User talk:Afterthetruth

{{unblock reviewed|reason=I am not a sock puppet. The subject and I live in different states, clear by checking IPs. Furthermore, I have offered to give proofs. Afterthetruth (talk) 23:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)|decline=Based on behavioral evidence alone, this looks quite likely. I just checked and don't see anything to disprove socking. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)}}

Image:Stop x nuvola.svg You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are an obvious sockpuppet of previously blocked User:Blogging4truth, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Blogging4truth/Archive. You are blocked from editing. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 20:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

:Responding to your email - the shared content interest between you and Blogging4truth is obvious and unavoidable, and they have been a reasonably active sockpuppeteer beyond that. I'm sorry, but this is an extremely easy and obvious association. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I am not a sock puppet. The "shared interest" is a well-known Internet personality, hardly proof of such a harsh accusation. Afterthetruth (talk) 22:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC) | decline=It's pretty clear. Go away. Kuru (talk) 22:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)}}