User talk:50.221.225.231

: If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

:{{reply to|Drmies}} State which alleged "personal attack" you're referring to. Per WP:ADMINACCT, you're required to do so. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 01:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Weather_Underground_(weather_service)&diff=prev&oldid=1284507930 This], of course. Drmies (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::{{reply to|Drmies}} Where's the "personal attack"? 50.221.225.231 (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::{{reply to|Drmies}} So nothing, then? You've made a false block, i.e. WP:ADMINABUSE? 50.221.225.231 (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Sure. Take it to ANI when the block expires. Or try to argue your case in an unblock request. You know how it works. Drmies (talk) 01:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{reply to|Drmies}} WP:ADMINACCT obliges you to explain your action before I make an unblock request. The fact that you're unable to do so is very telling. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 01:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{reply to|Drmies}} Is it your contention that accurately describing a user as a Marxist is a "personal attack"? Did you feel personally attacked by that? 50.221.225.231 (talk) 02:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::So, you are overlooking the "asinine comments" remark? That's pretty insulting. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Thank you {{U|Liz}}. Then of course there's the trolling, and the fact that the user [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:50.221.225.231&diff=prev&oldid=1284456089 was warned for the same thing] by User:DanielRigal, and then restored the insult and removed the warning. I could also cite [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Denali&diff=prev&oldid=1284440051 this insult], a clear violation of WP:AGF, directed at User:HandThatFeeds, that you just removed (thank you). Drmies (talk) 13:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::: {{reply to|Drmies}} {{tqi|comes very close to apologia for Trump}} Do you consider that comment directed by User:HandThatFeeds toward another user to be an argument of any sort, or WP:AGF? 50.221.225.231 (talk) 20:13, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::: Is it time for a full block and removal of access to this page? The trolling needs to stop. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::: {{reply to|Valjean}} Not being a far-left ideologue isn't "trolling", which is the only real crime you seem to be charging me with. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::Is there any indication that there is more than one person using this IP? If there is then maybe we need to consider what we can do to limit impact on innocent parties but if this is just one person who has been repeatedly obnoxious, on and off, for more than a year then I say we should extend the block substantially and yank access to continue kvetching here too. DanielRigal (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::: Accusing me of "kvetching" is a direct personal attack and violation of good faith. But of course it doesn't matter, because your ideological clique of Wikipedia editors can do whatever it wants with impunity. Rules for thee, but not for me. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

{{reply to|Liz}} {{reply to|Valjean}} {{reply to|Drmies}} Using the word "asinine" is grounds for being banned from Wikipedia? Interesting standard you've concocted. Let's apply it fairly, shall we? Here's just a few instances of Drmies using the word "asinine":

• Link: {{tqi|And reverting Y's revert after two hours is asinine--which sounds a lot more like the word I had in mind.}}
• Link: {{tqi|That they would revert again, with a phony "result of discussion is clear", that's just asinine.}}
• Link: {{tqi|and their rather asinine and unexplained summary}}
• Link: {{tqi|All this starts with this unexplained and rather asinine revert}}
• Link: {{tqi|I find your response to Scottperry a bit asinine.}}
• Link: {{tqi|and the MEAT link is really quite asinine.}}
• Link: {{tqi|"Note_to_User:MYS77_who_doesn.27t_understand_grammar" is really asinine.}}
• Link: {{tqi|This by Singora is among the most asinine comments I've seen in a long time (from a "real" editor}}
• Link: {{tqi|that Iran remark was just totally asinine and you really should apologize for it.}}
• Link: {{tqi|Comments on Talk:Microsoft are from a few days ago, but they are asinine.}}
• Link: {{tqi|This comment, "perhaps send a donation to a hospital in Medina, Tel Aviv, Dhaka, Orlando or Istanbul", that is so asinine that I'm a bit speechless, for once.}}
• Link: {{tqi|Useddenim, it may not be your fight, but with that asinine comment you are certainly helping turn this area into a battleground.}}
• Link: {{tqi|If they dispute the content, they can say that, but this "not verified by any editor" stuff is asinine.}}
• Link: {{tqi|Now, editors may come up and try to tell us to not give a [f*ck], and I find that asinine}}
• Link: {{tqi|And that user page is just asinine, completely unbecoming of someone who wants to work in a collaborative effort.}}
• Link: {{tqi|In addition, KristyBarnes, your edit summary here is really asinine}}

Why hasn't Drmies been permanently banned from Wikipedia? 50.221.225.231 (talk) 20:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

• Wow, I have a fan. Oh, you're not banned--this IP is temporarily blocked. Drmies (talk) 20:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::{{reply to|Drmies}} Answer the question, Drmies. Scared to answer? 50.221.225.231 (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Drmies (talk) 21:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

: If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

• Any administrator is welcome to make this block longer.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:20, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:*Just a note to clarify the latest block sequence. I blocked the IP for one month without TPA. {{U|Doug Weller}} increased the block to 3 months and altered the block notice above.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:*:Thanks for clarifying this. Doug Weller talk 20:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)