User:Bon courage#Cynic's Appendix

{{shortcut|WP:CATW}}

{{tinc}}

If {{u|MastCell}} has the Old Testament and {{u|Bishonen}} the New, then perhaps this is the Apocrypha?

{{bare anchored list

| Wikipedia is famously the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. This is not necessarily a good thing.

| For working on content in controversial areas, it is better to be beloved by admins, than to be an admin.

| If a new editor draws attention to their newness in their initial edits, they're not new.

| Any editor who argues their point by invoking donations to Wikipedia, has no viable point.

| Any editor who argues their point by invoking "editor retention", is not an editor Wikipedia wants to retain.

| A sure tell of a POV-pushing argument is when WP:PSTS is truncatedly quoted as "primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia ..."

| Certain words and phrases are strongly indicative of WP:PROFRINGE proclivities: allopathic (except in a historical context), healing arts, medical (or scientific) dogma, modality, pseudoskeptic, scientism, and Western medicine.

| AP2 rots your teeth.

| Any editor who uses the word "bias" as an adjective, will turn out not to understand WP:NPOV.

| Rejoice when your callow opponent posts to your mature, well-watched User Talk page: the bat signal is now aloft.

| Any editor who quotes Mahatma Gandhi's "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you ..." in support for their point, doesn't have a point that deserves to progress beyond the "laugh" stage.

}}

• Lede bombing (WP:LEDEBOMB)
• A POV that draws a source (WP:POVSOURCING)
• WP:BIGMISTAKE
• WP:CRYMEDRS

{{Userboxtop|align=left|toptext=}}

{{User Wikipedian for|year=2007|month=05|day=03|sc=y}}

{{User active edits|over 60,000}}

{{User:Anomie/Userbox committed identity|identity=373BABF745479E1FE32BC7E78E6230AB7CADC428AF1838BBD479B07EDA75018F8C7F9A5891073A1D331D302E57F0175E2662B09B5E69470FC4E9181281B2002C|SHA-512|}}

{{Userboxbottom}}