User talk:213.23.111.86
{{Talk header}}
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie|Beobachter-Philosophie]] (November 11)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
| style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, 213.23.111.86!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie|Beobachter-Philosophie]] (November 13)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie|Beobachter-Philosophie]] (November 16)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie|Beobachter-Philosophie]] (November 16)
{{clear}}
KylieTastic (talk) 18:56, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Your thread has been archived
| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
| style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello 213.23.111.86! The thread you created at the Teahouse, {{tq|Hey, I need an editor to fix the problem in this draft.}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Hey, I need an editor to fix the problem in this draft.}}. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
Concern regarding [[Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie]]
File:Information.svg Hello, 213.23.111.86. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beobachter-Philosophie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)