User:Psb777#Article Assessments

Now, if we like, we can link [http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/usatoday.html here] but once we could not. Any such link was blocked. As, once, were links to [http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Main_Page]. Censorship is usually bad, and self-serving censorship nearly always so. Let's hope that

[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/04/wikipedia_secret_mailing/ these]

[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/ lessons]

[http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/04/0333252&tid=267 remain]

learnt.

{{User:Lawrence Cohen/Gianoboxnoflu}}

Paul Beardsell thinks people should have enough courage of their convictions so as not to hide behind a pseudonym. Of course, this may be impossible when who you are is considered more important than what you say. He can be e-mailed at @.com. There's also a [http://beardsell.com web site].

/wikisociety

{{User aviation}}

This section is deliberately left blank.

/assessments

/wikispeak

How to call someone a hypocrite on WP

"We say a sentence is factually significant to any given person if, and only if, he knows how to verify the proposition which it purports to express - that is, if he knows what observations would lead him, under certain conditions, to accept the proposition as being true, or reject it as being false." A.J.Ayer, Language, Truth and Logic

{{Citation needed (lead)}} = {{Citation needed (lead)}}

{{Failed verification}} = {{Failed verification}}

{{Syn}} = {{Syn}}

{{Verify credibility}} = {{Verify credibility}}