User:Kudpung/sandbox
{{info|Nothing to see here. This is just a random collection of notes for stuff I'm working on. Move along please.}}Bold textSpecial:PageInfo
Something like this flowchart?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Potential_U5s/1
Link checker https://link-dispenser.toolforge.org/
[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Open_letter_from_English_Wikipedia_New_Page_Reviewers NPP Open Letter]
=cite template syntax=
{{cite news
|last1 = Blogs
|first1 = Joe
|last2 =
|first2 =
|date = 2024
|title = My Title
|url = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kudpung/sandbox
|url-access = subscription
|trans-title =
|format =
|work = The Signpost
|language = French
|location = Berlin
|publisher = MediaWiki Ltd
|url-status =
|archive-url =
|archive-date =
|access-date = 6 July 2019
|via =
|quote =
}}
- registration: a free registration with the provider is required to access the source, even if a limited preview, abstract or review may still be available without registration
- limited: free access is subject to limited trial and a subscription is normally required
- subscription: the source is only accessible via a paid subscription with the provider of the source ("paywall")
Notability and sourcing essays in WP space
All high schools can be notable
Alternative outlets Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
Big events make key participants notable
Businesses with a single location
Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
Existence does not prove notability
Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
How the presumption of notability works
Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
Masking the lack of notability
News coverage does not decrease notability
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
No one cares about your garage band
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
Notability cannot be purchased
Notability is not a level playing field
Notability is not a matter of opinion
Notability is not relevance or reliability
Notability points Notability sub-pages
Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
One sentence does not an article make
Reducing consensus to an algorithm
Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
Sources must be out-of-universe
What is and is not routine coverage
Wikipedia article Two prongs of merit
Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
sourcing
drafts
March 10, 2025
curprev 15:10, March 10, 2025 Rarely I burden myself with thinking talk contribs 6 bytes −8,295 ←Replaced content with '
curprev 15:10, March 10, 2025 Rarely I burden myself with thinking talk contribs m 8,301 bytes 0 Rarely I burden myself with thinking moved page Draft:Philip S. Hess to Draft:Rarely I burden myself with thinking... undothank
March 4, 2025
curprev 20:51, March 4, 2025 David Gerard talk contribs 8,301 bytes +5 No edit summary undothank
curprev 20:50, March 4, 2025 David Gerard talk contribs m 8,296 bytes 0 David Gerard moved page Philip S. Hess to Draft:Philip S. Hess without leaving a redirect: back to draft while we work out what's going on here undothank
curprev 19:54, March 4, 2025 David Gerard talk contribs 8,296 bytes −664 rm deprecated and primary undothank
curprev 17:42, March 4, 2025 Rarely I burden myself with thinking talk contribs 8,960 bytes +8,960 major edit thank Tags: use of deprecated (unreliable) source Visual edit