User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Abuse
{{User:AmiDaniel/VP/template/VPnavigation}}
__TOC__
Instructions
{{Warning|Before posting here make sure that you have contacted the vandalproof user.}}
To Report Abuse copy and paste the following onto a new line at the bottom of the page:
=={{vandal|username}}==
Infomation to include are the following:
- include a description of the incident
- add links to edits where you consider VP has been used abusively.
- sign your posts! (use
~~~~ .) - Try to be as polite as possible!
{{vandal|Purgatory Fubar}}
=Wrong venue, should be at [[WP:RFC|RFC]]=
In a discussion with mangojuice via my talk page, mango said that this should have been at RFC. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 17:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
This mess was[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive240#User:Purgatory_Fubar Archived] and no further comments have been made. So I guess it's up to you. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 22:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the update. As per vandalproof policy, if any user of this tool is legitimately blocked for any reason (especially for vandalism or violation of 3RR) and it is reported to a moderator, he/she will no longer be allowed to use VandalProof. User Purgatory Fubar was blocked here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Purgatory_Fubar] and a request to be unblocked was furthermore declined here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APurgatory_Fubar&diff=128978807&oldid=128971868]. User Purgatory Fubar is now being investigated for possible evasion of the block via sockpuppetry [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Purgatory_Fubar]. 86.27.59.243 23:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
:After discussion between Ale jrb and myself, we have decided to restore access to User:Purgatory Fubar. Some of the edits made with VP were in appropriate, but we have been assured that there will be no problems in the future.
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Questionable revert using VP by user with two recent blocks
{{vandal|wikimachine}}
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Dalhousie
External Links at bottom of page.
Dalhousie Peer Magazine's URL has been vandalized. When I attempt to correct it, I am warned that I am vandalizing.
The change was made Nov. 19, 2008 by 'Feldblo'
How can I get the Dalhousie Peer URL corrected and 'Feldblo' reported for abuse? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wainmanl (talk • contribs) 19:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
{{vandal|Storm Rider}}
Storm Rider inserted a "troll tag" to mock those he disagrees with on Talk:Joseph Smith, Jr.. It was removed for incivility, and he used VP to reinsert it. (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_Smith%2C_Jr.&diff=223693529&oldid=223693251] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Juden&diff=223693532&oldid=220885940]) This is clearly not a reversion of vandalism, but a use of VP to insert and defend incivility. - Juden (talk) 08:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
:It may be worth reading the Talk:Joseph Smith, Jr.article to understand the posting of the warning not to feed the trolls. The talk page needs several more warnings beside this one, a mediator might be helpful. --Storm Rider (talk) 08:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
::Using Vandal Patrol to settle a dispute in which you yourself are involved is pretty clearly an abuse of Vandal Patrol. - Juden (talk) 08:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
:::There was no settling of a dispute, but you clearly deleted information off of a discussion page, which I reverted justifiably. --Storm Rider (talk) 09:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
::::Clearly that's your contention. You maintain that your name-calling is "information". Others will judge. - Juden (talk) 10:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)