User talk:Δ/20100901

25px Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from :Ashcroft Incorporated. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashcroft_Incorporated&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --John Nagle (talk) 07:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

By the way, that article turned out to be a copyvio, along with the image. This is NOT a template message. :) --Hammersoft (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

The ISBNs weren't really invalid, someone was just guilty of overkill in giving both the original ISBN, and the ISBN-13. Simply removing sources is not a good idea - tag them for verification by all means, and if you do remvoe a source for some reason, good idea to put a fact tag in its place. David Underdown (talk) 13:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi,
if you get around to it, could you tell Δbot that when it fills Δ/Sandbox, it should compare the "Last clerk/checkuser to edit case" timestamp with the "Date filed" timestamp and write "Never" if it's older? Like in {{oldid2|382530856|this revision}} where it points out that MuZemike had edited the Breein1007 case page last year, which is a bit misleading.
Thanks, Amalthea 19:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

::{{Done}} ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 16:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

:Another sandbox note - I'm not sure where the bot pulls the names of clerks/CU's, but could you add Frank and I to the CU list? Thanks! TNXMan 16:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

::And {{done}} see User:Δbot/Clerks and User:Δbot/CheckUsers ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 16:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

If the licence condition on photos requires proper attribution in the manner specified by the author, then it is necessary to comply with it, or not use the photo.Rowland Goodman (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

:As you have been told on your talk page, the conditions that you state may be used provided copyright attribution is given and that is being done via the image description page. If you continue to be disruptive, further action may be taken against you. Credit is not required in image captions, but on the file description page. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 19:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for compiling the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:%CE%94/Sandbox_2 BLP] list - I have posted it to the unreferenced BLP project for their perusal. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 13:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Your cleanup removes image links for images that are not yet uploaded. If your cleanup is going to do that, perhaps it can use HTML command for commands instead , so it can be restored later. Otherwise I'm just going to revert whole sections to restore them, undoing all your cleanup. Tom Ruen (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

:What I do is remove deleted/non-existent images, Im trying to cleanup articles not drown them with HTML comments. When you upload the images just go back and place them in the proper location, blindly reverting is not acceptable. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 22:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

: I offered a suggestion. It's your choice what's acceptable. Tom Ruen (talk) 22:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

:*I concur with Δ. I routinely run across html comments left by bots sometimes years in the past. I always remove them. It's useless clutter. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

: Thanks for {{diff2|383277535|that}}! Amalthea 14:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

You have removed a number of links to a webpage on a webnode.com site because of the WP:EL guidelines. However, I can't find any indication which part of the guideline these links are supposed to violate. They are part of [http://comicsfestivalbelgium.webnode.com/ the official website] of the yearly comics festival responsible for the Prix Saint-Michel, a well-respected comics award. I will reinstate these links in the comics articles where you removed them. Fram (talk) 13:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

:I just did a quick google search and checked the first two pages and couldn't locate it. Is there some reliable third party site that could be used instead of a webnode site? ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 13:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

::If the webnode site is the official site, then why should we need to find another one? Fram (talk) 13:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

:::Let me re-phrase that, (what that says was not my meaning). What third party reliable sources are there to show that that is the official site for the festival? webnode is widely known not to be reliable and should be avoided. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 14:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

:::It should probably also be noted that WP:EL specifically does not cover citations (see 3rd para. of lead), which these were. –xeno^talk 14:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Betacommand, I have asked you long ago to stop changing things that don't need to be changed, when doing cleanup. You are still changing section headers without spaces to section headers with spaces, which is utterly unnecessary and only makes the diff harder to read. As for evidence that this is teh official website: [http://www.bruxelles-tourisme.be/informations/events_saint_gilles__comics_festival_belgium___comic_strips_festival_of_brussels/en/E/37285.html this] links to [http://comicsfestivalbelgium.webnode.com/ this], which is already at webnode.com. That page has a link to [http://comicsfestivalbelgium.webnode.com/prix-saint-michel-sint-michielsprijzen/ this], which links to [http://files.comicsfestivalbelgium.webnode.com/200000253-199c11a968/Saint-Michel%202010%20Nomin%C3%A9s%20FR.pdf the page in question]. All except for the first, external, link, are at the same main address. The main address is confirmed at [http://www.lalibre.be/culture/livres/article/605924/a-livre-ouvert.html la Libre Belgique] a newspaper, as well. Fram (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

:Thank you for providing information that I could not locate that verified that in this case, webnode as a reliable source. Since you cannot show me the basic respect to use the right username I think this conversation is over with. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 14:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

::I don't have a "triangle" on my keyboard. But if you think it is less respectful to use someone's well known old username instead of his or her untypable new one, than to remove references per (as xeno correctly pointed out) an utterly unapplicable guideline, be my guest. It's obviously easier to use such pretext than to asdmit that you were wrong and that you made me do a lot of unnecssary extra work to convince you of that simple fact. Fram (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

:::I should have used WP:RS instead of EL, I explained my reasons above about webnode not being reliable. Δ is not some random un-typeable character, nor is it "triangle". I use the Greek letter Delta. PS you might want to look into a spell checker.... ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 14:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

::::When you made the decision to start using a username that cannot be easily typed, you should have realized that folks would call you by whatever handle they find convenient (including the one you'd used for nearly five years). –xeno^talk 15:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AEMD_misc&action=historysubmit&diff=384577117&oldid=378953101] Rich Farmbrough, 06:16, 18 September 2010 (UTC).

Before you go trouting anyone, I know that the DYK ogg file was unprotected on the Main Page for 23 minutes. I've already made the necessary adjustments to the bot code. Shubinator (talk) 22:54, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

I love the image --Wolfnix • Talk • 02:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

{{clear}}