User talk:Abebenjoe#Precious
Archive change
Hi Abebenjoe. I made a change to the archiving you just did. For whatever reason all of the formatting was gone. The reason I landed on the page was that when the formatting was removed, a {{tl|helpme}} template from long ago was showing as if placed now. I'm not sure why you would want the formatting removed, which makes it very difficult to read, and I'm not sure you did it on purpose, so I placed it back. Of course, if you really do want it the other way, feel free, but please make sure you null the helpme template which can be done in various ways, such as
:Thanks, I goofed. I accidentally wrote-over my clipboard's contents.--Abebenjoe (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC
Canadian federal election, 1957
Image:Nuvola apps important.svg Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. ΔT The only constant 22:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
:I have to concur in that, as the principal author of the article. Those articles are on commons or on WP, and it is natural you'd think they are usable. However, they all turn out to be copyright (I lost a major battle at Commons over one of them) and we can't use them in the article. Thanks for your help though, and if you have any questions, please come to my talk page or the article talk page. Best wishes,--Wehwalt (talk) 22:28, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
If you would like information a bout Peggy Nash, NDP Leadership candidate, please email me (Tom) at media@peggynash.ca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.186.29 (talk) 18:00, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
M.J. Coldwell picture on 1957 Canadian Election Page
Originally posted on User talk:Wehwalt
Hi Wehwalt:
There used to be a rights cleared image of Coldwell, taken prior to 1946. If not, I have one from my David Lewis article that is rights cleared. BTW which photo did you lose the Commons battle on? Was it the previous Coldwell image?--Abebenjoe (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
:No, it was the three Liberals at the Ottawa railroad station, and the lineup to vote, for that matter. The Duncan Cameron image battle (if you are interested, I'm sure you can easily find it at Commons) stemmed from peculiar language on the LAC site that suggested his images were now PD. After a pain in the butt battle, an admin there ruled against that position and I had to make hasty changes to the election article and to the Dief article, both of which I wrote, got to FA and TFA and maintain. I think I've seen that Coldwell image, he looks young! Canadian image policy is painful to deal with, though I will say nice things about the fact that almost all pre-1946 images are kosher. Busy right now trying to prove publication the image (I can't link it, it is at suite101 dot com, which is on our spamlist) which is supposedly Crown Copyright, possibly expired, but I'm suspicious of it.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
::Ah...I've had these kinds of fights about post-1948 images from LAC. All my Expo 67 photos have been removed over the past few years, even though it clearly states on LAC that there is "no prohibition" to use them, or something to that effect. It was only recently, when I met one of the Wikimedia admins in person, at a Wikipedia Meetup in Toronto, that the frustration of dealing with LAC became painfully clear. So, when I can't take a photo of a politician, or building that no longer exists, I try to write and ask to obtain permission to use it on Wikimedia, CC3 licence, and ask only to use a small image and word it that it is only that file, which seems to work. I've done that about five or six times in the past few years. BTW, it's my pathetic picture of former Prime Minister Turner that is his Wikimedia image. It's awful, but he was in my neighbourhood in September 2009, and I took the opportunity to snap it. Oh well, at least there is a visual record of him ;). Take care, --Abebenjoe (talk) 23:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Bill Temple
Do you know if Bill Temple was successful in his candidacy for Ontario CCF party president in 1952? Unfortunately, the free preview of my Google Books source ends just as the outcome of the convention is about to be revealed. I assume not, but can't be sure. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 01:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Ontario NDP
I've tried to add the Ginger Group info to the CCF portion of the Ontario NDP article (particularly in regards to the role of the OFL). Please review. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 17:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, Ontario Section
Hi Vale: I noticed you changed the name of the Ontario CCF to "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, Ontario Section." I reverted because in the literature that I have been reading, it does not come out that way. If you can point to a good source, with page reference, that clearly states that the name is indeed "Ontario Section", than I would gladly put it back in.--Abebenjoe (talk) 06:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
:See [http://www.google.ca/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Co-operative+Commonwealth+Federation.+Ontario+Section%22 this]. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 07:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
That seems to be a library designation, not what the party calls itself.Abebenjoe (talk) 07:11, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
:It's the formal name the provincial party used to publish its literature. If you examine an Ontario CCF booklet from the era you'll see that it's published by the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, Ontario Section. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 07:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
All those documents are without a preview, so I can't read them. It still seems like a library classification, rather than its official name. I'll take a look at some of my actual books, and see if it says anything, but from what I've read, that does not seem to be the name the party itself used.Abebenjoe (talk) 07:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
::Here's [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=qiY_AAAAIBAJ&sjid=XE8MAAAAIBAJ&pg=1647,2169220&dq=co-operative+commonwealth+federation+ontario+section&hl=en another example]. Formally, the provincial wings were known as the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, Saskatchewan Section; Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, Ontario Section; Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, Alberta Section, etc. Less formally they were Ontario CCF, Saskatchewan CCF etc. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 07:24, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
:::And [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=InctAAAAIBAJ&sjid=lZgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4248,1169397&dq=co-operative+commonwealth+federation+ontario+section&hl=en another] Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 07:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
::::See [http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5832&context=opendissertations&sei-redir=1#search=%22co-operative%20commonwealth%20federation%20jarvis%22 Appendix B] which is printed page 232 (or page 246 of the PDF) - the party letterhead uses the name "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation - Ontario Section - The Farmer-Labor Party of Ontario" Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 07:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Ok, if it comes from the pen and typewriter of Joseph Noseworthy or Morden Lazarus, than it must be correct. The funny thing about this, and I've checked about five different books now, the authors always say Province, then the abbreviated "CCF". I found one reference to Saskatchewan as the "CCF (Saskatchewan Section)', but not completely spelled out. It would also appear that the secondary name is Farmer-Labor party of Ontario. The lead sentence should now read "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (Ontario Section)–The Farmer-Labor Party of Ontario, or more informally known as The Ontario CCF. . ." Attribution should be included in the Origins section. Thank you for catching that. I'll have to look through the CCF Constitution again and see if it is there, that would be an even better source, but for now, this is great.Abebenjoe (talk) 08:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Bill Grummett
I only made one edit to the article and that was just adjusting a link. However, I think being an MPP makes one notable to have an article so it shouldn't be deleted, just sourced. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 01:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Mistakes
"So I wouldn't make so many … mistakes". But that is why you are on Wikipedia - there are others to correct your mistakes - generally, sympathetically. I have moved Abebenjoe/Sandbox8 to User:Abebenjoe/Sandbox8. — RHaworth {{toolbar|separator=dot|talk | contribs }} 16:10, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Apollo Hoax in Popular Culture
Image:Ambox warning pn.svgAn article that pertains to Wikiproject: Human Spaceflight; Apollo hoax in popular culture, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo hoax in popular culture (2nd nomination). Thank you. Senior Trend (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
John Scarlett (Toronto) and WP:NPOV
Hi Abebenjoe, I wrote the article on John Scarlett (Toronto) you recently rated. Could you please give a bit more feedback with respect to how you think more emphasis could be placed on a neutral point of view?HamiltonHarbour (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Dragon (Spacecraft)
Hi Abebenjoe,
I've reverted your gender-related change, as "automated" does not mean the same as "unmanned" and a spacecraft can be either, neither or both.
Also, a better course of action maybe to instigate a change name for the unmanned resupply spacecraft article to uncrewed resupply spacecraft unless unmanned resupply spacecraft is an official category used within the space industry. Hope that helps, Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Main page appearance: David Lewis (politician)
This is a note to let the main editors of David Lewis (politician) know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on December 17, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 17, 2011. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or his delegate {{user|Dabomb87}}, or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:
David Lewis (1909–1981) was a Russian-born Canadian Rhodes Scholar, labour lawyer and social democratic politician. He was national secretary of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation from 1936 to 1950. As theUnited Steelworkers of America’s legal counsel in Canada, he played a central role in the creation of the Canadian Labour Congress in 1956 and in the New Democratic Party (NDP)'s formation in 1961. In 1962, he was elected as a Member of Parliament. He was the NDP's leader from 1971 to 1975. After his defeat in the 1974 Canadian election, he retired from politics. He spent his last years as a university professor and a newspaper travel correspondent. In retirement, he was named to the highest level of the Order of Canada for his political service. After a lengthy battle with cancer, he died in 1981. (more...)
Socialist Party of Ontario
Done. I do need to warn you, though, that one of the IP numbers involved resolves to Thailand — so please alert me right away if any inappropriate behaviour occurs as a result. Bearcat (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
[[AEA Silver Dart]]
We need to discuss before getting any more back-and-forth edits. I do have some major concerns over the stylistic aspects of the editing, that can be further elaborated on the talk page of the article. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC).
. . . (deleted very long, multi-day interchange between Bill and I)
:FWiW, I enjoyed our interchange of ideas and if you do want to know more about Voldemort (Peter Z), shoot me an email. Bzuk (talk) 16:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC).
[[Sinking of the RMS Titanic]]
COTS 2 demo
I read about that, since May 10th might conflict with Soyuz TMA-04M some people are predicting May 18th as a possible launch date.--Craigboy (talk) 21:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Peggy Nash
Done. But also, since the leadership campaign is now over and the issue that led to the initial page protection no longer applies, I've also unprotected the page so that it can be edited normally again. (I will, of course, happily reprotect it if a new problem crops up.) Bearcat (talk) 16:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Alexa McDonough
Just returned from a trip and saw your note on my talk page. I quickly looked over the article just now, then checked the PR to see who had commented. Looks like User:Nikkimaria has covered everything I noticed and then some. How about if you work on her suggestions and then ping me for a followup so that I won't being making redundant suggestions? Finetooth (talk) 03:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Sydney, Nova Scotia
"(→History: Removing unsourced content that was clearly plagiarize from the CBRM's website!)"
What is your evidence for this having come from CBRM's website? I searched for a while and couldn't find it on CBRM's website. I'm not saying it isn't there, just that I couldn't find it. This is all pretty commonly understood basic history for Sydney. I can provide sources for it when I have a chance as this same information has been published numerous time over the years, especially since Sydney's Bi-Centennial in 1985. Ken Heaton (talk) 20:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
COTS 2 Edits
I noticed your updates to COTS Demo Flight 2 and its related articles this morning, and just wanted to say great job (on both accuracy and timing)! Thanks for all your work! *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 10:59, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
:Thanks, now off to my day job with about two-hours of sleep :)--Abebenjoe (talk) 11:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. When you recently edited Lunar orbit rendezvous, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Webb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Sydney, Nova Scotia climate numbers
Hi Abebenjoe, I'm sorry to bother you with this, but at some time when you get a chance, could you posibly take a look at the climate numbers for Sydney, Nova Scotia that you fixed a few months ago. Myself and another editor have done what we could to keep the numbers correct in the face of constant vandalism from an IP editor. However, another IP (probably same person since making same edits to same articles as prebious IP) has changed the numbers and screwed around with the references, only now a bot has come behind the IP and made some changes and I can't figure out how to handle this without also reverting the bots changes which I know will only get me banned. Any help or advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Cmr08 (talk) 22:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
:Thanks Abebenjoe, I just noticed that you fixed the article again. I don't know what the attraction is, but the vandals seem drawn to climate numbers for some reason. Cmr08 (talk) 22:31, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Parkdale (provinicial electoral district)
Hi, I've notice you've done some nice work with the maps for this article. What software did you use to create the maps? EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 18:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
: Thank you for the compliment. I used OpenOffice-based NeoOffice's draw program and based the images on boundary maps from various sources.--Abebenjoe (talk) 12:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Aerial view of whole Expo 67 site e000990829.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to :File:Aerial view of whole Expo 67 site e000990829.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:General Charles de Gaulle at Expo 67 e000996503.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to :File:General Charles de Gaulle at Expo 67 e000996503.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Template:Conservative Party of Ontario/meta/shortname]]
A tag has been placed on :Template:Conservative Party of Ontario/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 07:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
:I don't understand your reasoning for keeping this template. Zero articles are using it now, and there is no reason to substitute it because typing the name of the party would be faster than typing the name of the template. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 01:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
:: I kept it only because I didn't understand why it was being removed. I don't really recall why I created the template, other than I guess I ran into something strange in one of my Ontario political history or political biography articles. Delete it if you wish.--Abebenjoe (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Numbered list item
- Numbered list item
Season's tidings!
Much appreciated
Wikiwings are the official award of WikiProject Aircraft. Styled after military flight wings, they are awarded to anyone who makes extensive, high-quality, or generally valued contributions to the area of aviation on wikipedia. They can be awarded by anyone, to anyone, in a barnstar-like fashion.
The wikiwings award is modelled after Rlandmann's wikiwings award, and were officially adopted by WikiProject Aircraft on October 29, 2005.
Do you have one of these? You should, you know. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)