being used in people with advanced PD for whom drug therapy
MK.
Ah. Sorry. I'm misreading. The old source doesn't say that surgery is used increasingly in patients with less advanced disease and I'm not seeing it in Sheupbach et al. either. Can you think of a review, position statement or guideline that supports that claim? AHC ---- "New developments in DBS include manufacturing closed loop systems in which deep brain electrodes simultaneously pick up local field potentials to respond with the appropriate electrical signal.":
MK. I realise it's sometimes just not possible, but is there any way we can say this so it's understandable by the intelligent lay reader? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 13 | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 14 | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 15 | A very good review paper on GI issues in PD has been recently published in Lancet Neurology by
|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 16 | " Food in the stomach and constipation both slow stomach emptying which delays or reduces L-DOPA access to the upper small intestine where it is absorbed, resulting in poorer responses to individual doses."
Reviewers: A source for this? Does Fasano et al. 2015 support this?
AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 17 | "...or orally ingested and intravenous glutathione..."
Would ask other authors to comment on whether this should be stated. MS. From Wikipedia's perspective, it's appropriate to mention prominent fringe treatments and the strength (or weakness) of the evidence supporting their use. AHC ---- You need a source for Mucuna bean use; Katzenschlager R Evans A Manson A et al Mucuna pruriens in Parkinsons disease a double blind clinical and pharmacological study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004 75 1672-1677 AJL |
Prognosis section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | "Motor symptoms, if not treated, advance Reviewers: The cited source for the original claim is
I'm awaiting access to that. Can anyone provide a source that supports a linear course? I've got that 2006 article now and it says: :"progression of motor impairment is likely non-linear in PD with steeper declines earlier vs. later in the disease. This was originally suggested by Fearnley and Lees (1991) who reported an exponential decline of neuronal cell counts in the SN of PD brains over time and is supported by clinical observations of faster rates of progression of UPDRS motor scores in the first vs. the 10th year of disease or plateaning of OFF-period motor scores with disease durations of 9 years and above as observed in cross-sectional studies. These observations highlight the need for early intervention when attempting to modify disease progression in PD" "Likely". So, at the very least, we should make the claim less categorical. Given the age of the source and the "likely", in the absence of a stronger, more recent source, I think simply challenging the claim should be enough to warrant its removal. To change the language to "in linear fashion" we'll need a good source supporting that. AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3 |
Epidemiology section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | Suggest citing this paper for this section:
AEL. |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | Reviewers: A few words explaining this deletion would be helpful.
AHC |
Proposed changes Deletions Insertions |
Discussion |
---|---|
Paragraph 1 Several early sources, including an Egyptian papyrus, an Ayurvedic medical treatise, the Bible, and Galen's and Leonardo da Vinci's writings, describe symptoms |
Paragraph 1 |
Paragraph 2 In 1817 an English doctor, James Parkinson, published his essay reporting six cases of paralysis agitans. An Essay on the Shaking Palsy described the characteristic resting tremor, abnormal posture and gait, paralysis and diminished muscle strength, and the way that the disease progresses over time. Early neurologists who made further additions to the knowledge of the disease include Trousseau, Gowers, Kinnier Wilson and Erb, and |
|
Paragraph 3 Anticholinergics and surgery (lesioning of the corticospinal pathway or some of the basal ganglia structures) were the only treatments until the arrival of levodopa, which reduced their use dramatically. Levodopa was first synthesized in 1911 by Casimir Funk, but it received little attention until the mid 20th century. It entered clinical practice in 1967 and brought about a revolution in the management of PD. |
Reviewers: A few words explaining the deletion?
AHC |
Society and culture section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | Need to add reference to weblink for Parkinson’s UK: www.parkinsons.org.uk.
DB. |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | Reviewers: The editors of the article have left this note embedded in the source code for anyone editing this section:
"Parkinson's is a common disease, so lots of notable people have it. Please only add people here who have played a MAJOR role in supporting research or public understanding of the disease. All others can be listed at the main article about people diagnosed with Parkinson's disease." Who should be included, and how, can probably be easily resolved in a conversation with the editors. AHC ---- "... sometimes acting without medication to illustrate the effects of the condition.": This needs to be checked carefully. As I understood it, he was criticized for doing that when in fact people misinterpreted his dyskinesia (due to his medication) for the primary symptoms of the disease and claimed that he had withheld his medication to get sympathy. This clearly indicated a lack of understanding on the part of the congressional members who criticized him. (At least that is my understanding what took place but perhaps I am wrong). AEL. ---- "The Michael J. Fox Foundation aims to develop a cure for Parkinson's disease.": I would add something about how much they have raised for research emphasizing that this has been an extremely effective organization. AEL. |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3 | "Whether he has PD or a parkinsonism related to boxing is unresolved.":
We cannot really resolve the dx of lewy body parkinsonism in anyone prior to autopsy. Does it help any reader to think about parkinsonism and boxing? Muhammad was certainly not demented when I ran the Ali Center, and that was 20 years after diagnosis. MS. ---- Do we include a link to Robin Williams? Others? DB. |
Research section
class="wikitable" | |
style="width:50%" | Proposed changes Deletions Insertions | style="width:50%" | Discussion |
---|---|
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 1 | Reviewers: A brief explanation?
AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 2 | |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 3 | "More recently, gene therapy for the trophic factor neurturin, injected into both the striatum and substantia nigra, failed to show benefit in a well-designed randomized controlled clinical trial":
AEL. ---- Tony, can you think of a source (if Warren Olanow doesn't) that supports the earlier addition beginning with "...proteins that could affect symptoms..."? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 4 | "...neuroprotection...":
Me – look up Kalia recent MDJ paper and edit. AEL. ---- "Several molecules have been proposed as potential treatments.": Suggest adding the following reference in which we reviewed this area in considerable detail very recently so it is the most up to date reference on the topic:
AEL. Presently we cite
AHC ---- "Both active and passive methods of immunizing against alpha-synuclein are being actively pursued." Reviewers: Is there a one or two sentence layman's explanation for "active and passive methods"? AHC |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Paragraph 5 | " Only one group has injected them into the substantia nigra; all other studies that use the striatum. AEL. ---- "Although there was initial evidence of mesencephalic dopamine-producing cell transplants being beneficial, double-blind trials to date indicate that cell transplants Reviewers: I don't understand "particularly in these trials". What trials? The article presently cites
AHC ---- "although individual patients (often younger and with milder disease) have shown marked prolonged improvement." Reviewers: Can we have a source that supports this? AHC ---- "It remains uncertain whether early 'physiological' replacement of the damaged nigrostriatal dopamine pathway will correct all the symptoms and signs of Parkinson’s disease.":
AEL. |
References
{{reflist}}