User:Chrisdecorte
[http://be.linkedin.com/in/chrisdecorte/ Chris De Corte] is a freelance consultant living in [http://www.aalst.be/ Aalst] (Belgium) and is among others also a mathematical hobbyist.
Chris is interested in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_mathematics unsolved problems]
Chris found that the equality between the Riemann zèta function and the Euler product does not seem to hold (for s<=1). This is explained [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/disprove-of-equality-between-riemann-zeta-function-and-euler-product here].
Chris independently developed his own sieve: the "Sine Sieve" which has some resemblance with the Sieve of Eratosthenes and which is explained [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajmvOLrpEAY here].
Chris independently derived 2 new formulas to determine if a given number n is prime or not:
and:
Using these formulas, he can [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/derivation-of-a-prime-verification-formula-to-prove-the-related-open-problems prove] [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/new-prime-formula-to-prove-open-problems-ii twice] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach%27s_conjecture Goldbach's Conjecture] & [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_prime Twin prime Conjecture].
This is done by replacing n with 2n=p+q (p and q being 2 primes) and working out the sinus terms.
One of the 2 primes primes that compose the Goldbach requirement [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/finding-goldbach-q needs] to be a solution to the following equation:
Other Prime testing formula's he developed are (for those who can't see the beauty of the sine function):
and:
This last formula is true for primes but is also true for some non-primes as 4, 9, 15, ...
Chris also developed multiple [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime-counting_function prime counting formula]:
His probabilistic prime counting formula is his final one and can be represented as follows:
where can be very closely approximated as:
The origin of this formula can be found [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/probabilistic-approach-to-prime-counting here] and it will take a long time before someone will improve the accurateness of this formula. A video about this formula can be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Un1z3iJXVtA here].
His previous formula had also very good accuracy:
Others are:
This formula [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/better-prime-counting-formula seems] to be better than the pure version of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithmic_integral Logarithmic Integral] x/lnx up to approximately 1E+10 (except for a short range between 2 and 9000).
Therefore, he would like to propose the following improved formula:
Other works:
Chris found a very close [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/approximating-the-trisection-of-an-angle approximation] to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_trisection angle trisection problem]
He also found an [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/approximations-in-drawing-and-squaring-the-circle approximation] to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle squaring of the circle] and made some interesting but unanswered comments.
:Category:Unsolved problems in mathematics
:Category:Theorems about prime numbers
I calculated the [http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisDeCorte1/fractal-approximations-tosomefamousconstants approximation] of some famous constants as a fractal.