User:Kf4yfd

{{Lowercase-user|kf4yfd}}

{{Userboxtop|}}

{{User wikipedia}}

{{User:Wordbuilder/UserBox/Wikipedia fake passport}}

About me

{{User Oregon}}

{{user:Mkdw/College}}

{{User:EVula/Userboxes/countries visited|14}}

{{user en-5}}

{{User:UBX/1337-5}}

{{user:UBX/flexitarian}}

Skills

{{user xhtml}}

{{user html}}

{{user xml}}

{{user css}}

{{user TeX}}

{{user wiki lang}}

{{Template:User bash-3}}

{{Template:User sql-2}}

{{user c-1}}

My Preferences

{{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Cold}}

{{User:Scepia/metric wish-1}}

Hobbies / Interests

{{user:UBX/amateur radio}}

{{user:UBX/hobby:Electronics}}

{{User:UBX/architecture}}

{{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User 2=1}}

{{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Astronomy}}

Misc

{{user screw}}

{{User:UBX/Overuse}}

{{Userboxbottom}}

About Me

Current Special-Interest Pages

Articles removed from stub status

Wikipedia Preferences

I prefer the SI system and believe that pages should also include the Imperial system equivalent in paranthesis follwing a number. Wikipedia is, afterall international (and the US seems reluctant to go metric).

I beleive that every wikipedia page should have a "List of Terms and Concepts" section or something similar for 3 reasons.

:1. Wikipedia is used by thousands of people of all ages every day. If I cannot understand the page, neither will say, a school age reader.

:2. Having to define every other word in an article is just rediculous, as is having to open a seperate page to define these words then decipher which meaning was intended.

:3. If a user is reading a wikipedia article chances are that they are trying to learn about the subject and do not alrady have an in-depth knowledge of it. Many articles seem to be written as if they were intended for someone already educated in their subject.

For an example see geocentric orbit.

My subpages