User talk:Amplitude101

25px Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{#if:|:{{{1}}}|Wikipedia}}. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the {{#if:|[{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=history}} page history]|page history}}. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Abce2|Howdy! 00:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

25px The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koirala?diff=288166058 recent edit] you made to :Koirala constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Banaticus (talk) 00:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|Rollbackgiven}}

I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAME}} granted] rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Why was the reference to the Drudge Report and the Political Simpleton removed? A request for the link to removed was fufilled. Please Advise Palmbeech (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC).

But I fail to see how providing a translation of an obscure Old Norse word isn't constructive, given that this is the English wikipedia. Please cease your unconstructive reversions and make your case on the article's discussion page. Cheers. -114.91.65.194 (talk) 14:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

how do you make a content box —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonman1 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

no not on your page on any article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonman1 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiLook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 18:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:WikiLook firefox addon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)