User talk:Antony-22#Always precious

Hello Antony! Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Four_Mile_Run_Trail&diff=prev&oldid=970877022 this edit]: where does the trail go north-west past the 0.5mi marker? I've seen the obvious 0.5mi marker near the split, and I've been looking everywhere for the 0mi marker and don't seem to see it on the footpath down the creek, or anywhere on the W&OD. Is it gone or hiding? Thanks in advance! ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:20, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

:I suspect that the Four Mile Run Trail continues concurrently with the Washington and Old Dominion Trail southwestward to the middle of Benjamin Banneker Park. From there, the Four Mile Run Trail continues west and ends at Van Buren Street, while the Washington and Old Dominion Trail runs north over this bridge and eventually rejoins the old rail right-of-way. It's hard to find sources for this, but old maps might help, as the Four Mile Run Trail is older than the Washington and Old Dominion Trail. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 00:03, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Antony-22. Thank you for your work on 2025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reorganization. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=In the longer term, there's an argument for this page being merged to United States Department of Health and Human Services (kept as a history of the potential breakup of the department). For now, though, it seem reasonable to keep this article separate; it is appropriately referenced, and has a remarkably neutral tone.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Klbrain}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Antony-22. Thank you for your work on Administration for a Healthy America. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=There's a hint of WP:CRYSTALBALL about the early creation of this article, particularly in conjunction with the parallel 2025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reorganization, but given the importance of the topic is seems reasonable to carry it. In some places there is unclear tense (a 'planned agency' and 'the creation of the AHA was'), but this is likely to continue for a while as we move towards the creation of the 'administration'. Appropriately linked; well-written and structured; a hot topic.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Klbrain}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

== DYK: funding by lottery ==

Hi Antony-22,

It took a while, but I eventually noticed you left a review for my DYK nomination for Funding by lottery. Thank you for taking the time and for the useful feedback!

I edited the page to implement your suggestions.

Among other things, you suggested removing the hyphenation in funding-by-lottery. I agree this is a good idea, and while implementing the change I also moved the page from Funding-by-lottery to Funding by lottery.

The only suggestion I wasn't sure how to handle is the recommendation for a sharper / more precise hook. I've looked at the DYK guidelines and looked up examples, and while the hook I proposed still stands as my favorite, I'm very much open to changing it into something that works better.

Best wishes,

Pulcis (talk)

25px Hello! Your submission of 2025 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reorganization at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 09:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC)