User talk:Archimerged

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_energy_topics

does not seem to mention heat engines

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy_suppression

does not mention sense of "Free energy" as solar energy

which happens to be difficult to extract or as ambient

temperature differences

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_carrier

does not mention heat pipes (?), compressed air

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_energy_development

does not mention heat engines, ocean gradient

(which has an article... OTEC ocean thermal energy conversion)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energies_per_unit_mass

needs work

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_energy

does not mention heat engines...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_energy

needs work

{{Thermodynamic cycles}}

The Heat engine article has a "Thermodynamic cycles" template box, which has an item labeled "Stirling cycle" but it goes to the Stirling engine article. There is no T-S diagram shown for the Stirling cycle.

Cool. Just checked and saw your edit - thanks for contributing. It's not an area I know much about at all, but of course that's the point of sharing our knowledge...

There are also two separate appropriate technology wikis on other sites:

• http://wiki.villageearth.org
• http://www.appropedia.org

I'm working on an argument, at User:Singkong2005/Wikis, for merging the three wikis. Comments appreciated. Once I've clarified my thoughts, and the arguments, I'll post a link on those wikis and hopefully get some constructive discussion and decisions.

Cheers --Singkong2005 08:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi {{u|Archimerged}}, I love your plot of $\backslash varepsilon\text{'}$ and $\backslash varepsilon\text{'}\text{'}$ vs frequency ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permittivity#/media/File:Dielectric_responses.svg this one]) which is included in Permittivity#Complex permittivity.

In my opinion there is not enough in WP:Permittivity and WP:Relative permittivity articles about the high-frequency dielectric constant.....

Anyway, I was wondering if you know where $\backslash varepsilon\_\backslash infty$ goes in that plot..... Also, as I understand, $\backslash varepsilon\_\backslash infty$ is the same as $\backslash varepsilon\_\backslash text\{opt\}$? And I talked to my prof the other day and, it seems $\backslash varepsilon\_\backslash infty$ should actually be taken to be the one at the optical frequencies? But I'm not really sure? Do you know? And, if so it would be great to actually label $\backslash varepsilon\_\backslash infty$ on that nice plot of yours on the $\backslash varepsilon\; \text{'}$ curve.....

Cheers, Blue.painting (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)