User:DASHBot/False Postive Reports

Constructive or not, the man pictured is Dan Savage, a famous gay sex advice columnist. You can find the same photo here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Savage.

I have also seen the same photo accompanying his column on the Onion AV club website, so I have doubts regarding the copyright status of the image.

NOT vandalism, but a constructive contribution. The use of sex worker or sex trade worker is a perfectly legitimate term Mgoodyear (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

NOT vandalism, but a constructive contribution. The use of sex worker or sex trade worker is a perfectly legitimate term Mgoodyear (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

that is a lie

I did not perform any revisions, so Yea don't know why I got a message

The image was quickly replaced with a file that was the correct format. No abuse or vandalism was intended 71.97.55.109 (talk) 16:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I did not change the page in question; I'm going to go ahead and change my password since it is possible someone has broken into my account. Thanks. Danny

I didn't clicked it mean to click into what i clicked into in other words i did not do it intentionally I was looking for where the down load button was

but obviously i misunderstood

sorry--75.210.4.90 (talk)

No idea what "Nickel Creek" even is. Never modified by me.

I have no idea who did this vandalism, but it most certainly was not me. Frankly, "www.poo.com" is so silly and juvenile sounding that it would never occur to me to do such a thing. I have never visited Penny Wong's entry until today; I also happen to be a general supporter of the Labour party, and I would thus have no motive to deface her entry.

If you follow the edits I have made to other entries in the past you'll find they are almost entirely spelling or grammar corrections. I once changed a few "A.D." and "B.C." references in one article to "C.E." and "B.C.E.", but I didn't know at the time that there was a policy against such changes (and vice versa), and I have respected that policy ever since.

Sincerely,

Robert L. Nansel, Jr.

I have written on only a single page, this was not any work of mine.

I pressed "talk" to submit a question. I never ever attempted to directly edit a Wiki article, but always posted a question or comment in the talk tab. Today, I got barfed on by Wiki with so many accusations that I vandalized articles with malicious edits, apparently all in the pop-culture area of interest, which is even more strange. Again, never have I edited an article, never vandalized and definitely never felt strong enough about pop topics to sabotage WiKi. Perhaps tracking IP addresses is not the best way to police Wikipedia?

What the hell have I received this for? There is no indication as to what this refers to.

Hi, Ahmed Benbella did not create FLN, please needs correction, thx

Nowt to do with me, you are wrong wikipedia so take that message and shove it!