User talk:Arbraxan

Welcome

width="100%" style="background:transparent"

|style="width: 50%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"

|

Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts or link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

width="100%" style="background-color:#F5FFFA"

|style="width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA;"

Getting started
style="color:#000"|
Finding your way around
style="color:#000"|
Editing articles
style="color:#000"|

|style="width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

width="100%" cellpadding="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"

!

Getting help
style="color:#000"|
How you can help
style="color:#000"|

|}

|}

[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Main product]]

Image:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

|width=20%|align=right}}

A tag has been placed on :Main product requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Final product]]

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Final product has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:Dictionary definition, one of the relatively few such which could not be expanded sensibly into an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 15:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

August 2013

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=568664955 your edit] to Law of one price may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:Law of one price|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

  • homogeneous good in all locations. In efficient markets the convergence on one price is instant. {{red|(}}''For further discussion, please refer to Rational pricing

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | The Original Barnstar

style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You have written a very good article about Tapered Integration! Cat 5120 (talk) 03:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martin Wood (artist)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Martin Wood (artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:No evidence provided or found that the subject meets the :WP:ARTIST notability criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

[[Claude Ménard]]

Hi Arbraxan. Just an FYI - when you move an article to create a disambiguation, it is preferable to fix the incoming links to the article you're moving first. That way, readers don't end up at the wrong page, which is precisely the whole point of creating a disambiguation page anyway! SFB 18:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

:Ok, thanks for the reminder. --Arbraxan (talk) 12:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

[[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]]

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

[[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]]

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

[[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Arbraxan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Proposed deletion of [[Nofar]]

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Nofar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:This is a non-notable name per WP:APONOTE as there aren't at least two notable people with the name or is otherwise notable per WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Arbraxan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Ways to improve Rema Hanna

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Arbraxan, thanks for creating Rema Hanna!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Independent references are needed to show notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

: Frankly, I don't really see how, considering the length of the article, you could add many more citations for verification. Of course, you could just cite the CV for each and every sentence of the biography, but that would be missing the purpose, no? --Arbraxan (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development]]

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

|width=20%|align=right}}

A tag has been placed on :Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Bureau+for+Research+and+Economic+Analysis+of+Development|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

File:Information.svg Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, :Assar Lindbeck, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

style="border: 6px solid #ABCDEF; background-color: #FFFFFF;"

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |

|rowspan="2" |

|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | File:Women in Red logo.svg Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by {{u|Bobo.03}} at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.49% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for March:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/70|Women's History Month (This event is a collaboration with two other wiki organizations: our article campaign supports Art+Feiminism, while our image campaign supports Whose Knowledge?)|color=white}}

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative|color=white}}

style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid black;" |

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or

Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Work 4.0]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Work 4.0 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Work 4.0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Arbraxan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Arbraxan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Precious

{{user precious|header=economists in the world|thanks=for quality articles about economists, such as Gabriel Zucman, Paul Glewwe, Eliana La Ferrara, Mark Rosenzweig (economist) and Aysit Tansel, for suggesting "Structure for improvement of the article", for your simple consistent userpage, for service from 2010 with a focus on content, -}}

You are recipient no. 2355 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Oded Stark]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Oded Stark, to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Oded_Stark significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oded Stark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Pauper labor fallacy]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Pauper labor fallacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pauper labor fallacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeŻet (talk) 10:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Arbraxan

Thank you for creating Oleg Itskhoki.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Nice work!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|North8000}}}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|~~~~}} .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)