User talk:49.198.7.235#top
Citobun is completely wrong
Citobun does not know what he's talking about as he is trying to glorify and protect someone who has been accused of traffic crimes for the sake of advancing his own political agendas: namely to bash China. Your edits and additional citations were actually helpful, and try not to listen to uneducated trolls like him.
suggestions
You can remove Citobun's smear campaigning from your talk page by editing the source of your talk page. I can help you protect the Gui Minhai page from his abusive reverts.
Your thread has been archived
style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
valign="top"
| Hi 49.198.7.235! You created a thread called {{tq|broke the page}} at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit§ion=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to broke the page}} create a new thread]. Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC) |
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Hervé Ghesquière|Hervé Ghesquière]] (August 13)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hervé Ghesquière and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hervé Ghesquière, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Herv%C3%A9_Ghesqui%C3%A8re Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Herv%C3%A9_Ghesqui%C3%A8re reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, 49.198.7.235!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
Your thread has been archived
style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
valign="top"
| Hi 49.198.7.235! You created a thread called {{tq|1987 Mecca incident#Demonstrations}} at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit§ion=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to 1987 Mecca incident#Demonstrations}} create a new thread]. Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC) |
[[Draft:Hervé Ghesquière]] concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hervé Ghesquière, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of [[:Automatic train protection]] for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic train protection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. YorkshireLad (talk) 21:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Hervé Ghesquière|Hervé Ghesquière]] (May 2)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Fails notability guidelines, see WP:BLP1E}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hervé Ghesquière and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hervé Ghesquière, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Herv%C3%A9_Ghesqui%C3%A8re Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Herv%C3%A9_Ghesqui%C3%A8re reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Hervé Ghesquière]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Herv%C3%A9_Ghesqui%C3%A8re help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!