User talk:Bbb23#Assistance for Disruptive Edits

Probably want to revoke TPA. Refactoring your block notice. 🪷 nahida 21:30, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:I was about to post a warning for the refactoring, but before I could publish it, they did the same thing, so I revoked access. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey! I noticed you reverted my edit on the page for Howard Greenhalgh. Seeing as it was a revision on my part in the first place, its probably a mistake I made. Could you explain why you reverted it? I'm not understanding. Miraclefynx (talk) 21:35, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:I cited a guideline in the edit summary. Please read it.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you very much! I see that now. Miraclefynx (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm wondering what the point of this edit was too? I'm aware the article is still very flawed. I made a modular adjustment that I feel fixed some of its issues. Reverting the edit with no consideration to changes seems a bit heavy handed here.

Furthermore, are you crawling my userpage to revert my edits? Two is a coincidence I am aware, but it's strange to say the least. Miraclefynx (talk) 21:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think you're sufficiently experienced or knowledgeable about editing Wikipedia to make many of the edits you're making. Many of your edits are too ambitious, meaning you make too many changes in one edit, some of which are constructive but some of which are not, forcing a more experienced editor (like me) to decide whether to go through it with a surgical knife or an axe. In this last instance, there were more problems with your edit than improvements, so I used the axe.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:46, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

::Okay, I can understand that. If you could outline some of the problems my edit introduced, I would be grateful. Miraclefynx (talk) 21:49, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Why you draft my article? Teletoonek (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:Because it's not ready for article space. Use WP:AFC.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::Why? Teletoonek (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:::It has only one source, and that one is not reliable. It's also written poorly becauser of your poor English skills. It'll need a lot of work before it's ready to be published.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::::yeah Teletoonek (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::the actual version Draft:Aleja Bielany Teletoonek (talk) 16:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Wow, that was faster blocking than I could report it. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. I'm just curious about your revert on this SPI. It seemed to me like a reasonable place to post that. What in particular did you object to? RoySmith (talk) 15:36, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:As I understand it, the filer is not reporting any new socks but instead requesting that two SPIs be merged. If that's correct, the "normal" place to request that is at WT:SPI. If you disagree, revert me.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::I believe you are correct that this was a request to merge two cases. Maybe the talk page would have been a better place to post that, but if so, at least an edit comment like "Thank you for the report, but please post requests like that at WT:SPI" would have been more collegial. RoySmith (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:::You're probably right, but I figured they'd just ask. {{U|DemonDays64}}, here's the information you need for your merge request.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::::In any case, I've re-reverted it. RoySmith (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2025 (UTC)