User:Zilch-nada
cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 30%; background-color: darkblue; border: 1px darkblue; vertical-align: top;" |
style="width: 68%; background-color :#FFFFFF; border: 1px darkblue; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="3"|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |align="center" width="100%" |=================================================ZilchNada================================================= |
::::::A book read by a thousand different people is a thousand different books. - Andrei Tarkovsky
About
- I focus on no areas in particular, and my edits come mostly from surfing the site.
{{Userboxtop}}
{{User:Lighthead/Account creation required 2}}
{{user NPOV}}
{{User deletionist}}
{{User Anti-IAR}}
{{User:Thebiguglyalien/Userboxes/No politics}}
{{User:Penubag/templates/Userboxes/infobox}}
{{User reader first}}
{{user bold}}
{{User:UBX/WikiMemberTime|year=2022|month=12|day=28}}
{{User en-N}}
{{User de-2}}
{{User ga-2}}
{{Userboxbottom}}
Beliefs
- Deletionism - focus on fewer articles and make them better; less-edited articles are likely more inaccurate: it's better to be uninformed than misinformed.
- Ambiguity, in the most general sense, is the last thing needed on Wikipedia. When presented with facts, there should be as few interpretations - "readings" - as possible for the reader.
- Opposition to political Wikiprojects, as I believe they incite canvassing of ideology; a hindrance on a free encyclopaedia.
- All statements labelled "citation needed" should be removed immediately.
- Encyclopaediae should act like almanacs; they should be factual, plain and dispassionate, but informative.
Self
{{User all WikiProjects}}
|}