User:Seahawk01/Notes:Consent search

Please feel free to add or I will add later. See:

In State v. Ferrier - police need to inform of rights before searching homes. Does not apply to cars.

{{cite news |last=Sanderson |first=Shane |date=November 10, 2016 |title=Racial search disparities run deep, according to new analysis of Columbia police traffic stops |url=https://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/local/racial-search-disparities-run-deep-according-to-new-analysis-of/article_203b3560-9230-11e6-a837-7fd6d0777779.html |work=Columbia Missourian}}

{{cite news |last=Sanderson |first=Shane |date=September 21, 2016 |title=Columbia police to begin using 'consent to search' form |url=https://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/columbia-police-to-begin-using-consent-to-search-form/article_c60277c0-7f7e-11e6-9142-03b449272ecb.html |work=Columbia Missourian}}

{{cite news |last=Kendrick |first=Deborah |date=October 2, 2016 |title=Columbia Police officers are now using a 'consent to search' form |url=https://www.abc17news.com/news/columbia-police-officers-will-soon-use-a-consent-to-search-form/103152849 |work=ABC 17 KMIZ}}

{{cite news |last=Love |first=Don |date=March 5, 2018 |title=Columbia’s approach to bias-free policing |url=http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/20180305/columbias-approach-to-bias-free-policing |work=Columbia Daily Tribune}}

{{cite news |last=Burgess |first=Joel |date=May 22, 2018 |title=Police searches in Asheville to face new restrictions, including written consent |url=https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2018/05/22/police-searches-asheville-face-new-restrictions/635268002/ |work=Citizen Times}}

{{cite news |last=Burgess |first=Joel |date=May 24, 2018 |title=Asheville police search rules: The fight behind how the change in consent happened |url=https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2018/05/24/asheville-police-search-rules-change-written-consent-how-happened/636991002/ |work=Citizen Times}}

{{cite news |last=Burgess |first=Joel |date=June 8, 2018 |title=Asheville police search limits draw national attention; ex-Ferguson prosecutor weighs in |url=https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2018/06/08/ferguson-prosecutor-asheville-police-search-limits-starbucks-racial-sensitivity/670353002/ |work=Citizen Times}}

NOTE: need to check for more updates...are limits just for cars and homes or also for pedestrians

To add: section on controversial aspects. For instance:

https://stanfordpolitics.org/2015/09/23/consent-searches-need-expand-miranda-rights/

The New Jersey Supreme Court in 2002 banned consent searches{{Cn|date=November 2018}} based on Article I, paragraph 7 of the New Jersey constitution. The Minnesota Supreme Court also banned consent searches in 2003{{Cn|date=November 2018}} based on Article I, Section 10 of the Minnesota constitution.

Both articles are identical and read as follows: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue except upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the papers and things to be seized."

Rhode Island banned consent searches in 2004 when re-enacting it's data collection law.https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/asset_upload_file125_28283.doc

{{Reflist-talk}}

Thanks to {{u|Eliyohub}} at the reference desk:

According to the ACLU document you linked to, the New Jersey case was State v. Carty (in 2002, as you mention). Googling "state v carty new jersey" will bring up plenty of results, but an article analyzing the case can be found [https://www.lawpipe.com/New%20Jersey/State_v_Carty.html here]. Note that the court heard that police may still request to perform a consent search in a case of "reasonable and articulable suspicion" that a crime has been committed. There is no need to find probable cause. A 2016 New Jersey Supreme Court decision looking at New Jersey consent searches (including applying the aforementioned Carty test) would be [https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/assets/opinions/webcast/a_37_16.pdf State v. Hagans]. A somewhat dated, but still relevant analysis of consent searches in New Jersey can be found [http://lawrecord.com/files/36_Rutgers_L_Rec_1.pdf here]

I will add another good reference:

{{cite web |title=Consent Searches |url=http://le.alcoda.org/publications/files/CONSENTSEARCHES.pdf |publisher=Alameda District Attorney}}

• {{cite news |title=L.A. County deputies stopped thousands of innocent Latinos on the 5 Freeway in hopes of their next drug bust |url=http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-sheriff-latino-drug-stops-grapevine-20181004-htmlstory.html}}
• {{cite news |title=Claims of racial profiling on 5 Freeway echo findings against sheriff's deputies in Antelope Valley |url=http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-sheriff-racial-profiling-investigation-20181107-story.html}}