User:Durova/Wikipedia is not an experiment in consensus reality
{{essay}}
{{userpage}}
Wikipedia is not an experiment in consensus reality. Wikipedia's editors do not create philosophical truth when they revise articles. Instead, appropriate collaboration summarizes verifiable information from reliable sources in a neutral manner. The experts may be wrong and may need to be corrected, but as a tertiary source it is not an encyclopedia's function to spearhead new ideas.
In other words, the population of elephants does not triple just because some Wikipedian tries to say so. The elephants don't read Wikipedia, and if any human endeavor could inspire them to triple their population it would probably be reruns of steamy episodes from the Discovery Channel.
See also
External links
- [http://media.www.the-telescope.com/media/storage/paper749/news/2007/10/01/News/Philosophy.Technology.Collide.During.Campus.Lectures-2997997.shtml The Telescope, 1 October 2007]
- [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/09/wiki_bots_foretell_snooker_result/ The Register, 9 May 2007]
- [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/02/wikipedia_fraud/ The Register, 2 March 2007]
- [http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,,1937496,00.html The Guardian, 4 November 2006]
- [http://cornellsun.com/node/19063 Cornell Daily Sun, 20 October 2006]