User talk:Abecedare#Precious

{{tmbox

|image = none

|type = content

|text =

Welcome to my talk page.
Please sign your messages by appending ~~~~ at the end.

[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit§ion=new}} Start a new talk topic.]''

}}

{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|maxarchivesize = 250K

|counter = 26

|algo = old(21d)

|archive = User talk:Abecedare/Archive %(counter)d

}}

Unfiltered

Hi Abecedare. I noticed you're an early user of my new script. It's been renamed to User:Daniel Quinlan/Scripts/Unfiltered.js and it's now documented too. Please update your common.js to use the new name. Thanks and let me know if you have any feedback! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{reply|Daniel Quinlan}} Updated. I installed the script on {{u|Asilvering}}'s recommendation and it certainly has made me more aware of users' filter logs, which I hardly ever remembered to check otherwise. Will let you know if I come across any issues or have any suggestions. Thanks for creating this tool. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite block request for user [[Jamali287]]

Good evening Abecedare. Sorry to bother you again.

Upon examination of this user Jamali287 it appears he has made disruptive edits disregarding the warning of discospinster, Referentis and violating WP:RS seemingly knowingly, as he had been specifically warned about this instance,he has also been blocked previously for 31 hours.

He has been making constant disruptive edits on S-400 page despite repeated reversions and warnings.

Please take requisite actions. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 13:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{reply|AbhijnanGhosh87}} I have blocked the editor but note that tit-for-tat retorts such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamali287&diff=prev&oldid=1295236144 the one here] are not helpful and can get one sanctioned for battleground conduct. Always better to focus on content and sources and use dispute resolution instead of getting into personalized debates. Hope you'll keep that in mind in the future. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

::I apologise for any misconduct from my part. Will keep that in mind.Thank you for guiding me. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Violation of 'Consensus Required' on the article on Rajput

Hello Abecedare.. I believe that the user {{noping|Pyaaz Kachori}} is violating the restriction you had imposed on Rajput. The user has earlier added the varna as Kshatriya obviously knowing that their varna status is disputed; I had reverted the edit; please see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajput&diff=1295520145&oldid=1295502470 this]! Now, the user is reverting LukeEmily edits without any explanation! Please look into the revision history of the article! Best Regards. Ekdalian (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{reply|Ekdalian}} Thanks for the report. I have p-blocked the editor from the page for 3-months and reverted their recent edits; note that the latter action is simply procedural and not a comment on the edits' merits, which can be discussed on the article talkpage. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 11:02, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you for your prompt action. Best Regards. Ekdalian (talk) 12:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Abecedare brother

Hi Abecedare,

Thank you for the message and the feedback. I’m new and still learning the right way to contribute. I didn’t mean to disrupt anything, and I’ll make sure to follow Wikipedia’s sourcing and formatting guidelines moving forward.

I’ll use the sandbox to practice and review the welcome links you mentioned. Please let me know if there’s anything specific I should improve.

Best regards, Cosmicom01 (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

:Replied on your talkpage. Let's keep the conversation in one place (and not use LLMs to compose message like the one above). Abecedare (talk) 20:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for the feedback, and I understand your point. I’ll be more careful with formatting and sourcing. I’ve revised the section using reliable references and kept the tone encyclopedic. Let me know if it looks better now or needs more work. Appreciate your time. Cosmicom01 (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Help mediating a content dispute / warning for misconduct.

Good morning Abecedare.

I reverted a statement on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Viktor_Axelsen&oldid=1289262794 Viktor Axelsen's page due to WP:SYNTH, the sources didn't mention Axelsen as one of the greatest of all time at all:]. Eventually another Wikipedian decided the source I hadn't deleted was in fact not supportive of the statement entirely [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Viktor_Axelsen&diff=prev&oldid=1291003468 and took liberty to remove it.]

I took your advice and made a topic on the talk-page in reference to the general content removal. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Viktor_Axelsen&diff=prev&oldid=1292861977 To which the edit was then reverted] by Tung X. Nguyen without referencing himself to the talk-page, and stating that the statement "didn't even need citing".

I brought this issue to Tung X. Nguyen's talkpage requesting that he bring the matter to the topic talk page where I had announced this particular sourcing issue. However, during both attempts he made an incredibly combative paragraph which was in-laden with ad hominem attacks, and complete disregard for the issue at hand. I had cited WP:RS and WP:SYNTH multiple times for this particular user. He repeats this paragraph yet again on the talk page.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Viktor_Axelsen&diff=prev&oldid=1297597853 He then reverts the edit again] indirectly calling me insane and more ad hominem attacks.

I did try to bring this issue to the talk page, but it appears he's arguing in complete bad faith. This user has been warned three times for not sourcing his content and appears to have not learned his lesson at all. I believe his behaviour warrants an indefinite block from editing the Viktor Axelsen page altogether.

Thank you very much for your time. DarkPhantom23 (talk) 08:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{reply| DarkPhantom23}} Left a note at the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Viktor_Axelsen&diff=prev&oldid=1298141215 article talkpage]. Fwiw, I don't believe that {{u|Tung X. Nguyen}} is necessarily acting in bad faith; they just seem to be unaware of some of the applicable content policies and guidelines. However, if they continue the slow edit war or needless aggression, they may be blocked from the article or even the talkpage. Hopefully though that won't be needed and the involved editors can collaborate to strengthen the article content and sourcing. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)