User talk:122.168.143.180#top

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

}}Slatersteven (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Not also you may be edit warring see wp:edit war.Slatersteven (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Do not delete information that has been added with citations, you are starting an edit war not me. Do not attempt to hide the full story.

:It is an unsubstantiated claim Pakistan has denied, no third party RS has said Indian shot down an f-16. Read WP:ONUS, if you are reverted you make a case at talk, you do not edit war.Slatersteven (talk) 15:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

It is not an "unsubstantiated" claim, the article clearly states that civilians on the ground saw 2 parachutes come out of the engagement, I have clearly noticed that you have some other edit wars going on related to India, it appears as if you have some form of bias against it. So do check your own actions first. I gave the citations needed to make the edit, do not revert my edits unless you have an actual source.

:Make a case at talk.Slatersteven (talk) 16:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I have said what I need to, unless you have a source that claims otherwise, you have no need to make any edits. If you still have a problem then contact a higher authority, they can do what is necessary.

:Any case must be made on the articles talk page, so others can join in. But fair enough, if you want to be reverted I shall, when you breach wp:3rr.Slatersteven (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

NOw for gods sake go to the article talk page and make a case.Slatersteven (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Unlike you, user FDW777 actually provided sources, hence, unlike you, I am not in an edit war with him.

Please attempt yo improve your behaviour, constantly repeating "go to talk page and make a case" while engaging in an edit war does not make you look good, and it appears that you do too much of it. If you have a problem then either provide your sources or stop making edits and further escalating the edit war.

:That is what you are supposed to do (read wp:brd). If you had done so I would have said just what FDW777 said, but an edit summary is not a place to make a case. I am trying to tell you how we do things. I was trying to tell you how we do things here.Slatersteven (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I also think you need to read wp:spa, as so far this has been your sole contribution to Wikipedia, to add a highly contentious claim the projct have been over (more than once) on multiple articles.Slatersteven (talk) 16:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

: If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.