User:Kudpung/sandbox#Recurring themes

{{info|Nothing to see here. This is just a random collection of notes for stuff I'm working on. Move along please.}}Bold textSpecial:PageInfo

Something like this flowchart?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Potential_U5s/1

Link checker https://link-dispenser.toolforge.org/

[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Open_letter_from_English_Wikipedia_New_Page_Reviewers NPP Open Letter]

=Britcom 21stC=

  • gang shows/ensemble cast, farce, class conflict
  • Tony Hancock's legacy has had a lasting effect on British comedy
  • allo allo overarching stories
  • Ingredients for a good sitcom: an ensemble piece, it has to be set in a workplace, being in a grim situation, cultural differences, the writing, and even the way it's filmed

Honey Bee (for Chan.5 Honey Bee Media Ltd 2023

{{cite AV media

| people = Bradley Walsh (Presenter)

| title = Bradley Walsh's Comedy Heroes

| medium = Television documentary

| publisher = Honey Bee Media Ltd (for Chan.5)

| location =

| date = 2023}}

{{cite AV media

| people = Bradley Walsh (Presenter)

| title = Bradley Walsh's Comedy Heroes

| medium = Television documentary

| publisher = Honey Bee Media Ltd (for Chan.5)

| location =

| date = 2023}}

{{reflist}}

https://natcen.ac.uk/news/40-years-british-social-attitudes-class-identity-and-awareness-still-matter

https://yougov.co.uk/ratings/entertainment/popularity/all-time-tv-shows/all 2025 YouGov PLC Retrieved 1 June 2025 The most popular all-time TV shows (Q1 2025) Only Fools and Horses came first. 9 of the first 20 are sitcoms headed by Only Fools and Horses in the first place, with Porridge (6), Blackadder (7), Fawlty Towers (9), The Vicar of Dibley (15), and One Foot in the Grave (19) in the top 20 with a total of 25 sitcoms featuring in the to 100.

https://www.ranker.com/crowdranked-list/the-best-british-sitcoms-of-all-time At Ranker's The Best British Sitcoms of All Time, Ranked 2025 Ranker. Fawlty Towers tops the list with Only Fools and Horse in second place followed by Blackadder (3), Mr Bean (4). Two thirds of the programmes in this ranking premiered in the 20th century.

In a 2016 Radio Times poll from a shortlist of 40 21st century sitcoms https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-37162569 'Mrs Brown's Boys named best British sitcom in audience poll ' 2016 BBC News 23 August 2016 best British sitcom of the 21st century

  1. Mrs Brown's Boys, BBC One (started 2011)
  2. The Office, BBC Two (2001)
  3. Peter Kay's Car Share, BBC One (2015)
  4. Count Arthur Strong, BBC Two (2013)
  5. The IT Crowd, C4 (2006)
  6. The Thick Of It, BBC Four (2005)
  7. Gavin & Stacey, BBC Three (2007)
  8. Miranda, BBC Two (2009)
  9. Raised By Wolves, C4 (2015)
  10. Outnumbered, BBC One (2007)
  11. Peep Show, C4 (2003)
  12. Black Books, C4 (2000)
  13. Green Wing, C4 (2003)
  14. The Inbetweeners, C4 (2008)
  15. Bad Education, BBC Three (2012)
  16. Peter Kay's Phoenix Nights, C4 (2001)
  17. Yonderland, Sky1 (2013)
  18. wenty Twelve/W1A, BBC Two (2011)
  19. Benidorm, ITV (2007)
  20. Detectorists, BBC Four (2014)===cite template syntax===

{{cite news

|last1 = Blogs

|first1 = Joe

|last2 =

|first2 =

|date = 2024

|title = My Title

|url = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kudpung/sandbox

|url-access = subscription

|trans-title =

|format =

|work = The Signpost

|language = French

|location = Berlin

|publisher = MediaWiki Ltd

|url-status =

|archive-url =

|archive-date =

|access-date = 6 July 2019

|via =

|quote =

}}

{{reflist}}

  • registration: a free registration with the provider is required to access the source, even if a limited preview, abstract or review may still be available without registration
  • limited: free access is subject to limited trial and a subscription is normally required
  • subscription: the source is only accessible via a paid subscription with the provider of the source ("paywall")

AV template:

{{cite AV media

| people = (Director)

| title =

| medium = Television production/Documentary, etc

| publisher =

| location =

| date = 2001}}

Notability and sourcing essays in WP space

Advanced source searching

All high schools can be notable

Alternative outlets Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

Articles with a single source

Avoid template creep

Bare notability

Big events make key participants notable

Businesses with a single location

But it's true!

Clones

Coatrack

Common sourcing mistakes

Discriminate vs indiscriminate information

Don't cite GNG

Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity

Every snowflake is unique

Existence ≠ Notability

Existence does not prove notability

Extracting the meaning of significant coverage

Google searches and numbers

High Schools

Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments

How the presumption of notability works

Inclusion is not an indicator of notability

Independent sources

Inherent notability

Insignificant

Make stubs

Masking the lack of notability

Minimum coverage

News coverage does not decrease notability

No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability

No big loss

No one cares about your garage band

No one really cares

Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article

Notability and tornadoes

Notability cannot be purchased

Notability comparison test

Notability is not a level playing field

Notability is not a matter of opinion

Notability is not relevance or reliability

Notability means impact

Notability points Notability sub-pages

Notabilitymandering

Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability

Offline sources

One hundred words

One sentence does not an article make

Other stuff exists

Overreliance upon Google

Perennial websites

Read the source

Reducing consensus to an algorithm

Run-of-the-mill

Solutions are mixtures and nothing else

Sources must be out-of-universe

Subjective importance

Third-party sources

Trivial mentions

Vanispamcruftisement

Video links

What BLP1E is not

What is and is not routine coverage

What notability is not

What to include

Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia?

Wikipedia article Two prongs of merit

Wikipedia is not Crunchbase

Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause

Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé

Your favourite thing does not need a

sourcing

drafts

March 10, 2025

curprev 15:10, March 10, 2025 Rarely I burden myself with thinking talk contribs 6 bytes −8,295 ←Replaced content with '{{db}}' rollback: 2 editsundothank Tags: Replaced Visual edit: Switched

curprev 15:10, March 10, 2025 Rarely I burden myself with thinking talk contribs m 8,301 bytes 0 Rarely I burden myself with thinking moved page Draft:Philip S. Hess to Draft:Rarely I burden myself with thinking... undothank

March 4, 2025

curprev 20:51, March 4, 2025 David Gerard talk contribs 8,301 bytes +5 No edit summary undothank

curprev 20:50, March 4, 2025 David Gerard talk contribs m 8,296 bytes 0 David Gerard moved page Philip S. Hess to Draft:Philip S. Hess without leaving a redirect: back to draft while we work out what's going on here undothank

curprev 19:54, March 4, 2025 David Gerard talk contribs 8,296 bytes −664 rm deprecated and primary undothank

curprev 17:42, March 4, 2025 Rarely I burden myself with thinking talk contribs 8,960 bytes +8,960 major edit thank Tags: use of deprecated (unreliable) source Visual edit