User Talk:Ricardocolombia

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I was recently going through your article, Hydrography of Cúcuta and North Santander, to add citations as part of the project to add citations. However, as I was going through the article, I found [http://self.gutenberg.org/article/whebn0007272109/hydrography%20of%20c%C3%BAcuta%20and%20north%20santander this source] which is the exact same text as this article, and as such, without proper acknowledgement, this is WP:PLAGARISM. Here are some Wikipedia policies and guidelines that may help you: WP:VERIFY, WP:CITE, and WP:CQR.

Can you please fix this and any other instances of plagarism, by rewording information and citing sources? Thanks.

Ariadne (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

:{{re|Ariadne Lily}} Thank you for looking up and adding citations. However, [http://self.gutenberg.org/article/whebn0007272109/hydrography%20of%20c%C3%BAcuta%20and%20north%20santander the source] you linked is actually a non-compliant Wikipedia mirror. See "{{tq|Project Gutenberg Self-Publishing Press, also known as Project Gutenberg Consortia Center. Unlike the Gutenberg Project itself, Project Gutenberg Self-Publishing allows submission of texts never published before, including self-published ebooks. Also owns the "gutenberg.us" domain. Launched in 2012, by 2015 became notorious for close connection with one "World Public Library Association". This latter, allegedly an "aggregator of eBooks", among other, publishes a sham encyclopedia called "World Heritage Encyclopedia" made of mangled Wikipedia articles.}}" See also Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/All#Project_Gutenberg_Self-Publishing_Press. Essentially, they copy content from Wikipedia itself. As such, this is not a WP:COPYVIO case. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

::Ah, I see. Thank you, and I will review the sources I found again, and re-cite them. Apologies to you, Ricardocolombia, and thank you, Lemongirl. Ariadne (talk) 03:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historic_church&redirect=no Historic church] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 9#Historic church}} until a consensus is reached. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 17:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Flag of Cúcuta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable flag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atavoidirc (talk) 16:27, 19 March 2025 (UTC)