User:CanadaMaple123

.

__NOTOC__

Profile

{{Experienced Editor Userbox}}

{{User:Rambo's Revenge/Userboxes/WikiProject Awards}}

{{User WPBiography}}

{{Template:User WP Engineering}}

User boxes

{{Template:User WP Science}}

{{User:Szyslak/UBX/FAC too strict}}

{{User:Skotywa/GiveBarnstars}}

{{user KC}}

{{Template:User WP Human rights}}

{{Template:User was thanked}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Living people/Userbox}}

{{User Wikipediholic|790|972563240}}.

{{RC patroller topicon}}

About Me

I am a seeker of truth, knowledge, and peace. I am generally interested in living persons, awards, academy, societies, etc. I work on BLP and awards pages on wikipedia. My BLP notice board tool https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard and policy guide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines

Principles

Wikipedia is an open Encyclopedia. So it means anyone can edit. But, the prime purpose of editing is to create new articles or improve on existing articles. Improve the content, the sources, etc., and not vandalize or undertake personal attacks (WP:PA WP:HARASS).

New BLPs pages that I've created

My Notes

  • Editor vs. Admin: I am definitely more of an editor than administrator.

Notices

Editors are encouraged to exercise their cool and kindness when handling mischievous acts and tight situations. Below is a good reminder to all of us when we edit wikipedia. Note that mischievous acts can easily be spotted. That include personal attacks. Wikipedia pages are not places for people to vent their anger, conflicts, or displeasure against someone.

{{font color|blue|Be calm, civil, act in good faith}}

{{font color|blue|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid paper}}

{{tmbox|text=Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid paper (newspaper); The possibility of harm to living subjects is one of the important factors to be considered when using editorial decision. Source: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons}}

{{font color|blue|Quality vs. Quantity - Myths about Edit Counts}}

{{tmbox|text=Edit counts do not necessarily reflect the value of a user's contributions to the Wikipedia project. As the saying goes, "Quality, not quantity" — indeed, sometimes high edit counts are indicative of carelessness.Source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_count}}

{{font color|blue|BLP is not about self-promotion of your research projects, etc.}}

{{tmbox|text='''Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertisement of your research projects, society volunteering work, the conferences or journals you lead or run, etc.}}


.