Login
Login

User:Pro crast in a tor

{{Boxboxtop|My Userboxes}}

{{user en}}

{{user programming-4}}

{{user sql-4}}

{{user c-3}}

{{user perl-3}}

{{User anti-anon}}

{{User:UBX/9-ball}}

{{user Metal}}

{{User:Xaosflux/UBX/User religion flying spaghetti monster not really}}

cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background:#ffffff;"

| style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background:#c6c9ff; text-align: center; font-size: {{{5|{{{id-s|14}}}}}}pt; color: {{{id-fc|black}}};" | 45px

| style="font-size: {{{info-s|8}}}pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: {{{info-fc|black}}};" | This user thinks that meat is yummy, and can be consumed sustainably.

{{Boxboxbottom}}

Hi, I edit wikipedia when I should probably be doing other, more productive work.

Here are my contributions to Wikipedia thus far. Just think how much progress I might have made on personal projects had I not been here! But, alas, the time has already been spent, and in a semi-productive fashion.

I often don't cite sources correctly, but this link is helpful the times that I do.

I am annoyed at the deletionist tendencies of Wikipedian culture.[http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/07/10/unwanted-new-articles-in-wikipedia/] The criteria for deleting a page appears to be at odds with what I consider common sense: would a user searching for an article be better off with a quality article about the subject, or with a blank page? Someone can make headlines in dozens of newspapers including NY Times and Washington Post, and have 120,000 hits in Google, yet be deleted due to BLP1E. I think BLP1E and notability requirements are currently too strict, and that there should be room for exceptions.