User talk:Ariel.jacobs#top

File:Information orange.svg Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to :Travelling salesman problem. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

I just created my wiki account today, and was not aware of the no original research policy. my apologies. I removed the remaining addition. thank you. -Ariel

File:Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

I just created my wiki account today, and was not aware of the no original research policy. my apologies. All additions have been removed. thank you. -Ariel

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at :Riemann hypothesis, you may be blocked from editing. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:55, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

I just created my wiki account today, and was not aware of the no original research policy. My apologies. I will remove my additions. Thank you. -Ariel

File:Bratsche.jpgEng}}]]

Hi Ariel - I saw you were trying to write an article about yourself. There are a couple of things to watch out for. The first is that Wikipedia strongly discourages people from creating or editing articles about themselves. You can read more about this here WP:COI. The main reason for this is that people writing about themselves don't write in a neutral way, and include original, unsourced research. That seems to be the case with the sourcing you used for your draft - your two papers. My math and theoretical physics skills are not nearly what they would need to be to follow your logic, but even if I could, we require that the articles be sourced with reliable third party sources. See WP:RS. These independent sources should validate what your article says. Since the two problems are considered long unsolvable, if your papers are indeed the solutions, it shouldn't take long for a more knowledgeable journalist or scientist to write about your accomplishment in a scientific journal, and then viola - we'd have some proper sourcing to use. Until then, it's unlikely that your draft article will be approved. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 06:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

:WP:YOURSELF. EEng 19:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Ariel.jacobs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is and is not. Wikipedia is not just another news, forum, blog, or social networking site – it is a place for serious, collaborative, scholarly assembly of knowledge into a high-quality encyclopedia. Many come here with other expectations and have a difficult time as a result.
• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or {{input link |label=click here to ask for help here on your talk page |page=Special:Mytalk |preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload |preloadtitle=Help me! |type=newsection}} and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 11:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation