User talk:89.226.117.72

File:Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glans_penis?diff=440687134 the edit] you made to :Glans penis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Calabe1992 (talk) 17:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at :User talk:89.226.117.72, you may be blocked from editing. NHRHS2010 the student pilot ✈ 17:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Calabe1992 (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

:If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at :Glans penis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NHRHS2010 the student pilot ✈ 17:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calabe1992 (talk) 17:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

:If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on :Glans penis. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please also note that per WP:BLANKING, deletion of a warning message is considered proof of having read that message. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

:If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

{{talkback|Talk:Circumcision|ts=10:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)}}

Zad68 10:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

:I agree with your suggestion that we get input from more editors, so I went ahead and opened an RFC regarding the image selection. It's on the article Talk page. Cheers... Zad68 16:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello 89.226.117.72, I wanted to inform you that I am returning the image selection at Circumcision to what it was before your proposed change while the image selection RFC is open. You and I both agree that an appropriate image could improve the article, but we do not agree on which is the best image to improve the article, and so we agreed to get input from a wider group of editors. That is why I have opened the RFC and we are already getting comments.

I am assuming good faith here that your intention is to improve the article in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, and that you will be working alongside your fellow editors like myself within the Wikipedia core policy of consensus. Right now at the article talk page, there are three editors who are not on board with the proposal that the image you are suggesting is an improvement to the article: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Circumcision&diff=502091894&oldid=502085960 Garycompugeek], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Circumcision&diff=502108071&oldid=502091894 Doc James] and myself. According to WP:CONSENSUS, which is policy, a lack of consensus to support a proposed change like this means that the proposed change should be undone. This is the reason for my revert. It may be that as a result of the RFC, there will be Wikipedia policy- and guideline-based support for the image, in which case I will abide by consensus. Let's let the RFC run its course before acting on any change.

I am writing this because I can see from your Talk page here that you have run into difficulty working with other editors within Wikipedia, and you have been blocked for it. Please use this as an opportunity to demonstrate that my assumption of good faith is not misplaced in you, and that you now understand how to work with your fellow editors within consensus--if not, there are administrators who can help ensure edit-warring policy is adhered to. Zad68 19:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)