User talk:AirshipJungleman29

{{od}} Okay. I did it. I hope I did it correctly! My stomach hurts. {{smiley}} Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

: You were right about the map, I should have listened. Nikkimaria is not accepting text as an "alternate method". So how does one go about creating that? Jenhawk777 (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

:: HELP!! I don't know how to correctly do any of what Nikkimaria says needs doing with the images. Could you answer her? Jenhawk777 (talk) 02:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

:: I attempted to strike some of my responses that are completed and ended with everything being struck, and I can't figure out why. I have gone back and looked for a loose s with no /s and can't find it - what did I do? Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

::: Nevermind! I figured it out!~ Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

:::: Two more editors have shown up with requests for additions. One wants bigger captions on the images - is that a good idea? Another wants more theology, and since Borsoka has also requested something on the Trinity, I will probably have to do that. One says I should stick to my guns about not including theology, but that I should add a "background" section up front to explain that. (???) Buidhe has opposed because, while she acknowledges that I have followed what the sources say, she wants me to interpret them differently, and I think that's OR - am I wrong? It's Easter weekend and I have company, so it will be next week before I can do much of this, but I am a bit overwhelmed. Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::Sadly, I'm on holiday too; will try to get on it if possible, but no promises. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::I understand. I'm doing the best I can. You do the best you can - and it will probably still be better than mine... {{Smiley}}. Have a good holiday, come back loaded for bear - please. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::How are you feeling {{u|Jenhawk777}}? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

{{od}} I have just written a long response with a request that the moderators intervene. That may sink it. We'll see. All your hard work. I'm sorry. Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

: UC said "there are also errors of formatting, MoS and prose" - do you know what he's talking about? Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:38, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there,

I have had a page rejected a couple of times and I have tried to get more clarity (on both their talk page and my own) however I've not recieved anything back for a few days. Hopefully you could give me a hand clearing things up?

Thanks :) --Dave83821 (talk) 22:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Dave83821}}, I have added numerous tags to the draft, pointing out issues needing resolution, such as the absence of citations and some promotional prose. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

How do I get Wikipedia under my name on Google telling about myself --Rock1n39 (talk) 05:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Rock1n39}}, that is very strongly discouraged per this page. If you are actually notable enough for Wikipedia, please wait until someone else writes an article about you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

::Theres loads of articles on google about me can you use one Rock1n39 (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Can you provide an example {{u|Rock1n39}}? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Please help.

I have just created my first edit. I would like to site the sources I have listed but I am having difficulty with the hyperlink. Would you kindly help?

Existential crises' are inner conflicts characterized by the impression that life lacks meaning and confusion about one's personal identity. They are accompanied by anxiety and stress, often to such a degree that they disturb one's normal functioning in everyday life and can lead to depression Existential Crisis is not listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) therefore it is not a psychiatric disorderhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/existential-crisis. You can not get medicine for an existential crisis. https://people.howstuffworks.com/what-does-it-really-mean-to-have-existential-crisis.htm Existential crisis is temporary and does not meet the six months of continuous anxiety symptoms for an anxiety diagnosis. Existential anxiety is different because it is comorbid with anxiety and medication can be prescribed to address the anxiety symptoms. Depression requires one year of symptoms for youth and two years of symptoms for adults. --CoachKellyej (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|CoachKellyej}}. For help with citations, please see Help:Cite; there are various ways to cite sources. However, this particular edit does not follow Wikipedia's style guideline for the lead section, as it goes into too much detail, especially for the first paragraph of an article. Your edits will thus have to be reverted. Please do not be discouraged; making bold edits is what Wikipedia is based on, and with experience you will go a long way. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

::Hello. How can I create a post? Or, are you able to create a post for me? I have created a theory and i would like to post it on Wikipedia --CoachKellyej (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Hi {{u|CoachKellyej}}, you might want to look at Help:Your first article. Please note that theories you have created are very likely to not be suitable for Wikipedia: any article subject must be notable enough for inclusion, which means it must have been described in multiple reliable sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I would like to add my Bio, please guide on how I go about doing that.

Thanks. --Dengayokkuel (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Dengayokkuel}}; creating autobiographies is heavily discouraged on Wikipedia, as this is not a site for self-promotion. For more information, please see the links I have placed on your talkpage. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

hey can you please let me know how to properly make edits --Jyotimakkar1310 (talk) 07:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Jyotimakkar1310}}, please see the links on your talkpage. If you have any further questions, feel free to drop me a line. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I hope to become more active, but I have been doing some editing for a few years. I've been using Citation Hunter and Wikipedia's internal suggestion engine to address maintenance templates. A common one I see is "This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information," often from around 2010-2015.

When I review these articles they have been heavily edited by many users and don't currently seem to use puffery or other language to watch (E.g., "Michela Wrong," "Nazia and Zoheb"), but as a newbie, I'm reluctant to remove these flags. Can you help me either identify what I'm missing or confirm that I am allowed to remove the tag?

Thank you! --ErrataNonGrata (talk) 09:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hello {{u|ErrataNonGrata}}, and please accept my compliments on your excellent username. Tags like that one you describe are useful to point out issues, but you are correct that sometimes they are or have become incorrect. Looking at Nazia and Zoheb as an example, you can see that the tag was added in April 2014, and much has changed since then. I would certainly delete the promotional tag. I hope that helps; remember to always be bold in your editing, and feel free to drop me a line if you need any advice or thoughts. Best, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you so much! I'm glad to know I'm on the right track and you concur. I'll be a little bolder and if I see a clear case that ticks all these boxes I'll move forward in the futurre.

::Thank you for your help (and the lovely comment on my username!) ErrataNonGrata (talk) 02:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. How I send a news link or YouTube link? --Silo34 (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

{{User QAIbox

| image = Meadow with dandelion near Lindenmühle, Lindenholzhausen.jpg

| image_upright = 1.3

| bold = story · music · places

}}

My story today is about an opera singer born OTD in 1870. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

What do you think about ALT4 for Nicole Gee? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Tout est lumière. - What do you think about hooks for Nicole Gee? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

today: a woman in red --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

On top of two entries for Roberto among the recent deaths, brainstorming for Easter music is going on in the nom, at the end - ALT0e/f/g/h - if you have little time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Next problem: WT:DYK#Good Friday. After I heard Bach's St John Passion yesterday (see music), it occurred to me that I missed the work by a great woman, that was inspired by it, in prep. - ALTs for the other run to m now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Nevermind. Check out my talk: for that Johannes-Passion (listen!), our music in detail, and three people who recently died and are on the main page (where the composer isn't). My call for collaboration has the first "no". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

What do you think of this Easter vs. 1 April discussion. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. - My story is about music that Bach and Picander gave the world 300 years (and 19 days) ago, - listen (on the conductor's birthday) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

I finally managed to upload the pics I meant for Easter, see places. - Also finally, I managed a FAC, Easter Oratorio, looking forward. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

The Core Contest has now begun! Evaluate your article's current state, gather sources, and have at it! You have until May 31 (23:59 UTC) to make eligible changes; although you are most welcome (and encouraged) to continue work on the article, changes after May 31 will not be considered for rankings and their prizes. Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Hi, I'd like to ask a clarification question regarding your close in Talk:Bangladesh genocide/Archive 7. The reason I'm asking now is because aside from one !voter who found the RfC through AN/I, every single other "Bengali Hindus" !voter—A.Musketeer, Nomian, Shubhrojeet, I.Bhardwaj, and LucrativeOffer—was recently blocked as a sockpuppet. This dispute arose solely due to these socks. Wikipedia:Dealing with sockpuppets#Closed discussions isn't that clear about how to deal with a closed RfC, which doesn't involve any admin action.

You left some wiggle room in your close ("as an example"). Would mentioning "Bengalis" in the first sentence and "Bengali Hindus" later in the lead (for example, in the following sentence or paragraph) respect consensus? Whether "Bengali Hindus" belongs in the first sentence or later in the lead is clearly debatable per MOS:FIRST, and I'm not sure if any active contributor to the article in good standing actually supports putting it in the first sentence. After the socks were blocked, it was reverted to "Bengalis", and no one has cared to add it back after almost a month.

As you pointed out, the RfC was technically malformed. If the RfC were discarded entirely, it seems obvious to me that the first sentence would be quite stable in stating "Bengalis". Malerisch (talk) 17:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|Malerisch}}, that is quite the pickle. Since it has been a year since that RfC, I'd say WP:IARing and retaining the stable status quo might be best. You might alternatively want to seek opinions at WP:VPM. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks, I'll go with WP:IAR then. Malerisch (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

sorry. thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

:No worries. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Rani of Jhansi/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Rani of Jhansi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

:The article Rani of Jhansi you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Rani of Jhansi for comments about the article, and Talk:Rani of Jhansi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

bro airship, why did u like so much moving a battle page of something that was literally legal to shared off? Like siege of balkh and battle of Beijing 1215?? Druzi1039 (talk) 14:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

:What? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

::bro you don't understand what im saying? I mean like i Saw you 2 Times redirect and moving a conflict page to something. Even though it was legally existed on other language article. Why? Druzi1039 (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

::anyways im just asking Druzi1039 (talk) 00:37, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:::No, I don't understand. You appear to be asking about redirects; see WP:REDIRECT for the relevant procedures. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

::::my point is, why do you redirect page of Siege of balkh (1370) and Battle of zhongdu during Mongol Invasion of China? Its better to have theyre own article Druzi1039 (talk) 01:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::See WP:GNG. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Wishing you peace, joy, and renewal this Easter season.

Thank you for all you do to keep Wikipedia growing and thriving.

Stay well, and happy editing! MSincccc (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:Best wishes to you too {{u|MSincccc}}! Looking forward to your next comments on the GA review! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I wanted to ask;

In case of a war b/w say X and Y;

•Majority reliable sources depict X as victor but 2 sources oppose it and declare Y as victor.

•Also, some of the sources which depict X as victor has specifically mentioned of why Y was not the victor but not vice versa.

•So, what should I display in the info box result parameter? I have checked almost all of the sources covering the event and barring those 2 sources I have not come across any other source which depict Y as victor.

•1 of the 2 sources which declare Y as victor may or may not be reliable (WP:RS). And the other one of the 2 states two different outcomes on different pages. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

:Why are you talking in the abstract {{u|Mohammad Umar Ali}}? Name the article and the sources, and I can look through it myself. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

::Hmm okay I will list them. I asked in case there is some policy regarding this issue.

::Here is the article; Maratha invasion of Deccan (1739). Besides looking into sources, please look into article's name too as most sources treat the event till 1740 not 1739.

::These are the sources which support Maratha Victory:

::1.) New History of the Marathas Vol.2 by Govind Sakharam Sardesai [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.32142/page/n195/mode/2up] Revised editions are available you could verify the same info there.

::2.) A Comprehensive History of India Vol. 9 [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.149767/page/n415/mode/2up] Specifically mentions that there lies no truth for defeat of Marathas, gives justification by highlighting Maratha success in the contemporary British and Marathi letters.

::3.) Baji Rao I The Great Peshwa [https://archive.org/details/BajiRaoITheGreatPeshwa/page/n137/mode/2up]

::4.) Peshwa Bajirao I and Maratha expansion [https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.4317/page/n219/mode/2up]

::5.) Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813 (Pg 125) [https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Advanced_Study_in_the_History_of_Modern/d1wUgKKzawoC?hl=en&gbpv=0]

::6.) History and Culture of the Indian People, Volume 08, The Maratha Supremacy [https://archive.org/details/marathasupremacy08bhar/page/96/mode/2up]

::7.) Baji Rao: The Warrior Peshwa (Chapter-Closing Years) [https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Baji_Rao_The_Warrior_Peshwa/5KohEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0]

::8.) Bajirao Peshwa The Insurmountable Warrior (Pg 93) [https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Prerna_Publication_Bajiraw_Peshwa/vdJwDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1]

::This is the source which depicts Nizam's victory:

::1.) The Forgotten Mughals: A History of the Later Emperors of the House of Babar (1707-1857) [https://archive.org/details/the-forgotten-mughals/page/175/mode/2up]

::This is the one which shows Maratha victory on one page and Nizam victory on other (questioning its reliability)

::2.) Advanced Study in the History of Modern India: 1707-1813

::• Pg (28) [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.460890/page/n35/mode/2up]

::• Pg (109) [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.460890/page/n115/mode/2up]

::Please provide your valuable input. I have listed all the sources which I could find covering the event barring the ones present in the article Maratha invasion of Deccan (1739) itself.

::Also wanted to point out this book, The New Cambridge History of India: The Marathas (1600-1818) [https://archive.org/details/marathas160018180000gord/mode/2up] If Bajirao died due to grief caused by defeat in battle why it is completely ignored in such a book? On the contrary it mentions that he died of separation from his second wife Mastani. You could perform a search for name Mastani to verify the info stated by me.

::Regards. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 18:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)