User talk:Andrew Base

{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1916516330}}

{{checkuserblock-account|sig=TonyBallioni (talk) 19:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1= I'm falsely accused. I only have one alternate account which I've disclosed. I've never used any other accounts. I only made constructive edits, Girth Summit and Barkeep49 knows better about me. Andrew Base (talk) 03:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC) | decline = After reviewing the contributions of this account, as well as the technical data, I fully agree with TonyBallioni's conclusions: this is a sock puppet of Knightrises10. CheckUsers: additional information about this block is available to you on the CU wiki [https://checkuser.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TonyBallioni/23_December_2019 here]. Mz7 (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2019 (UTC)}}

:{{ec}} I have reviewed the data for this block and endorse its validity. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 08:43, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

{{u|Mz7}}, {{u|TonyBallioni}} and {{u|L235}}, for how long did you suspect me to be a sock of {{u|Knightrises10}} ? Andrew Base (talk) 11:50, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

• I would like to make it clear I am not contradicting CU evidence or anything, but are y'all sure this evidence is 100% conclusive? I've seen Andrew Base's work around a couple times, looked at his CVUA course with Girth Summit, and while they have made mistakes, I certainly don't think that they are a sockpuppet, based on his work I've seen around. If this is 100% definite evidence, I would endorse this block, but if not, I kind of doubt it... Just my 2¢ though, this is my opinion only of course. Thanks, Puddleglum ^2.0 01:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

:: Yes, the evidence—both behavioral and technical—is 100% conclusive, in my view. Mz7 (talk) 02:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

::: {{u|Mz7}}, I'd still deny that I'm a sockpuppet of Knightrises10, I think this is some kind of misunderstanding going on, and about the behavioural evidence I'd say that there are thousands of vandal fighters but that dosent mean that they are a sockpuppet of one another. Yes, I did make mistakes like copying answers from another NPPSchool students assignment but I never did anything which was against Wikipedia guidelines. I'd say that the technical evidence is some kind of misunderstanding. Andrew Base (talk) 04:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

::::{{u|Andrew Base}}, hi - I'm catching up after a Christmas break, and got your notification above. I'm afraid that I can't offer you any assistance here - I am not permitted to see the CU evidence, so I can't comment on that in any way. While there was nothing in our previous interactions to make me suspect that you have used earlier accounts, there is similarly nothing that I could point at to show that you didn't. Three experienced admins and checkusers have reviewed the evidence and are convinced that the block is valid - I find it hard to believe that this is a simple misunderstanding. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)