User:Owittnan/sandbox/DRN Template testing

{{DR case status|closed}}

{{drn filing editor|Rudyon|09:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)}}

{{WP:DRN/Template testing/DRN archive top|No discussion at linked talk page section. Seemplez 22:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)}}

Have you discussed this on a talk page?

Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.

Location of dispute

• {{pagelinks|Light-on-dark color scheme}}

Users involved

• {{User|Rudyon}}

Dispute overview

There has been an NPOV dispute on this page for a year.

How have you tried to resolve this dispute before coming here?

Talk:Light-on-dark_color_scheme#NPOV_Dispute

How do you think we can help resolve the dispute?

I asked on the talk page about this at the end of October. No one has responded. I failed to find information on what do in this sort of situation. I hope at least that you will guide me in some direction.

{{WP:DRN/Template testing/DRN archive bottom}}

{{DR case status|Closed}}

{{drn filing editor|Fureto|16:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)}}

{{WP:DRN/Template testing/DRN archive top|reason=There has been very limited discussion on the talk page. At this point- DRN is not appropriate. Either continue to try to engage, or request a WP:30. DRN is only appropriate when extended good faith efforts to compromise have been attempted and have failed. Nightenbelle (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)}}

Have you discussed this on a talk page?

Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.

Location of dispute

• {{pagelinks|Saint Peter}}

Users involved

• {{User|Fureto}}
• {{User|Rafaelosornio}}

Dispute overview

The top of the Infobox describes Peter as Pope, Saint, Bishop of Rome and Patriarch of Antioch without qualifying them appropriately as "according to Roman Catholicism/Church tradition", etc. I removed them, as they are described with appropriate context elsewhere in the article. Rafaelosornio reverted the change without explanation. I began a Talk section about the change and attempted to resolve by consensus, but Rafaelosornio has reverted again without further updating the Talk section, and it doesn't appear to me that further unsupervised discussion will be productive. The history of this edit now feels very close to an edit war.

How have you tried to resolve this dispute before coming here?

Talk:Saint_Peter#Edit_and_reversion_in_Infobox

How do you think we can help resolve the dispute?

I believe a third perspective will help advance the discussion towards agreement.

{{WP:DRN/Template testing/DRN archive bottom}}