User:Jnestorius
Joesty Nestorius, at your service.
Also playing at :commons:User:Jnestorius
Dealing with controversy
Try to satisfy the following requirements, in descending order of importance:
;Do not say anything that is not true: This does not preclude initial simplifications and approximations clearly flagged as such and corrected later in an article.
;Do not omit anything important: This may be a temptation to forestall controversy, editwars, etc; but "don't mention the war" is bad advice for an encyclopedia.
;Distinguish between "Controversy about Foo" and "Foo": Do not allow the former to overwhelm the latter. Depending on the particular case, the controversy may better be either confined to its own section/subarticle or else interspersed through the article .
;Is there even a controversy?: There may be a difference of opinion with no engagement between advocates of each opinion. Or there may be polite debate. Or they may be vitriolic or violent conflict.
;Avoid annoying partisans: Avoid hot-button words and phrases likely to annoy partisans of one side of the controversy: Avoiding using a term does not mean avoiding mentioning it.
;Avoid annoying neutrals: Avoid long-winded circumlocutions, hedges, or terms of art; litanies of "on the one hand...on the other hand..."