User talk:Beeblebrox#Time to end it

{{Archive basics

|archive = User talk:Beeblebrox/Archive %(counter)d

|counter = 53

|headerlevel = 2

|maxarchivesize = 120K

|archiveheader = {{Aan}}

}}

{{archives

| collapsible = yes

| collapsed = yes

|search=yes

|image = 110px

|title = tracks of previous discussions

}}

{{clear}}

{{User:TParis/RfX_Report}}

image:Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement.svg

{{clear}}

{{Admin tasks}}

{{ArbComOpenTasks}}

{{clear}}

{{skip to top and bottom}}

[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samugam Media]]

:The article was deleted after an Articles for Deletion discussion. However, I believe that the decision should be reconsidered because I can provide additional reliable sources that establish the company’s notability. If possible, I would like the article restored as a user draft so I can improve it and resubmit it through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process. Thank you. Sukikowsik (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

::{{yo| Sukikowsik}} You may find you get better results when starting a new conversation if you use the "new section" button instead of replying to an existing post that is not relevant to what you are trying to discuss, and maybe provide some context and a header, as I have now done.

::I don't think there is any grounds to reconsider the result of the deletion discussion as consensus was clear, with three comments in favor of deletion and none in favor of keeping, However, as you state you believe you cvan rectify the issues identified I have restored it as a regular draft at Draft:Samugam Media. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Do me a favor would you?

And take a look at WP:LASTWORD. Logoshimpo (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

:I'm not really active right now and frankly don't recall whatever it is you are vaguely complaining about, but I'm guessing that if I did recall I probably don't care anyway.

:So how about you do me a favor and either make coherent comments with an actual purpose or go away? Thanks. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

I’m in need of editing advice

Hello, I was wondering if you could give me some advice and tips on how to become a better editor? I feel as if I’m not good enough, and you’re the most talented/professional editor I could find. Please reach back when you can :).

Sincerely and with Admiration,

TJ Kreen TJ Kreen (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2025

editor interaction review

Would you mind reviewing this discussion, as well as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Press_Your_Luck_scandal&action=history the corresponding edits in that article history]? I'm having trouble explaining policies & guidelines with another editor, as clearly and thoroughly as I can, and my interactions are being characterized by the other party as "dismissive", "hostile", "rude", and 'trying to "win{{double+single}}.

My apologies for showing up here, uninvited, but I think you're the only remaining administrator who's had hands-on experience with this editor (your involvement was here). I'm not trying to involve you in the article dispute, itself, but I think ChrisP2K5 has intentionally stalled or empassed the discussion, and I'm not sure what the way forward looks like. Thanks for your time, — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

:I'm not really active right now, this looks rather involved, and I can't say I recall the one interaction we had nearly fifteen years ago. However there is still one other admin who commented there, who probably also doesn't remember it but is currently active, perhaps {{ping|JBW}} would like to take a look? Beeblebrox Beebletalks 21:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

:: 10-4, I'll drop them the same line. Thanks! — Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Something sus?

Hi. I see you are the admin that blocked {{noping|Matthewjaredgarza2010}} so you might have some insight into [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWbm4567&diff=1287688940&oldid=1287686338 this conversation]. It might be sockpuppetry. Appreciate it if you could assist. Cheers. -- Whpq (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Whpq}} I haven't really been active so I just saw this. They openly admitted to attempting to proxy for a blocked user, so at the very least it is WP:MEAT. The user they proxying for was blocked for, among other things, incompetence. At a glance I would say a case could be made that this is a sock of that user and not just proxying for them. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 19:13, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Rusalkii

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Master Jay

|Orderinchaos

|Roger Davies

|Tinucherian

}}

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Galobtter

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
  • An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{t|sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
  • An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

}}}}{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)}}

Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:Remain calm]]

File:Ambox warning blue.svg:Template:Remain calm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:25, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Please see new section on [[Talk:Alaska Boundary Dispute]]

I've linked it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Alaska#call_for_help_on_the_Alaska_Boundary_Dispute_talkpage here] and posted also on WP:CANTALK in the search for someone to "help the guy" with his demands for line-cites and neutrality-challenge about what in BC and most of Canada is well-known information. Advice on fixing the deadlinks and links to existing articles that need integrating etc but unless he's genuinely interested in the subject matter and not just obsessing over line-cites and only wanting someone else to do them (same as me, bt I'm not an active Wikipedian anymore and am approaching 70 years of age and confined co an extended-care home and a wheelchair, so what writing i am trying to get done doesn't need constraint by a chorus of baboons and axe-wielding ego-trippers nor trying to educate those who will not listen - I sympathize with your userpage's observations (see the Maxims and Memes section on my userpage) and remember you as being sane and not an insulting prick (like too many Wikilanders) so thought to bring this matter to you; my closing comments on the wikiproject alaska talkpage get into the reason boundary-related articles are high priority for us (Canadians) so I hope y'all are understanding of the sentiments voiced in that post, so I won't go on at risk of further ranting. Sorry for the IP post, I don't have another account set up and am pretty sure I don't want one; you get too old to put up with endless bullshit, but you also too old to stand with lies and half-truths....m care aide's here with dinner so GTG. 'Ta.2604:3D08:5776:7900:0:0:0:E596 (talk) 00:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

  • An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)}}