User:NoWikiNoLife/sandbox

! style="background:#8A496B" | {{font color|white|Date}}

! style="background:#8A496B" | {{font color|white|The PHAC stopped providing updates on…}}

! style="background:#8A496B" | {{font color|white|This is controversial because…}}

| Variants

| New Omicron variant cases were surging at the time.
Why choose to stop reporting on variants during a surge in one of the variants?
Possible reason: Omicron was officially touted (both by the WHO and the Canadian health authorities) as a 'less lethal' variant.
However, even though it was 'less lethal' and by this point, a large percentage of the population had received two vaccination doses, the number of deaths kept surging,
proving that the so-called COVID-19 vaccinations (as they were 'marketed' to the world) were not truly vaccinations that would provide long-term protection,
instead, they were more like seasonal flu shots which only protect the vaccinated against one or two strains and then further vaccinations are required for new strains.

| * Deaths correction

| The total count of previous deaths was reduced by 180 (the death count for that day was 58, bringing the total for the day to negative 122).
No official explanation regarding this reduction has ever been provided. How could as many as 180 people had been reported deceased and then, miraculously, 'resurrected'?
If nothing else, the health authorities should have explained how such a statistical anomaly had occurred and what measures would be taken to ensure such mistakes do not occur again.

| Infection waves and recoveries

| XXX

| Nunavut data
(complete discontinuation)

| All data collection for Nunavut (new cases and deaths) was discontinued. No official explanation as to why has been provided.
At the time of discontinuation, Nunavut was registering a sharp drop in new cases, however a complete discontinuation of data collection may have been premature.

| Northwestern Territories data
(complete discontinuation)

| All data collection for Northwestern Territories (new cases and deaths) was discontinued. No official explanation as to why has been provided.
At the time of discontinuation, Northwestern Territories were registering a sharp drop in new cases, however a complete discontinuation of data collection may have been premature.

| Active cases

| On June 30, July 7, July 14, and July 16, the daily increase of active cases was 0.29%, 0.33%, 0.36%, and 0.36, respectively - 5 to 10 times higher than the average daily increase from May to July.
Why choose to stop reporting on active cases at a time when there is a clear surge of new cases and this data is more relevant than ever?
Possible reason: The surge of new cases indicated that vaccinations likely had little to no impact on the spread of different variants, proving the official narrative wrong.

| XXX

| XXX

| Vaccinations (exact number of persons
vaccinated with one dose, two doses,
three doses, four doses, or more)

| Last official data showed that 17% of Canada's population had chosen not to get any of the vaccines,
while 83% had received the first dose, 82.65% received the second dose, 49.60% received the third dose, and 14.30% received the fourth dose.
Why choose to stop reporting on these details during the time when the fifth dose was being recommended to citizenry?
Possible reason: Dwindling vaccination numbers (2nd: 83%, 3rd: 50%, 4th:14%) indicated the populace had grown weary of the official narrative and had diminished trust
in government recommendations regarding further vaccination doses. By this point, even some government officials who had previously claimed that vaccinations would
minimize the spread of COVID-19 and protect any infected person from dying publicly admitted that these so-called vaccinations are both unable to minimize the spread or prevent deaths.
At that point, the myth that these vaccinations would provide a solution to the COVID-19 pandemic was dispelled and all claims formerly made by the authorities regarding the vaccines lost credence.
Later, the authorities modified the definition of 'vaccination coverage' and published new statistical data (this time for all Canadians aged 5 or older), stating that 84.6% of Canadians (excluding Alberta)
had received at least one dose.{{#invoke:cite web

| Yukon data
(complete discontinuation)

| All data collection for Yukon (new cases and deaths) was discontinued. No official explanation as to why has been provided.
At the time of discontinuation, Yukon was registering the same number of new cases (weekly) as in the previous six months (weekly - mid-May to mid-November),
so a complete discontinuation of data collection made absolutely no sense.

| Hospitalizations, patients who required ICU,
and age breakdown (cases, hospitalizations, ICUs)

| Because most old

| Manitoba data on deaths

| Data collection for Manitoba was partially discontinued (deaths only).
At the time of discontinuation, Manitoba was registering the highest number of deaths in 19 months (since May 2022) - 41 deaths in just the first nine days of December.
This discontinuation of data collection is one of the most controversial and inexplicable of them all.

| XXX

| XXX

| XXX

| XXX

| New cases (Health Canada's website{{#invoke:cite web

| In May 2024, almost 10,000 new cases were recorded across Canada - more than in March 2021, June 2023, July 2023, or April 2024.
Why choose to stop reporting new cases unless they had dropped to a record low (5,000 or less new cases per month)?
The surge in deaths since then (April 2024: 222, May: 237, June: 317, July: 292, August: 431) indicates there has most likely also been a surge of new cases.
Possible reason: XXX

fatality rate

98% of hospitalized double and triple vaccinated

| X

| Ironically, this decision about the final removal of COVID-19 data updates came during the same week when a severe uptick of new COVID-19 cases was announced across the country.